Patient anatomy predicts operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES The influence of patient thoracic anatomy on operative times in robotic total endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) has not been well described. The aim of this study was to determine whether patient anatomy correlates with intraoperative time required to complete various procedural steps and overall operative time in TECAB. METHODS Preoperative multislice computed tomographic scans of the chest from 107 consecutive patients who underwent single-vessel TECAB were reviewed to measure a series of thoracic dimensions and relations. Measurements were correlated with time to complete various intraoperative procedural tasks as well as overall operative time. RESULTS There was a significant correlation between left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvest time and depth of subcutaneous tissue at the level of the nipple (r = 0.24, P = 0.018). Pericardial fat pad thickness was associated with longer resection times (r = 0.266, P = 0.008). LIMA to left anterior descending artery anastomotic time was inversely correlated with the distance from the left heart border to the chest wall (r = -0.241, P = 0.016). Total operative time was also inversely correlated with this distance (r = -0.275, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Anatomical measurements made on preoperative computed tomography in patients undergoing robotic TECAB can predict time requirements for various procedural steps. A shorter distance between the chest wall and the heart predicts longer anastomotic and total operative times. This information could assist the TECAB surgeon with surgical planning and help guide the TECAB trainee in patient selection.

[1]  T. Peters,et al.  Investigating Perioperative Heart Migration during Robot-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Interventions , 2011, Innovations.

[2]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Quality of Life Improvement after Robotically Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 2009, Cardiology.

[3]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Evaluation of ascending aortic atherosclerosis with 16-multidetector computed tomography is useful before total endoscopic coronary bypass surgery. , 2006, The heart surgery forum.

[4]  B. Griffith,et al.  Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting for spontaneous coronary artery dissection , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[5]  G. Friedrich,et al.  Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  V. Falk,et al.  Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  Jean Jeudy,et al.  Totally endoscopic quadruple coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible using robotic technology. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  B. Griffith,et al.  Robotic totally endoscopic triple coronary artery bypass grafting on the arrested heart: report of the first successful clinical case. , 2010, The heart surgery forum.

[9]  Rajni V. Patel,et al.  Preoperative Evaluation of Patient Anatomy to Increase Success of Robotics-Assisted Bypass Surgery , 2010, Innovations.

[10]  Thomas Schachner,et al.  Robotically Assisted Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass Surgery , 2011, Circulation.

[11]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Multislice computed tomography for preoperative and postoperative assessment in totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2007, The heart surgery forum.

[12]  G. Laufer,et al.  Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  Robotically Assisted Coronary Endarterectomy , 2011, Innovations.

[14]  C. Kolbitsch,et al.  Single-lung ventilation time does not increase lung injury after totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2010, The heart surgery forum.

[15]  D. Wiedemann,et al.  Surgical problems and complex procedures: issues for operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Does preoperative multislice computed tomography predict operative times in total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting? , 2005, The heart surgery forum.

[17]  M. Kofler,et al.  Five hundred cases of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: predictors of success and safety. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Robotic coronary artery bypass for aberrant right coronary artery stenosis. , 2010, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[19]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of total endoscopic left internal mammary artery bypass graft to the left anterior descending artery. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  C. Kolbitsch,et al.  Robotically assisted totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair: insights from operative times, learning curves, and clinical outcome. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Training surgeons to perform robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  W. Boyd,et al.  Analysis of the learning curve in telerobotic, beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting: a 90 patient experience. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  C. Kolbitsch,et al.  Does obesity affect operative times and perioperative outcome of patients undergoing totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery? , 2009, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.