Open source software for semi-automated histomorphometry of bone resorption and formation parameters.

Micro-CT analysis has become the standard method for assessing bone volume and architecture in small animals. However, micro-CT does not allow the assessment of bone turnover parameters such as bone formation rate and osteoclast (OC) number and surface. For these crucial variables histomorphometric analysis is still an essential technique. Histomorphometry however, is time consuming and, especially in mouse bones, OCs can be difficult to detect. The main purpose of this study was to develop and validate a relatively easy and rapid method to measure static and dynamic bone histomorphometry parameters. Here we present the adaptation of established staining protocols and three novel open source image analysis packages: TrapHisto, OsteoidHisto and CalceinHisto that allow rapid, semi-automated analysis of histomorphometric bone resorption, osteoid, and calcein double labelling parameters respectively. These three programs are based on ImageJ, but use a relatively simple user interface that hides the underlying complexity of the image analysis.

[1]  D. Chappard,et al.  Histochemical identification of osteoclasts. Review of current methods and reappraisal of a simple procedure for routine diagnosis on undecalcified human iliac bone biopsies. , 1983, Basic and applied histochemistry.

[2]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Development of new criteria for cortical bone histomorphometry in femoral neck: intra- and inter-observer reproducibility , 2014, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[3]  Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia,et al.  3D reconstruction of histological sections: Application to mammary gland tissue , 2010, Microscopy research and technique.

[4]  J. Kanis,et al.  Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: A 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[6]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  Y. Usson,et al.  An automatic method for bone histomorphometry: Assessment with reference to usual static and dynamic parameters , 1990, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  S. Ahmed,et al.  An Unbalanced Rearrangement of Chromosomes 4:20 is Associated with Childhood Osteoporosis and Reduced Caspase-3 Levels , 2016, Journal of Pediatric Genetics.

[9]  N Loveridge,et al.  Cortical and cancellous bone in the human femoral neck: evaluation of an interactive image analysis system. , 1996, Bone.

[10]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[11]  R. Erben Bone-Labeling Techniques , 2003 .

[12]  Stephan Saalfeld,et al.  Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions , 2009, Bioinform..

[13]  Yuehuei H. An,et al.  Handbook of Histology Methods for Bone and Cartilage , 2003, Humana Press.