Effects of Active Sting Damping on Common Research Model Data Quality

Recent tests using the Common Research Model (CRM) at the Langley National Transonic Facility (NTF) and the Ames 11-foot Transonic Wind Tunnel (11’ TWT) produced large sets of data that have been used to examine the effects of active damping on transonic tunnel aerodynamic data quality. In particular, large statistically significant sets of repeat data demonstrate that the active damping system had no apparent effect on drag, lift and pitching moment repeatability during warm testing conditions, while simultaneously enabling aerodynamic data to be obtained post stall. A small set of cryogenic (high Reynolds number) repeat data was obtained at the NTF and again showed a negligible effect on data repeatability. However, due to a degradation of control power in the active damping system cryogenically, the ability to obtain test data post-stall was not achieved during cryogenic testing. Additionally, comparisons of data repeatability between NTF and 11-ft TWT CRM data led to further (warm) testing at the NTF which demonstrated that for a modest increase in data sampling time, a 2-3 factor improvement in drag, and pitching moment repeatability was readily achieved not related with the active damping system.

[1]  James P Billingsley,et al.  Sting Dynamics of Wind Tunnel Models , 1976 .

[2]  Vice President,et al.  Design and Performance of an Active Sting Damper for the NASA Common Research Model , 2011 .

[3]  Robert M. Bennett,et al.  Analysis of vibrations of the National Transonic Facility model support system using a 3-D aeroelastic code , 1989 .

[4]  Ralph David Buehrle,et al.  System Dynamic Analysis of a Wind Tunnel Model with Applications to Improve Aerodynamic Data Quality , 2013 .

[5]  R. A. Wahls,et al.  A longitudinal aerodynamic data repeatability study for a commercial transport model test in the National Transonic Facility , 1995 .

[6]  S. Balakrishna,et al.  Reduction of Tunnel Dynamics at the National Transonic Facility (Invited) , 2001 .

[7]  Roger Wimmel,et al.  Validation Testing with the Active Damping System in the European Transonic Windtunnel , 2001 .

[8]  Dieter Schimanski,et al.  Recent aspects of high Reynolds number data quality and capabilities at the European Transonic Windtunnel , 2000 .

[9]  Marion L. Laster.  Technical Evaluation Report on the Fluid Dynamics Panel Symposium on Aerodynamic Data Accuracy and Quality: Requirements and Capabilities in Wind Tunnel Testing , 1988 .

[10]  Clarence P. Young,et al.  National Transonic Facility model and model support vibration problems , 1990 .

[11]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[12]  Julien Weiss.  Model vibrations and inertial bias measurement in a transonic wind tunnel test , 2008 .

[13]  Richard White,et al.  Development of a Wind Tunnel Active Vibration Reduction System , 2007 .

[14]  Tom D. Finley,et al.  Improved Correction System for Vibration Sensitive Inertial Angle of Attack Measurement Devices , 2000 .

[15]  John W. Edwards.  National Transonic Facility Model and Tunnel Vibrations , 2009 .

[16]  S. Balakrishna,et al.  Analysis of NASA Common Research Model Dynamic Data , 2011 .

[17]  T. D. Finley,et al.  Results From a Sting Whip Correction Verification Test at the Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel , 2002 .