Essential function of Chk1 can be uncoupled from DNA damage checkpoint and replication control

Chk1 is widely known as a DNA damage checkpoint signaling protein. Unlike many other checkpoint proteins, Chk1 also plays an essential but poorly defined role in the proliferation of unperturbed cells. Activation of Chk1 after DNA damage is known to require the phosphorylation of several C-terminal residues, including the highly conserved S317 and S345 sites. To evaluate the respective roles of these individual sites and assess their contribution to the functions of Chk1, we used a gene targeting approach to introduce point mutations into the endogenous human CHK1 locus. We report that the essential and nonessential functions of Chk1 are regulated through distinct phosphorylation events and can be genetically uncoupled. The DNA damage response function of Chk1 was nonessential. Targeted mutation of S317 abrogated G2/M checkpoint activation, prevented subsequent phosphorylation of Chk1, impaired efficient progression of DNA replication forks, and increased fork stalling, but did not impact viability. Thus, the nonessential DNA damage response function of Chk1 could be unambiguously linked to its role in DNA replication control. In contrast, a CHK1 allele with mutated S345 did not support viability, indicating an essential role for this residue during the unperturbed cell cycle. A distinct, physiologic mode of S345 phosphorylation, initiated at the centrosome during unperturbed mitosis was independent of codon 317 status and mechanistically distinct from the ordered and sequential phosphorylation of serine residues on Chk1 induced by DNA damage. Our findings suggest an essential regulatory role for Chk1 phosphorylation during mitotic progression.

[1]  K. Kohri,et al.  ESSENTIAL ROLE OF CHK1 IN S PHASE PROGRESSION THROUGH REGULATION OF RNR2 EXPRESSION , 2009 .

[2]  C. Britten,et al.  G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1 targeting in the treatment of cancer , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  J. Bartek,et al.  DNA Damage-Induced Accumulation of Centrosomal Chk1 Contributes to its Checkpoint Function , 2007, Cell cycle.

[4]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Genetic knockouts and knockins in human somatic cells , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[5]  D. Gillespie,et al.  Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[6]  F. Bunz,et al.  Human cancer cells require ATR for cell cycle progression following exposure to ionizing radiation , 2007, Oncogene.

[7]  F. Bunz,et al.  Loss of ataxia telangiectasia mutated– and Rad3-related function potentiates the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on cancer cell survival , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[8]  G. Zachos,et al.  Exercising Restraints: Role of Chk1 in Regulating the Onset and Progression of Unperturbed Mitosis in Vertebrate Cells , 2007, Cell cycle.

[9]  H. Niida,et al.  Specific Role of Chk1 Phosphorylations in Cell Survival and Checkpoint Activation , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  J. Bartek,et al.  Structure meets function--centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[11]  Jiabin Tang,et al.  Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is required for mitotic progression through negative regulation of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  V. Smits.  Spreading the Signal: Dissociation of Chk1 from Chromatin , 2006, Cell cycle.

[13]  J. Bartek,et al.  Regulation of mitotic function of Chk1 through phosphorylation at novel sites by cyclin‐dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) , 2006, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[14]  S. Jackson,et al.  Rapid PIKK-Dependent Release of Chk1 from Chromatin Promotes the DNA-Damage Checkpoint Response , 2006, Current Biology.

[15]  F. Bunz,et al.  Improved methods for the generation of human gene knockout and knockin cell lines , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  J. Bartek,et al.  Inhibition of Human Chk1 Causes Increased Initiation of DNA Replication, Phosphorylation of ATR Targets, and DNA Breakage , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  T. Pandita,et al.  Lack of PTEN sequesters CHK1 and initiates genetic instability. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[18]  N. Mailand,et al.  Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B–Cdk1 kinase , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  J. Rosen,et al.  Chk1 is haploinsufficient for multiple functions critical to tumor suppression. , 2004, Cancer cell.

[20]  M. Donzelli,et al.  Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation , 2003, EMBO reports.

[21]  J. Bartek,et al.  Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and NBS1-dependent Phosphorylation of Chk1 on Ser-317 in Response to Ionizing Radiation* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  D. Baltimore,et al.  Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. , 2003, Genes & development.

[23]  J. Bartek,et al.  Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[24]  J. Pines,et al.  Active cyclin B1–Cdk1 first appears on centrosomes in prophase , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  H. Piwnica-Worms,et al.  ATR-Mediated Checkpoint Pathways Regulate Phosphorylation and Activation of Human Chk1 , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  P. O'Connor,et al.  The 1.7 A crystal structure of human cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1: implications for Chk1 regulation. , 2001, Cell.

[27]  S. Elledge,et al.  Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. , 2000, Genes & development.

[28]  N. Mailand,et al.  Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. , 2000, Science.

[29]  P. O'Connor,et al.  Implications for Chk1 Regulation: The 1.7 Å Crystal Structure of Human Cell Cycle Checkpoint Kinase Chk1 , 2000, Cell.

[30]  D. Baltimore,et al.  ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. , 2000, Genes & development.

[31]  G. Zachos,et al.  of Birmingham Chk1 requirement for high global rates of replication fork progression during normal vertebrate S phase , 2006 .