The Enactive Approach

There is a small but growing community of researchers spanning a spectrum of disciplines which are united in rejecting the still dominant computationalist paradigm in favor of the enactive approach. The framework of this approach is centered on a core set of ideas, such as autonomy, sense-making, emergence, embodiment, and experience. These concepts are finding novel applications in a diverse range of areas. One hot topic has been the establishment of an enactive approach to social interaction. The main purpose of this paper is to serve as an advanced entry point into these recent developments. It accomplishes this task in a twofold manner: (i) it provides a succinct synthesis of the most important core ideas and arguments in the theoretical framework of the enactive approach, and (ii) it uses this synthesis to refine the current enactive approach to social interaction. A new operational definition of social interaction is proposed which not only emphasizes the cognitive agency of the individuals and the irreducibility of the interaction process itself, but also the need for jointly co-regulated action. It is suggested that this revised conception of ‘socio-cognitive interaction’ may provide the necessary middle ground from which to understand the confluence of biological and cultural values in personal action.

[1]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science , 2012 .

[2]  A. Clark,et al.  Introduction: Mind Embodied, Embedded, Enacted: One Church or Many? , 2009 .

[3]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Locked-in syndrome: a challenge for embodied cognitive science , 2013, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  A. Fogel Developing through relationships origins of communication, self, and culture , 1993 .

[5]  F. Varela Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[6]  E. Thompson,et al.  Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories , 2009 .

[7]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Chapter 3 Overcoming Autopoiesis: An Enactive Detour on the Way from Life to Society , 2010 .

[8]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Can social interaction constitute social cognition? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  M. Egbert Bacterial Chemotaxis: Introverted or Extroverted? A Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Basic Forms of Metabolism-Based and Metabolism-Independent Behavior Using a Computational Model , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  M. Wheeler Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step , 2005 .

[11]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[12]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Editorial: The social and enactive mind , 2009 .

[13]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[14]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency , 2005 .

[15]  Daniel D. Hutto Knowing What? Radical Versus Conservative Enactivism , 2005 .

[16]  Pierre Steiner,et al.  From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life , 2009 .

[17]  Natika Newton The art of representation: Support for an enactive approach , 2004 .

[18]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences - Cognition , 2004 .

[19]  F. Varela,et al.  Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[21]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Norm-Establishing and Norm-Following in Autonomous Agency , 2014, Artificial Life.

[22]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[23]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Enactivism is not interactionism , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Tom Froese,et al.  On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[25]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Participatory sense-making , 2007 .

[26]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science , 2010 .

[27]  David Kirsh,et al.  Today the Earwig, Tomorrow Man? , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Steve Torrance,et al.  In search of the enactive: Introduction to special issue on enactive experience , 2005 .

[29]  M. Kilduff Making Sense of Sense Making , 1996 .

[30]  S. Gallagher Direct perception in the intersubjective context , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  Tom Froese,et al.  Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis , 2009 .

[32]  E. Thompson,et al.  Mind in life : biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind , 2007 .

[33]  Evan Thompson,et al.  Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela , 2004 .

[34]  Rafael Núñez,et al.  Enacting Infinity: Bringing Transfinite Cardinals into Being , 2010 .

[35]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[36]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Adaptivity: From Metabolism to Behavior , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[37]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[38]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[39]  Igor B. Zhulin,et al.  More Than One Way To Sense Chemicals , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[40]  Stephen J. Cowley,et al.  Distributed Language: Biomechanics, Functions, and the Origins of Talk , 2007 .

[41]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[42]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Making Sense in Participation: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition , 2008 .

[43]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty The structure of behavior , 1963 .

[44]  Tom Froese,et al.  Stability of Coordination Requires Mutuality of Interaction in a Model of Embodied Agents , 2008, SAB.

[45]  Adrian G. Palacios,et al.  A TRIBUTE TO FRANCISCO VARELA , 2003 .

[46]  Geoffrey Hunter What Computers Can't Do , 1988, Philosophy.

[47]  Mark L. Johnson The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason , 1989 .

[48]  Thomas Fuchs,et al.  Are Mental Illnesses Diseases of the Brain , 2011 .

[49]  A. Goldman,et al.  Is social cognition embodied? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Lawrence A. Shapiro Embodied Cognition , 2010 .

[51]  J. Stewart Foundational Issues in Enaction as a Paradigm for Cognitive Science: From the Origin of Life to Consciousness and Writing , 2010 .

[52]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[53]  I. Kant,et al.  Critique of judgment , 2000 .

[54]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  A Minimal Model of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  C. Jung,et al.  Four Archetypes: Mother, Rebirth, Spirit, Trickster , 1971 .

[56]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  The interactive brain hypothesis , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  H. Jonas The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology , 1966 .

[58]  F. Varela Organism: A Meshwork of Selfless Selves , 1991 .

[59]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[60]  Steve Torrance Introduction to the second special issue on enactive experience , 2007 .

[61]  S. Gallagher Two problems of intersubjectivity , 2009 .

[62]  Thomas Fuchs,et al.  The Ghost in the Machine: Disembodiment in Schizophrenia – Two Case Studies , 2010, Psychopathology.

[63]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[64]  E. Thompson Mind in Life , 2007 .

[65]  E. Thompson,et al.  Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience , 2005 .

[66]  Evan Thompson Living Ways of Sense Making , 2011 .

[67]  Alva Noë,et al.  Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness , 2009 .

[68]  Evan Thompson,et al.  Brain in a Vat or Body in a World? Brainbound versus Enactive Views of Experience , 2011 .

[69]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Defining Agency: Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry, and Spatio-temporality in Action , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[70]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[71]  Didier Bottineau,et al.  Language and enaction , 2008 .

[72]  Colwyn Trevarthen,et al.  Consciousness in infants , 2007 .

[73]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[74]  A. Clark,et al.  Supersizing The Mind Embodiment Action And Cognitive Extension Andy Clark , 2016 .

[75]  Quassim Cassam The Embodied Self , 2011 .

[76]  M. Rohde,et al.  Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play , 2010 .

[77]  M. Wheeler In Defense of Extended Functionalism , 2010 .

[78]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[79]  F. Varela Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[80]  Tom Froese,et al.  Toward Minimally Social Behavior: Social Psychology Meets Evolutionary Robotics , 2009, ECAL.

[81]  Jakob von Uexküll,et al.  A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds , 1992 .

[82]  P. Sargent Two case studies , 1972 .

[83]  Evan Thompson,et al.  Empathy and consciousness. , 2001 .

[84]  M. Boden,et al.  Mind As Machine: A History of Cognitive Science Two-Volume Set , 2006 .

[85]  F. Varela,et al.  Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality , 2002 .

[86]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  Behavioral Metabolution: The Adaptive and Evolutionary Potential of Metabolism-Based Chemotaxis , 2011, Artificial Life.

[87]  Dario Taraborelli,et al.  Action-dependent perceptual invariants: From ecological to sensorimotor approaches , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[88]  Darren Langdridge,et al.  The Child's Relations with Others , 2005 .

[89]  Evan Thompson,et al.  The Mind-Body-Body Problem , 2007 .

[90]  Daniel D. Hutto,et al.  Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content , 2012 .

[91]  M. Auvray,et al.  Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment , 2009 .

[92]  Ralph D. Ellis,et al.  Phenomenology-Friendly Neuroscience: The Return To Merleau-Ponty As Psychologist , 2006 .

[93]  Xabier E. Barandiaran,et al.  On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive: A Minimally Cognitive Organization Program , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[94]  Tom Froese,et al.  Modelling social interaction as perceptual crossing: an investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process , 2010, Connect. Sci..

[95]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..