Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions

Neuroimaging studies have identified multiple face-selective regions in human cortex but the functional division of labor between these regions is not yet clear. A central hypothesis, with some empirical support, is that face-selective regions in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are particularly responsive to dynamic information in faces, whereas the fusiform face area (FFA) computes the static or invariant properties of faces. Here we directly tested this hypothesis by measuring the magnitude of response in each region to both dynamic and static stimuli. Consistent with the hypothesis, we found that the response to movies of faces was not significantly different from the response to static images of faces from these same movies in the right FFA and right occipital face area (OFA). By contrast the face-selective region in the right posterior STS (pSTS) responded nearly three times as strongly to dynamic faces as to static faces, and a face-selective region in the right anterior STS (aSTS) responded to dynamic faces only. Both of these regions also responded more strongly to moving faces than to moving bodies, indicating that they are preferentially engaged in processing dynamic information from faces, not in more general processing of any dynamic social stimuli. The response to dynamic and static faces was not significantly different in a third face-selective region in the posterior continuation of the STS (pcSTS). The strong selectivity of face-selective regions in the pSTS and aSTS, but not the FFA, OFA or pcSTS, for dynamic face information demonstrates a clear functional dissociation between different face-selective regions, and provides further clues into their function.

[1]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  D. Perrett,et al.  A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust , 1997, Nature.

[3]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Distributed representations of dynamic facial expressions in the superior temporal sulcus. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[4]  R. Dolan,et al.  Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule , 2007, Current Biology.

[5]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  How Distributed Is Visual Category Information in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex? An fMRI Study , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Emiliano Ricciardi,et al.  Distinct Neural Systems Involved in Agency and Animacy Detection , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Familiarity decisions for faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Gross,et al.  Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[17]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[18]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  T. Allison,et al.  Functional anatomy of biological motion perception in posterior temporal cortex: an FMRI study of eye, mouth and hand movements. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  T. Allison,et al.  Erratum to “Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context” [Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 156–170] , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Location, Location, Location: Alterations in the Functional Topography of Face- but not Object- or Place-Related Cortex in Adolescents with Autism , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[25]  J. Cohn,et al.  Deciphering the Enigmatic Face , 2005, Psychological science.

[26]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Perrett,et al.  A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  M. Brass,et al.  Investigating Action Understanding: Inferential Processes versus Action Simulation , 2007, Current Biology.

[29]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention investigated with fMRI and MEG , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Dissociation of extrastriate body and biological-motion selective areas by manipulation of visual-motor congruency , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual Imagery of Famous Faces: Effects of Memory and Attention Revealed by fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Let’s face it: It’s a cortical network , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Somatosensation in social perception , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[37]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Adolphs Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms. , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Functional Compartmentalization and Viewpoint Generalization Within the Macaque Face-Processing System , 2010, Science.

[41]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[42]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Facial expression and gaze-direction in human superior temporal sulcus , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[44]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[47]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[48]  E. Vul,et al.  Begging the Question: The Nonindependence Error in fMRI Data Analysis , 2010 .

[49]  J. Devlin,et al.  Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[50]  A. Ishai,et al.  Year : 2008 Let ' s face it : it ' s a cortical , 2008 .

[51]  Christopher J. Fox,et al.  Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[52]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[53]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Action Understanding in the Superior Temporal Sulcus Region , 2009, Psychological science.