Meta‐analysis of survival curve data using distributed health data networks: application to hip arthroplasty studies of the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries

The motivating example for this paper comes from a distributed health data network, the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries (ICOR), which aims to examine risk factors for orthopedic device failure for registries around the world. Unfortunately, regulatory, privacy, and propriety concerns made sharing of raw data impossible, even if de-identified. Therefore, this article describes an approach to extraction and analysis of aggregate time-to-event data from ICOR. Data extraction is based on obtaining a survival probability and variance estimate for each unique combination of the explanatory variables at each distinct event time for each registry. The extraction procedure allows for a great deal of flexibility; models can be specified after the data have been collected, for example, modeling of interaction effects and selection of subgroups of patients based on their values on the explanatory variables. Our analysis models are adapted from models presented elsewhere--but allowing for censoring in the calculation of the correlation between serial survival probabilities and using the square root of the covariance matrix to transform the data to avoid computational problems in model estimation. Simulations and a real-data example are provided with strengths and limitations of the approach discussed.

[1]  L. Hedges,et al.  Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[2]  T. Wright,et al.  The International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: overview and summary. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Meta‐analysis of summary survival curve data , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Modeling multivariate effect sizes. , 1988 .

[5]  C Combescure,et al.  Meta-analysis of two-arm studies: Modeling the intervention effect from survival probabilities , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  K. Dear,et al.  Iterative generalized least squares for meta-analysis of survival data at multiple times. , 1994, Biometrics.

[7]  S Chevret,et al.  Misspecified regression model for the subdistribution hazard of a competing risk , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Gary G Koch,et al.  A non‐parametric procedure for evaluating treatment effect in the meta‐analysis of survival data , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  Danica Marinac-Dabic,et al.  The international registry infrastructure for cardiovascular device evaluation and surveillance. , 2013, JAMA.

[10]  B. Efron The Efficiency of Cox's Likelihood Function for Censored Data , 1977 .

[11]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  R. Platt,et al.  Distributed Health Data Networks: A Practical and Preferred Approach to Multi-Institutional Evaluations of Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Quality of Care , 2010, Medical care.

[13]  Paula R Williamson,et al.  Aggregate data meta‐analysis with time‐to‐event outcomes , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis. , 1996 .

[15]  Richard Platt,et al.  Design of a National Distributed Health Data Network , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  F Mosteller,et al.  Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.