Video quality in next generation mobile networks — Perception of time-varying transmission

Next Generation Mobile Networks (NGMNs) provide an all-IP wireless platform for multimedia service delivery. The integrated communication system creates new perspectives for wireless video distribution and quality provisioning. Depending on the mobility patterns of the nomadic users, the link layer characteristics may rapidly change. Furthermore, mobility and service adaptation events like network handovers, video bit rate switching, or codec changeovers, may affect the user perception. Provisioning “always best connected” video services requires a thorough knowledge of video quality perception in NGMNs. In this paper, we address this problem. A subjective test including 50 NGMN conditions has been carried out. They were arranged in groups to assess the impact on perceived quality of 1) the access technology and network handover, 2) video codecs and codec changeover, 3) video bit rate and bit rate switching, and 4) to provide guidelines for packet loss adaptation. We could identify the perceptual bottlenecks of the future wireless communication and are able to propose perceptual guidelines for mobility management. In this way, this paper contributes to the service quality improvement of future wireless communications.

[1]  Andreas Kassler,et al.  Adaptive media streaming in heterogeneous wireless networks , 2004, IEEE 6th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 2004..

[2]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  The Routerlab - Emulating Internet Characteristics in a Room , 2010 .

[3]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Speech Quality While Roaming in Next Generation Networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[4]  Sandor Imre,et al.  Analysing GOP structure and packet loss effects on error propagation in MPEG-4 video streams , 2010, 2010 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[5]  Christos Bouras,et al.  Adaptive and reliable video transmission over UMTS for enhanced performance , 2007, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[6]  Vincent Barriac,et al.  Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Mobisense testbed: merging user perception and network performance , 2008, TRIDENTCOM.

[8]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Quality of Experience Measurements for Video Streaming over Wireless Networks , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[9]  M. Boulmalf,et al.  Experimental analysis of video performance over wireless local area networks , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems.

[10]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Rate-constrained coder control and comparison of video coding standards , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[11]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  Application-layer mobility using SIP , 2000, MOCO.

[12]  Lingfen Sun,et al.  Quality of experience-driven adaptation scheme for video applications over wireless networks , 2010, IET Commun..

[13]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  A Technique for Seamless VoIP-Codec Switching in Next Generation Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[14]  Jae-Young Pyun Context-Aware Streaming Video System for Vertical Handover over Wireless Overlay Network , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[15]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  The Evolution of Video Quality Measurement: From PSNR to Hybrid Metrics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[16]  Alexander Raake,et al.  Speech Quality of VoIP - Assessment and Prediction , 2006 .

[17]  Jianfei Cai,et al.  Three Dimensional Scalable Video Adaptation via User-End Perceptual Quality Assessment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.