Peer Effects in Unethical Behavior: Standing or Reputation?

Recent empirical evidence shows that working in an unsupervised, isolated situation under competition, can increase dishonest behavior to achieve prestige. However, could working in a common space, in the presence of colleagues affect cheating? Here, we examine how familiar-peer influence, supervision and social incentives affect worker performance and dishonest behavior. First, we show that working in the presence of peers is an effective mechanism to constrain honest/dishonest behavior compared to an isolated work situation (experiment 1). Second, we demonstrate that the mere suspicion of dishonesty from another peer is not enough to affect individual cheating behavior (experiment 2), suggesting that reputation holds great importance in a worker’s self-image acting as a strong social incentives. Third, we show that when the suspicion of dishonesty increases with multiple peers behaving dishonestly, the desire to increase standing is sufficient to nudge individuals’ behavior back to cheating at the same levels as isolated situations (experiment 3).

[1]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Motivation, money, prestige and cheats , 2022 .

[2]  Chungsang Lam.  Estimating Various Kinds of Peer Effects on Academic Performance ∗ † , 2012 .

[3]  Nina Mazar,et al.  Large stakes and big mistakes , 2009 .

[4]  Dan Ariely,et al.  The Effect of One Bad Apple on the Barrel , 2009 .

[5]  D. Ariely,et al.  Man's search for meaning: The case of Legos , 2008 .

[6]  Christiane Schwieren,et al.  Does Competition Enhance Performance or Cheating? A Laboratory Experiment , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  J. E. West,et al.  Peer Effects in Academic Cheating , 2005, The Journal of Human Resources.

[8]  Eth,et al.  Monitoring , Motivation , and Management : The Determinants of Opportunistic Behavior in a Field Experiment , 2008 .

[9]  David S. Lyle.  Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[10]  A. Falk,et al.  The hidden costs of control , 2006 .

[11]  Gigi Foster.  It's not your peers, and it's not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism , 2006 .

[12]  A. Ichino,et al.  Clean Evidence on Peer Effects , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Gender and competition at a young age , 2004 .

[14]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Peer Effects in North Carolina Public Schools , 2004 .

[15]  D. Zimmerman.  Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  Maurice E. Schweitzer,et al.  Stretching the Truth: Elastic Justification and Motivated Communication of Uncertain Information , 2006 .

[17]  Michael A. Boozer,et al.  Inside the 'Black Box' of Project Star: Estimation of Peer Effects Using Experimental Data , 2001 .

[18]  A. Rustichini,et al.  A Fine is a Price , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[19]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[20]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Reputation, Image, Prestige, and Goodwill: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Organizational Standing , 1997 .

[21]  C. Manski.  Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[22]  Eui Hang Shin,et al.  A network analysis of departmental prestige based on the origins of faculty degrees , 1982 .

[23]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .