A DEA BASED SORTING APPROACH FOR INDUSTRIAL R&D PROJECTS

.............................................................................iv ÖZ..........................................................................................vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................ix TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................x LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................xiv LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................xvii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS......................................................xviii CHAPTERS

[1]  J. Barzilai.  Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 1997 .

[2]  Z. H. Che,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and DEA approach for making bank loan decisions for small and medium enterprises in Taiwan , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Mehpare Timor,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications , 2010 .

[4]  Abdulaziz S. Alidi,et al.  Use of the analytic hierarchy process to measure the initial viability of industrial projects , 1996 .

[5]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Multiobjective target setting in data envelopment analysis using AHP , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  Tzu-An Chiang,et al.  A fuzzy robust evaluation model for selecting and ranking NPD projects using Bayesian belief network and weight-restricted DEA , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  N. Bryson,et al.  An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems , 1997 .

[8]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[9]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection☆ , 2008 .

[11]  Bruce L. Golden,et al.  Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  J. Linton,et al.  Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio , 2002 .

[13]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  An Experiment on the Numerical Modelling of Verbal Ratio Statements , 1997 .

[15]  George Mavrotas,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis with minimum information: combining DEA with MAVT , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Identifying Excesses and Deficits in Chinese Industrial Productivity (1953-1990): a Weighted Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 1998 .

[19]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo , 2003 .

[20]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Cross-Evaluation in DEA - Improving Discrimiation Among DMUs , 1995 .

[21]  Juscelino Almeida Dias,et al.  Laboratoire D'analyse Et Modélisation De Systèmes Pour L'aide À La Décision Cahier Du Lamsade 274 Electre Tri-c: a Multiple Criteria Sorting Method Based on Characteristic Reference Actions Electre Tri-c: a Multiple Criteria Sorting Method Based on Characteristic Reference Actions , 2022 .

[22]  Han-Lin Li,et al.  A fuzzy ranking method with range reduction techniques , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[25]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Review of Methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[26]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  ADDRESSING WITH BREVITY CRITICISMS OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2009 .

[27]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Value efficiency analysis of academic research , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  A qualitative perspective to deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 2010 .

[30]  M. Köksalan,et al.  A new outranking‐based approach for assigning alternatives to ordered classes , 2009 .

[31]  S. K. Mayo.  Improving the Discrimination od Synthetic Discriminant Filters , 1988, Pattern Recognition.

[32]  I. Ozkarahan,et al.  Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure , 2007 .

[33]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods , 2002 .

[34]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .

[35]  Geoff Lockett,et al.  Modelling a Research Portfolio Using AHP: A Group Decision Process , 1986 .

[36]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[37]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[38]  Vladislav V. Podinovski,et al.  Interval articulation of superiority and precise elicitation of priorities , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Gholam R. Amin,et al.  Railway station site selection using analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  R. P. Mohanty.  Project selection by a multiple-criteria decision-making method: an example from a developing country , 1992 .

[42]  J. Barzilai,et al.  Ahp Rank Reversal, Normalization and Aggregation Rules , 1994 .

[43]  Esra Karasakal,et al.  R&D Project Performance Evaluation With Multiple and Interdependent Criteria , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[44]  Ami Arbel,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation , 1989 .

[45]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Identifying ''best'' applicants in recruiting using data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[46]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[47]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A linear programming method for generating the most favorable weights from a pairwise comparison matrix , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[48]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[50]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Demystifying DEA — A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multiple Criteria Analysis , 1993 .

[51]  Jian Lin,et al.  An information mining method for deriving weights from an interval comparison matrix , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[52]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[53]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[54]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[56]  A. Lawrence Kolbe,et al.  When Choosing R&D Projects, Go with Long Shots , 1991 .

[57]  J. Z. Shyu,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Selection of Government-Sponsored Frontier Technology R&D Projects , 2003 .

[58]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process , 1997 .

[59]  Marvin D. Troutt,et al.  Derivation of the Maximin Efficiency Ratio model from the maximum decisional efficiency principle , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[60]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[61]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[62]  Eduardo Conde,et al.  A linear optimization problem to derive relative weights using an interval judgement matrix , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[63]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A data envelopment analysis method with assurance region for weight generation in the analytic hierarchy process , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[65]  Kazim Baris Atici,et al.  Efficiency evaluations with context-dependent and measure-specific data envelopment approaches: An application in a World Bank supported project ☆ , 2010 .

[66]  J. Martino.  Research and Development project selection , 1995 .

[67]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1996 .

[68]  Juscelino Almeida Dias,et al.  A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[69]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[70]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[71]  João Paulo Costa,et al.  Using ELECTRE TRI outranking method to sort MOMILP nondominated solutions , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[72]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: a case study in IROST , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[73]  Fang-Mei Tseng,et al.  Measuring business performance in the high-tech manufacturing industry: A case study of Taiwan's large-sized TFT-LCD panel companies , 2009 .

[74]  Hanjoo Yoo,et al.  A study on the efficiency evaluation of total quality management activities in Korean companies , 2003 .

[75]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[76]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[77]  Fang Liu,et al.  Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[78]  Seong Kon Lee,et al.  Econometric analysis of the R&D performance in the national hydrogen energy technology development for measuring relative efficiency: The fuzzy AHP/DEA integrated model approach , 2010 .

[79]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Information systems project prioritization using data envelopment analysis , 2005, Math. Comput. Model..

[80]  Hasan Bal,et al.  Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[81]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[82]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[83]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Chapter 15 DEA/AR analysis of the 1988–1989 performance of the Nanjing textiles corporation , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[84]  Jukka Korpela,et al.  Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies , 2007 .

[85]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  On lexicographic goal programming method for generating weights from inconsistent interval comparison matrices , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[86]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation , 1993 .

[87]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[88]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  R&D Project Selection in a Multidimensional Environment: A Practical Approach , 1982 .

[89]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[90]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[91]  J. Antony,et al.  Modified analytic hierarchy process to incorporate uncertainty and managerial aspects , 2004 .

[92]  R. Revans.  Action learning , 1982, Action Learning and Action Research: Genres and Approaches.

[93]  John G. Porter.  Post Audits — An Aid to Research Planning , 1978 .

[94]  Reuven R. Levary,et al.  A simulation approach for handling uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[95]  Tzai-Zang Lee,et al.  Comparing appropriate decision support of human resource practices on organizational performance with DEA/AHP model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[96]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization , 2008, Appl. Math. Comput..

[97]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units , 2000 .

[98]  K. Hipel,et al.  A multiple criteria sequential sorting procedure , 2008 .

[99]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  A Dea Model For Measuring The Relative Eeficiency Of Highway Maintenance Patrols , 1990 .

[100]  Taho Yang,et al.  A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[101]  Hasan Bal,et al.  A new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[102]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[103]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[104]  Adrien Presley,et al.  R&D project selection using the analytic network process , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[105]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  A bibliography for Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-1996) , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[106]  J. Wallenius,et al.  A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999 .

[107]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[108]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Interval judgments and Euclidean centers , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[109]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  A Multicriteria Decision Aid Methodology for Sorting Decision Problems: The Case of Financial Distress , 1999 .

[110]  R. P. Mohanty,et al.  A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: A case study , 2005 .

[111]  Stan Schenkerman,et al.  Inducement of Nonexistent Order by the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1997 .