The nature of the auxiliary system in English has drawn much attention in the past fifteen years because it involve fundamental issues in linguistic theory, such as categories and the nature of levels of representation. This article presents an analysis of the English auxiliary system within the framework of Lexical-Functional Grammar (cf. Bresnan 1982c). By presenting explicit representations and explicit rules (syntactic and lexical), we find that an analysis incorporating a distinction between Modals and Verbs, in which auxiliaries like have and be belong to one of these categories depending on inflectional properties of particular forms, can explain all the relevant facts about auxiliaries that have appeared in the literature, Explicit analyses for 'irregular' auxiliaries like ought and used to are also provided.*
[1]
J. Ross.
Auxiliaries as main verbs
,
1969
.
[2]
Ray Jackendoff,et al.
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
,
1972
.
[3]
Some Notes on English Modals
,
1976
.
[4]
Michael K. Brame.
Conjectures and refutations in syntax and semantics
,
1976
.
[5]
Deirdre Wilson,et al.
AUTONOMOUS SYNTAX AND ANALYSIS OF AUXILIARIES
,
1977
.
[6]
I. Sag,et al.
Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar
,
1982
.
[7]
Stanley Peters,et al.
Cross-Serial Dependencies in Dutch
,
1982
.