Best Practices for Virtual Engagement of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Teams During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study

Background Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) engages patients as partners in research and focuses on questions and outcomes that are important to patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced PCOR teams to engage through web-based platforms rather than in person. Similarly, virtual engagement is the only safe alternative for members of the cystic fibrosis (CF) community, who spend their lives following strict infection control guidelines and are already restricted from in-person interactions. In the absence of universal best practices, the CF community has developed its own guidelines to help PCOR teams engage through web-based platforms. Objective This study aimed to identify the important attributes, facilitators, and barriers to teams when selecting web-based platforms. Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with CF community members, nonprofit stakeholders, and researchers to obtain information regarding their experience with using web-based platforms, including the effectiveness and efficiency of these platforms and their satisfaction with and confidence while using each platform. Interviews conducted via Zoom were audio recorded and transcribed. We identified key themes through content analysis with an iterative, inductive, and deductive coding process. Results In total, 15 participants reported using web-based platforms for meetings, project management, document sharing, scheduling, and communication. When selecting web-based platforms, participants valued their accessibility, ease of use, and integration with other platforms. Participants speculated that successful web-based collaboration involved platforms that emulate in-person interactions, recognized the digital literacy levels of the team members, intentionally aligned platforms with collaboration goals, and achieved team member buy-in to adopt new platforms. Conclusions Successful web-based engagement in PCOR requires the use of multiple platforms in order to fully meet the asynchronous or synchronous goals of the project. This study identified the key attributes for the successful practice of PCOR on web-based platforms and the common challenges and solutions associated with their use. Our findings provide the best practices for selecting platforms and the lessons learned through web-based PCOR collaborations.

[1]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Covid-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at Us Data , 2020 .

[2]  Adam Ozimek,et al.  The Future of Remote Work , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  E. Meier,et al.  Sickle cell disease related internet activity is three times less frequent than cystic fibrosis related internet activity , 2016, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[4]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[5]  Susan Harker,et al.  ISO 9241-11 Revised: What Have We Learnt About Usability Since 1998? , 2015, HCI.

[6]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  How to make distance work work , 2014, INTR.

[7]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[8]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Thinking outside the box a vision of ambient learning displays , 2011 .

[9]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Go (Con)Figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  R. Ravert,et al.  'I have cystic fibrosis': an analysis of web-based disclosures of a chronic illness. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[12]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[13]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[14]  E. Tolley,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research , 2004 .

[15]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace , 2002, CSCW '02.

[16]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[17]  Mandalay Grems,et al.  Standards , 1987, CACM.

[18]  James Howison,et al.  Strategies for Success in Virtual Collaboration: Structures and Norms for Meetings, Workflow, and Technological Platforms , 2019, Strategies for Team Science Success.

[19]  Kirstin K. Holsman,et al.  Trade‐offs in covariate selection for species distribution models: a methodological comparison , 2019, Ecography.

[20]  J. Selby,et al.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute , 2017 .

[21]  Ali Gürkan,et al.  Virtual Team Collaboration: A Review of Literature and Perspectives , 2010, AMCIS.

[22]  M. Nystrom Independent Consultant , 1996 .

[23]  J. Jeljaszewicz [Cross infection]. , 1978, Polski tygodnik lekarski.