Predominant period and equivalent viscous damping ratio identification for a full‐scale building shake table test

Summary The predominant period and corresponding equivalent viscous damping ratio, also known in various loading codes as effective period and effective damping coefficient, are two important parameters employed in the seismic design of base-isolated and conventional building structures. Accurate determination of these two parameters can reduce the uncertainty in the computation of lateral displacement demands and interstory drifts for a given seismic design spectrum. This paper estimates these two parameters from data sets recorded from a full-scale five-story reinforced concrete building subjected to seismic base excitations of various intensities in base-isolated and fixed-base configurations on the outdoor shake table at the University of California, San Diego. The scope of this paper includes all test motions in which the yielding of the reinforcement has not occurred and the response can still be considered ‘elastic’. The data sets are used with three system identification methods to determine the predominant period of response for each of the test configurations. One of the methods also determines the equivalent viscous damping ratio corresponding to the predominant period. It was found that the predominant period of the fixed-base building lengthened from 0.52 to 1.30 s. This corresponded to a significant reduction in effective system stiffness to about 16% of the original stiffness. The paper then establishes a correlation between predominant period and peak ground velocity. Finally, the predominant periods and equivalent viscous damping ratios recommended by the ASCE 7-10 loading standard are compared with those determined from the test building. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  THE PREDICTION AND USE OF PEAK GROUND VELOCITY , 2006 .

[2]  Jianghui Geng,et al.  Recovering coseismic point ground tilts from collocated high‐rate GPS and accelerometers , 2013 .

[3]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[4]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Influence of the construction process and nonstructural components on the modal properties of a five‐story building , 2016 .

[5]  Andrea Belleri,et al.  Damage assessment through structural identification of a three‐story large‐scale precast concrete structure , 2014 .

[6]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Seismic Performance of Vertical Nonstructural Components in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake , 2014 .

[7]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  System identification of a full‐scale five‐story reinforced concrete building tested on the NEES‐UCSD shake table , 2016 .

[8]  Gilberto Mosqueda,et al.  Performance of Nonstructural Components during the 27 February 2010 Chile Earthquake , 2012 .

[9]  José I. Restrepo,et al.  Shaking Table Tests of a Four-Story Miniature Steel Building— Model Validation , 2006 .

[10]  G. W. Housner,et al.  A dynamic test of a four-story reinforced concrete building , 1953 .

[11]  JoséI. Restrepo,et al.  Study of Loading Protocols in Light-Gauge Stud Partition Walls , 2011 .

[12]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Seismic Damage Detection of a Full-Scale Shaking Table Test Structure , 2011 .

[13]  Mehmet Çelebi,et al.  Response of Olive View Hospital to Northridge and Whittier Earthquakes , 1997 .

[14]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Seismic Performance of Reinforced-Concrete Stairways during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake , 2013 .

[15]  James L. Beck,et al.  Structural identification using linear models and earthquake records , 1980 .

[16]  John A. Blume,et al.  A machine for setting structures and ground into forced vibration , 1935 .

[17]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Empirical Correlations between Peak Ground Velocity and Spectrum-Based Intensity Measures , 2012 .

[18]  Nai-Chi Hsiao,et al.  Relationships between Strong Ground Motion Peak Values and Seismic Loss during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake , 2004 .

[19]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Full-Scale Structural and Nonstructural Building System Performance during Earthquakes: Part I – Specimen Description, Test Protocol, and Structural Response , 2016 .

[20]  José I. Restrepo,et al.  Performance characteristics of light gage steel stud partition walls , 2011 .

[21]  Emilio Rosenblueth,et al.  Response spectral ratios , 1992 .

[22]  Frieder Seible,et al.  Seismic Testing of Bridge Columns Incorporating High-Performance Materials , 2006 .

[23]  S. S. Ivanović,et al.  Apparent Periods of a Building. I: Fourier Analysis , 2001 .

[24]  L. Jacobsen Damping in Composite Structures , 1960 .

[25]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Response of Base-Isolated USC Hospital Building in Northridge Earthquake , 2000 .

[26]  Long T. Phan,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of five tall buildings during strong and low‐amplitude motions , 1993 .

[27]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Real-Time Strong-Motion Broadband Displacements from Collocated GPS and Accelerometers , 2011 .

[28]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  System Identification Study of a 7-Story Full-Scale Building Slice Tested on the UCSD-NEES Shake Table , 2011 .

[29]  Mahdi Ebrahimian,et al.  Wave Method for Structural Health Monitoring: Testing Using Full-Scale Shake Table Experiment Data , 2016 .