LEAF VALUE: EFFECTS OF DAMAGE TO INDIVIDUAL LEAVES ON GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION OF MOUNTAIN BIRCH SHOOTS

Most damage caused by invertebrate herbivores is local and limited in extent and may therefore seem inconsequential. However, in addition to providing photosynthates to the whole plant, individual leaves may preferentially feed local sinks, including pri- mordial meristems that develop later. For leaf damage, this may have local consequences and, in the case of preformed meristems, may result in time lags. To investigate such consequences and to determine the degree of independence among shoot modules, we studied shoot traits after damage to individual leaves in long shoots and vegetative and generative short shoots of field-growing mountain birch, Betula pubescens subsp. czere- panovii (Orlova) Hamet-Ahti. For short shoots, the results suggest that, due to the catkin, generative shoots have a higher priority in resource use than vegetative shoots. The overwinter survival of vegetative short shoots was decreased after their young leaves had been damaged early in the previous season. Otherwise, there were no significant effects of leaf damage on vegetative shoots. In generative shoots, leaf damage affected size and reproduction instead of survival. Because leaf damage significantly decreased leaf size-in the generative shoots in the posttreatment year, leaves presumably competed with the catkin for resources within the shoot. Damage also reduced the catkin mass and the mean seed mass in the treatment year. In the post- treatment year, catkin mass and total seed mass were reduced by the treatments, but dif- ferences in the number of seeds and mean seed mass did not quite reach significance. The treatments had no effects on leaf mass of neighbors of vegetative or generative shoots in the treatment year or in the posttreatment year. In the treatment year, removal of long shoot leaves from a growing long shoot did not affect growth of the long shoot, indicating that such growth was supported by resources external to the shoot. However, local effects were evident in the posttreatment year: leaf mass decreased in shoots that developed from axillary buds in long shoots whose supporting leaves had been clipped in the previous year. Consequently, removal of individual leaves may have local effects on shoot survivorship, reproduction, and growth. Timing of damage and shoot type modified the consequences of local leaf damage, and there were no consistent responses for all situations. Due to the limited extent of damage, the effects were not likely to result from nutrient loss due to damage. Instead, consequences of local leaf damage could be explained largely by effects on local sinks and meristem primordia.

[1]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Effects of localized defoliations on female inflorescences in mountain birch, Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa , 1989 .

[2]  E. Haukioja,et al.  INDUCED LONG-TERM RESISTANCE OF BIRCH FOLIAGE AGAINST DEFOLIATORS: DEFENSIVE OR INCIDENTAL? , 1985 .

[3]  H. Mooney,et al.  Compensation as a Plant Response to Ozone and Associated Stresses: An Analysis of ROPIS Experiments , 1994 .

[4]  J. Harper,et al.  Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits , 1979, Nature.

[5]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Effects of simulated defoliation and debudding on needle and shoot growth in Scots pine Pinus sylvestris-implications of plant source-sink relationships for plant-herbivore studies , 1994 .

[6]  J. Harper,et al.  The concept of population in modular organisms , 1981 .

[7]  Robert J. Marquis,et al.  A Bite is a Bite is a Bite? Constraints on Response to Folivory in Piper Arieianum (Piperaceae) , 1992 .

[8]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rapidly Induced Defenses and Talking Trees: The Devil's Advocate Position , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[9]  James White,et al.  THE PLANT AS A METAPOPULATION , 1979 .

[10]  R. J. Luxmoore,et al.  A source-sink framework for coupling water, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of vegetation. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[11]  P. Tomlinson,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis , 1978 .

[12]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Why does a branch suffer more after branch-wide than after tree-wide defoliation ? , 1994 .

[13]  L. Maillette,et al.  Structural Dynamics of Silver Birch. I. The Fates of Buds , 1982 .

[14]  T. Vuorisalo,et al.  Unitary and Modular Organisms: Criteria for Ecological Division , 1986 .

[15]  L. Maillette EFFECTS OF BUD DEMOGRAPHY AND ELONGATION PATTERNS ON BETULA CORDIFOLIA NEAR THE TREE LINE , 1987 .

[16]  Dan Cohen,et al.  Plants as competing populations of redundant organs , 1993 .

[17]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[18]  Thomas M. Hinckley,et al.  THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BRANCH AUTONOMY , 1991 .

[19]  T. Vuorisalo,et al.  Induced Accumulation of Foliage Phenols in Mountain Birch: Branch Response to Defoliation? , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[20]  D. Janzen Effect of Defoliation on Fruit-bearing Branches of the Kentucky Coffee Tree, Gymnoclaudus dioicus (Leguminosae) , 1976 .

[21]  R. Waring,et al.  Stem Growth per Unit of Leaf Area: A Measure of Tree Vigor , 1980 .

[22]  J. Senn,et al.  Reactions of the mountain birch to bud removal : effects of severity and timing, and implications for herbivores , 1994 .

[23]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[24]  I. F. Wardlaw,et al.  Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[25]  P. Niemelä,et al.  The Panglossian paradigm and delayed inducible accumulation of foliar phenolics in mountain birch , 1990 .

[26]  P. Karlsson,et al.  Effects of defoliation on radial stem growth and photosynthesis in the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa). , 1992 .

[27]  M. Walls,et al.  Changes in Leaf Gas Exchange Properties of Cloned Betula pendula Saplings after Partial Defoliation , 1992 .

[28]  B. Casper,et al.  MORPHOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS ON PATTERNS OF CARBON DISTRIBUTION IN PLANTS , 1984 .

[29]  J. Senn,et al.  The convergence in growth of foliage-chewing insect species on individual mountain birch trees , 1995 .

[30]  C. Foyer THE BASIS FOR SOURCE-SINK INTERACTION IN LEAVES , 1987 .

[31]  S. Larsson,et al.  Effects of shoot pruning on stem growth, needle biomass, and dynamics of carbohydrates and nitrogen in Scots pine as related to season and tree age , 1990 .

[32]  T. Kozlowski Tree Physiology and Forest Pests , 1969 .

[33]  W. Bond,et al.  The Influence of Grazing on the Evolution, Morphology and Physiology of Plants as Modular Organisms [and Discussion] , 1991 .

[34]  P. Niemelä,et al.  RESOURCE ALLOCATION ON DWARF SHOOTS OF BIRCH (BETULA PENDULA): REPRODUCTION AND LEAF GROWTH , 1982 .

[35]  J. Trumble,et al.  Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory , 1993 .

[36]  J. Lawton Ecology as she is done, and could be done , 1991 .

[37]  D. Layne,et al.  Physiological responses of Prunus cerasus to whole-plant source manipulation. Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, water relations and carbohydrate concentrations. , 1993 .

[38]  J. Tuomi,et al.  Bud Demography of the Mountain Birch Betula Pubescens Ssp. Tortuosa Near Tree Line , 1994 .

[39]  T. Kozlowski,et al.  SHOOT GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS OF HETEROPHYLLOUS WOODY PLANTS , 1966 .

[40]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants , 1990 .