Duration and Frequency Characteristics of Tracheoesophageal Speech

Selected characteristics were compared in the speech of five tracheoesophageal, five esophageal, and 15 normal laryngeal adult speakers. Tape-recorded speech samples were measured for durational features with a stopwatch. Frequency features were analyzed with a Visi-Pitch/Apple IIE computer interface with statistical subroutines. Tracheoesophageal speech proved comparable to normal speech in maximum phonation time, speech rate, pitch pertubation (jitter), average fundamental frequency, and fundamental frequency range, but less efficient than normal speech in phrase grouping. Tracheoesophageal speech was superior to esophageal speech in maximum phonation time, speech rate, and phrase grouping, but not significantly different in pitch perturbation, average fundamental frequency, and fundamental frequency range. Explanations and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  J. Costello Speech disorders in adults : recent advances , 1985 .

[2]  Y Horii,et al.  Vocal shimmer in sustained phonation. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  M. Singer,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[4]  Y. Horii Jitter and shimmer differences among sustained vowel phonations. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  S. Bennett,et al.  Selected acoustic characteristics of esophageal speech produced by female laryngectomees. , 1972, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.

[6]  M. Singer,et al.  Selected acoustic features of tracheoesophageal, esophageal, and laryngeal speech. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[7]  B Weinberg,et al.  Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  T. Shipp,et al.  Frequency, duration, and perceptual measures in relation to judgments of alaryngeal speech acceptability. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  J Robbins,et al.  Acoustic differentiation of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  M Hyman,et al.  Relationship of Acoustic Parameters and Perceptual Ratings of Esophageal Speech , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Multiple-choice intelligibility tests, forms A and B. , 1963, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[12]  A Holbrook,et al.  Modal vocal fundamental frequency of young adults. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.

[13]  Y. Koike Application of Some Acoustic Measures for the Evaluation of Laryngeal Dysfunction , 1967 .

[14]  E. T. Curry,et al.  How effectively can the laryngectomee expect to speak? , 1960, The Laryngoscope.