A spatial approach to bioeconomy: Quantifying the residual biomass potential in the EU-27

Abstract Bioeconomy is seen as a key strategic innovation pillar in the European Union, and this involves, among other things, mobilizing biomass resources. This study presents a geo-localized methodology in order to quantify the overall (theoretical) residual biomass potential for each NUTS-3 region of the EU-27 + Switzerland (NUTS-3 is the smallest regional division in Eurostat's Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics). Estimates were made for biomass residues stemming from 4 main activities: i) agriculture (straw, manure, residues from pruning permanent plantations); ii) forestry (forestry residues); iii) urban greenery management (residues from managing urban green areas and roadside vegetation); and iv) food waste (agri-industrial food process waste and municipal biodegradable waste). A review of earlier assessments using a variety of spatial coverages is also presented. Our results reveal the importance of residual biomass as a key feedstock for the European bioeconomy: we found that 8500 PJ y−1 are available for these streams (theoretical potential), which corresponds to the whole annual (2015) primary energy consumption of Italy and Belgium combined. Straw (3800 PJ y−1) and forestry residues (3200 PJ y−1) were shown as the top-two contributors. Our geo-localized approach uncovered outliers in terms of regional trends, revealing very specific opportunities for these regions. This includes the NUTS-3 region of Paris (France) where the highest biomass density was found with ca. 25 TJ km−2 (essentially food waste), and the NUTS-3 of Jaen (Spain), the main region of olive oil in the world, with great opportunities stemming from the olive oil industry.

[1]  W. Wagner,et al.  European Rice Cropland Mapping with Sentinel-1 Data: The Mediterranean Region Case Study , 2017 .

[2]  C. Felby,et al.  Biomass for energy in the European Union - a review of bioenergy resource assessments , 2012, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[3]  N. Scarlat,et al.  Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use. , 2010, Waste management.

[4]  G. Montanaro,et al.  Carbon budget in a Mediterranean peach orchard under different management practices , 2017 .

[5]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[6]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas , 2014 .

[7]  D. Voivontas,et al.  Aessessment of biomass potential for power production: a GIS based method , 2001 .

[8]  David Morin,et al.  Operational High Resolution Land Cover Map Production at the Country Scale Using Satellite Image Time Series , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Calliope Panoutsou,et al.  Biomass supply in EU27 from 2010 to 2030 , 2009 .

[10]  A. Faaij,et al.  Sustainability constraints in determining European bioenergy potential: A review of existing studies and steps forward , 2017 .

[11]  Christian Thiel,et al.  Mapping CORINE Land Cover from Sentinel-1A SAR and SRTM Digital Elevation Model Data using Random Forests , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Global bioenergy potentials through 2050 , 2001 .

[13]  André Faaij,et al.  Harmonising bioenergy resource potentials—Methodological lessons from review of state of the art bioenergy potential assessments , 2012 .

[14]  E. Lugato,et al.  Climate change impacts of power generation from residual biomass , 2016 .

[15]  L. S. Esteban,et al.  Biomass resources and costs: Assessment in different EU countries , 2011 .

[16]  C. Di Blasi,et al.  A study on the production of agricultural residues in Italy. , 1997 .

[17]  K. Klumpp,et al.  Identifying cost-competitive greenhouse gas mitigation potential of French agriculture , 2017 .

[18]  D. Tonini,et al.  Environmental implications of the use of agro‐industrial residues for biorefineries: application of a deterministic model for indirect land‐use changes , 2016 .

[19]  Christina Eisfelder,et al.  Quantifying the carbon uptake by vegetation for Europe on a 1 km 2 resolution using a remote sensing driven vegetation model , 2013 .

[20]  C. Rösch,et al.  GIS-based assessment of sustainable crop residue potentials in European regions , 2016 .

[21]  J. Olesen,et al.  Agricultural Waste Biomass , 2016 .

[22]  Myrto-Panagiota Zacharof,et al.  Grape Winery Waste as Feedstock for Bioconversions: Applying the Biorefinery Concept , 2017 .

[23]  Markus Tum,et al.  Validating modelled NPP using statistical yield data , 2011 .

[24]  Bernd Mahro,et al.  Potential of Biowaste from the Food Industry as a Biomass Resource , 2007 .

[25]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach , 2004 .

[26]  S. Piotrowski,et al.  Are Primary Agricultural Residues Promising Feedstock for the European Bioeconomy , 2017 .

[27]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental consequences of future biogas technologies based on separated slurry. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Birka Wicke,et al.  Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry , 2016 .

[29]  Katalin Bódis,et al.  The possible contribution of agricultural crop residues to renewable energy targets in Europe: A spatially explicit study , 2013 .

[30]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Possible impact of 2020 bioenergy targets on European Union land use. A scenario-based assessment from national renewable energy action plans proposals , 2013 .

[31]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHOOT PHENOLOGY AND DOMINANCE IN HERBACEOUS VEGETATION , 1977 .

[32]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Modelling the carbon and nitrogen balances of direct land use changes from energy crops in Denmark: a consequential life cycle inventory , 2012 .

[33]  Claus Felby,et al.  Agricultural residue production and potentials for energy and materials services , 2014 .