A Transition Research Perspective on Governance for Sustainability

In this chapter we present the transitions approach as an integrated perspective to understand and possibly orient our society towards sustainable development. Since the concept of sustainability is inherently normative, subjective and ambiguous, we argue that (unlike some more traditional approaches to sustainable development) we should focus on an open facilitation and stimulation of social processes towards sustainability. The transitions approach and transition management specifically, seek to deal with ongoing changes in society in an evolutionary manner so as to influence these ongoing changes in terms of speed and direction: towards sustainability. A transitions approach to explore sustainability transitions poses novel challenges for research: there are no unequivocal answers, nor it is clear how these processes should be governed. We conclude our analysis by formulating the basic research questions central to the search for governance for sustainability, and by reflecting on the role of science in sustainability transitions.

[1]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[2]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Transitions: Two steps from theory to policy , 2009 .

[3]  Carlo Jaeger,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science. , 2003 .

[4]  Suzan Dagg,et al.  Book Review: Public Participation in Sustainability Science — A Handbook, Bernd Kasemir, Jill Jäger, Carlo Jaeger and Matthew T. Gardner (Eds.) , 2003 .

[5]  Keith Pezzoli,et al.  Sustainable Development: A Transdisciplinary Overview of the Literature , 1997 .

[6]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[7]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Making Social Science Matter , 2001 .

[8]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[9]  Kofi Annan,et al.  The Challenge of Sustainable Development , 2001 .

[10]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[11]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Sustainable Development: A New(Ish) Idea for a New Century? , 2000 .

[12]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Science for Global Sustainability: Toward a New Paradigm , 2005 .

[13]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[14]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[15]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues , 2006 .

[16]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis , 2001 .

[17]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis , 1980 .

[18]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings , 2009 .

[19]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Complexity Theory and Public Management , 2008 .

[20]  Nicole Rijkens-Klomp,et al.  A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective , 2002 .

[21]  A. Wokaun,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Foreword: sustainability, energy use, and public participation , 2003 .

[22]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis : An Introduction , 2001 .

[23]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Planning for sustainable development: Insights from the literatures of political science , 1997 .

[24]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[25]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[26]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[27]  D. Loorbach.  Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[28]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis , 1979 .

[29]  Karel Mulder,et al.  Sustainable Development for Engineers: A Handbook and Resource Guide , 2011 .

[30]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[31]  John Grin,et al.  Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: the Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability , 2007 .

[32]  Ileana M. Porras.  Ozone Discourses. Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation.@@@The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change. , 1994, American Journal of International Law.

[33]  M. Redclift.  Key issues in sustainable development and learning: a critical review , 2003 .

[34]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[35]  J. Rotmans.  Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[36]  Aaron Wildavsky.  Speaking Truth to Power , 1987 .

[37]  V. Gqamane.  The Millennium Development Goals Report, 2009 , 2009 .

[38]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .

[39]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Governing as Governance , 2003 .

[40]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[41]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[42]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .