EXPECTATIONS CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BIG DATA TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATIONS

Implementation of Big Data in organisations is often connected to high expectations and investment in advanced technology and methods for analysis. This case study explores expectations for and perspectives on the implementation of Big Data in the Norwegian Building Authority (DiBK), to support the development and interpretation of regulations. The study is based on semi-structured interviews with stakeholders in DiBK and an exploration of a pilot study by an external consultancy company. The theoretical framework for analysis is based on Integrated Design and Delivery Solution (IDDS), which focuses on: 1) integrated processes, 2) collaboration with people, and 3) interoperable technologies. The outcome shows variations in the interpretation of Big Data. This understanding is significant in relation to support in reuse of existing analyse, participation new projects and trust in outcome of Big Data based analyses. The expectations to outcome of Big Data analysis should be related to improved understanding of the complex mechanisms between the design of regulations and experiences with various technical building solutions, rather than trying to answer detailed questions on the relation between a single type of building damage and a specific paragraph in the regulations. The development of a road map for the continuous implementation and involvement of Big Data should be preferred, instead of the traditional master project implementation strategy. Increased use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and sensors based on the Internet of things (IoT) can enable the increased and continuous capture of data into a joint fact based foundation. The use of Big Data has the potential to support changes to the processes of how regulations are drafted and how public regulations can interact with marked-driven aspects that have influence on quality of buildings and building products.

[1]  Robert Owen,et al.  Integrated Design and Delivery Solutions , 2010 .

[2]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Mis problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective , 1977 .

[3]  Chris Argyris Double-Loop Learning , 2015 .

[4]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Business Analytics: Radical Shift or Incremental Change? , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Design matters for decision makers: Discovering IT investment alternatives , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[7]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions, Better Results , 2010 .

[8]  David Shepherd The BIM Management Handbook , 2016 .

[9]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[10]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Big Data , 2014, Wirtschaftsinf..

[11]  Maria R. Lee,et al.  Leveraging Big Data and Business Analytics , 2013, IT Prof..

[12]  Magdalena Balazinska Big data research , 2015, VLDB 2015.

[13]  Zehra Waheed Capture and Reuse of Project Knowledge in Construction , 2016 .

[14]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[15]  A. Tattersall,et al.  Big Data - What is it and why it matters. , 2016, Health information and libraries journal.

[16]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Internet of Things , 2015, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[17]  Mark van Rijmenam,et al.  Think Bigger: Developing a Successful Big Data Strategy for Your Business , 2014 .

[18]  I. Yeoman Competing on analytics: The new science of winning , 2009 .

[19]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Transforming Decision-Making Processes Transforming decision-making processes : a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organizations , 2017 .