Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry

Significant yield losses in maize (Zea mays L.) from drought are expected to increase with global climate change as temperatures rise and rainfall distribution changes in key traditional production areas. The success of conventional crop improvement over the past 50 years for drought tolerance forms a baseline against which new genetic methods must be compared. Selection based on performance in multi-environment trials (MET) has increased grain yield under drought through increased yield potential and kernel set, rapid silk exertion, and reduced barrenness, though at a lower rate than under optimal conditions. Knowledge of the physiology of drought tolerance has been used to dissect the trait into a series of key processes. This has been complemented by genetic dissection through the identification of QTL associated with these same traits. Both have been used to identify suitable organ- and temporal-specific promoters and structural genes. Phenotyping capacity has not kept pace with the exponential increase in genotypic knowledge, and large-scale managed stress environments (MSE) are now considered essential to further progress. These environments provide ideal settings for conducting massively parallel transcript profiling studies, and for validating candidate regions and genes. Genetic and crop physiological models of key processes are now being used to confirm the value of traits for target environments, and to suggest efficient breeding strategies. Studies of gene to phenotype relationships suggest that most putative drought tolerance QTL identified thus far are likely to have limited utility for applied breeding because of their dependency on genetic background or their sensitivity to the environment, coupled with a general lack of understanding of the biophysical bases of these context dependencies. Furthermore, the sample of weather conditions encountered during progeny selection within the multi environment testing of conventional breeding programs can profoundly affect allele frequency in breeding populations and the stress tolerance of elite commercial products. We conclude that while gains in kernels per plant can be made by exploiting native genetic variation among elite breeding lines, improvements in functional stay-green or in root distribution and function may require additional genetic variation from outside the species. Genomic tools and the use of model plants are considered indispensable tools in this search for new ways of optimizing maize yield under stress. # 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. A. Millen,et al.  Site-specific analysis of a droughted corn crop: II. Water use and stress. , 2000 .

[2]  M. Kang,et al.  Why quantitative geneticists should care about bioinformatics. , 2001 .

[3]  K. Cassman Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize , 2002 .

[5]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Desertification in Relation to Climate Variability and Change , 2002 .

[6]  T. Mackay,et al.  The genetic architecture of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila: epistasis and the transcriptome , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Piero Carninci,et al.  Monitoring the Expression Pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis Genes under Drought and Cold Stresses by Using a Full-Length cDNA Microarray , 2001, Plant Cell.

[8]  L. R. Veldboom,et al.  Genetic Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci in Maize in Stress and Nonstress Environments: I. Grain Yield and Yield Components , 1996 .

[9]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines , 1996, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[10]  M. Smith,et al.  Improvement of hybrid yield by advanced backcross QTL analysis in elite maize , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  E. Casas Identification of quantitative trait loci in beef cattle , 2005 .

[12]  D. Hoisington,et al.  Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize. 1. Flowering parameters and the anthesis-silking interval , 1996, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[13]  Kent Vander Velden,et al.  The selective values of alleles in a molecular network model are context dependent. , 2004, Genetics.

[14]  F. Andrade,et al.  Kernel Number Prediction in Maize under Nitrogen or Water Stress , 2002 .

[15]  T. Setter,et al.  Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Placenta and Endosperm in Developing Maize Kernels in Response to Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[16]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[17]  C. Schön,et al.  Bias and Sampling Error of the Estimated Proportion of Genotypic Variance Explained by Quantitative Trait Loci Determined From Experimental Data in Maize Using Cross Validation and Validation With Independent Samples. , 2000, Genetics.

[18]  D. Hoisington,et al.  Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize. 2. Yield components and marker-assisted selection strategies , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[19]  D. Duvick The Contribution of Breeding to Yield Advances in maize (Zea mays L.) , 2005 .

[20]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[21]  P. Arús,et al.  Marker-assisted selection , 1993 .

[22]  F. Eeuwijk,et al.  Analysing QTL by environment interaction by factorial regression, with an application to the CIMMYT drought and low nitrogen stress programme in maize , 2002 .

[23]  G. Hammer,et al.  Using crop simulation to generate genotype by environment interaction effects for sorghum in water-limited environments , 2002 .

[24]  Jean-Marcel Ribaut,et al.  The Role and Regulation of the Anthesis‐Silking Interval in Maize , 2000 .

[25]  T. Helentjaris,et al.  The use of gene expression profiling to dissect the stress sensitivity of reproductive development in maize , 2002 .

[26]  S. Briggs,et al.  Plant genomics: more than food for thought. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Future contributions of crop modelling—from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement , 2002 .

[28]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Exploring variety - environment data using random effects AMMI models with adjustments for spatial field trend: Part 2. Applications , 2001 .

[29]  Hur-Song Chang,et al.  Expression Profile Matrix of Arabidopsis Transcription Factor Genes Suggests Their Putative Functions in Response to Environmental Stresses , 2002, The Plant Cell Online.

[30]  D. Galbraith,et al.  A genomics approach towards salt stress tolerance , 2001 .

[31]  G. Edmeades,et al.  The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize , 1996 .

[32]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding , 2001 .

[33]  H. Fu,et al.  Intraspecific violation of genetic colinearity and its implications in maize , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[35]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. , 2002, Journal of experimental botany.

[36]  A. Forrest Troyer,et al.  Breeding widely adapted, popular maize hybrids , 2004, Euphytica.

[37]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Use of molecular markers in plant breeding: drought tolerance improvement in tropical maize. , 2001 .

[38]  E. Winzeler,et al.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays , 2000, Nature.

[39]  P. Miklas,et al.  Marker-Assisted Selection , 2005 .

[40]  P. Krajewski,et al.  Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by molecular markers I. Yield components , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[41]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity as a Crop Productivity Measure for Claypan Soils , 1999 .

[42]  V. Sadras,et al.  Seed number as a function of growth. A comparative study in soybean, sunflower, and maize , 2001 .

[43]  S. Salvi,et al.  Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives in drought-stressed maize. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[44]  T. B. Daynard,et al.  RESISTANCE TO DROUGHT AND DENSITY STRESS IN CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN MAIZE (Zea mays L.) HYBRIDS , 1984 .

[45]  M. Causse,et al.  Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. , 2002, Genetics.

[46]  Philip J. Bauer,et al.  Site‐Specific Analysis of a Droughted Corn Crop: I. Growth and Grain Yield , 2000 .

[47]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Effects of genetic background on response to selection in experimental populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2003, Genetics.

[48]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Developing drought- and low N-tolerant maize , 1997 .

[49]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  A new class of resolvable incomplete block designs , 1976 .

[50]  Marianne Bänziger,et al.  Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels , 1999 .

[51]  M. Cooper,et al.  Complex Trait Genetics and Gene-to-Phenotype Models , 2004 .

[52]  D. Duvick,et al.  Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States , 1999 .

[53]  D. Duvick What is yield , 1997 .