Prediction of nonlinear soil effects

Mathematical models of soil nonlinearity in common use and recently developed nonlinear codes are compared to investigate the range of their predictions. We consider equivalent linear formulations with and without frequency-dependent moduli and damping ratios and nonlinear formulations for total and effective stress. Average velocity profiles to 150 m depth with midrange National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program site classifications (B, BC, C, D, and E) in the top 30 m are used to compare the response of a wide range of site conditions from rock to soft soil. Nonlinear soil models are compared using the amplification spectrum, calculated as the ratio of surface ground motion to the input motion at the base of the velocity profile. Peak input motions from 0.1 g to 0.9 g are considered. For site class B, no significant differences exist between the models considered in this article. For site classes BC and C, differences are small at low input motions (0.1 g to 0.2 g ), but become significant at higher input levels. For site classes D and E the overdamping of frequencies above about 4 Hz by the equivalent linear solution with frequency-independent parameters is apparent for the entire range of input motions considered. The equivalent linear formulation with frequency-dependent moduli and damping ratios under damps relative to the nonlinear models considered for site class C with larger input motions and most input levels for site classes D and E. At larger input motions the underdamping for site classes D and E is not as severe as the overdamping with the frequency-independent formulation, but there are still significant differences in the time domain. A nonlinear formulation is recommended for site classes D and E and for site classes BC and C with input motions greater than a few tenths of the acceleration of gravity. The type of nonlinear formulation to use is driven by considerations of the importance of water content and the availability of laboratory soils data. Our average amplification curves from a nonlinear effective stress formulation compare favorably with observed spectral amplification at class D and E sites in the Seattle area for the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. Manuscript received 18 June 2004.

[1]  S. Kramer.  Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[2]  Daniel Lavallée,et al.  Nonlinear site response; laboratory modeling as a constraint for modeling accelerograms , 1998 .

[3]  Y. Fukushima,et al.  Characteristics of Observed Peak Amplitude for Strong Ground Motion from the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake , 2000 .

[4]  Raj V. Siddharthan,et al.  On the characteristics of nonlinear soil response , 1993 .

[5]  David M. Boore,et al.  Seismic velocities and geological conditions at twelve sites subjected to strong ground motion in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake; a revision of OFR 96-740 , 1999 .

[6]  Masata Sugito,et al.  FREQUENCY DEPENDENT EQUI-LINEARIZED TECHNIQUE FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF MULTI-LAYERED GROUND , 1994 .

[7]  Wilfred D. Iwan,et al.  On a Class of Models for the Yielding Behavior of Continuous and Composite Systems , 1967 .

[8]  Susumu Iai,et al.  Strain Space Plasticity Model for Cyclic Mobility , 1992 .

[9]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Nonlinear Soil Response— 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake , 1996 .

[10]  G. R. Martin,et al.  COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC ANALYSES FOR SATURATED SANDS , 1978 .

[11]  Mladen Vucetic,et al.  Normalized behavior of clay under irregular cyclic loading , 1990 .

[12]  A. Frankel,et al.  Correlation of 1- to 10-Hz Earthquake Resonances with Surface Measurements of S-wave Reflections and Refractions in the Upper 50 m , 2000 .

[13]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis , 2002 .

[14]  D. Perkins,et al.  National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996 , 1996 .

[15]  C. B. Crouse,et al.  Site Response Studies for Purpose of Revising NEHRP Seismic Provisions , 1996 .

[16]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Nonlinearity, liquefaction, and velocity variation of soft soil layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  Paul A. Johnson,et al.  Nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge earthquake: Observations and finite source simulations , 1998 .

[18]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  FUNDAMENTALS OF ROCK MECHANICS. THIRD EDITION , 1979 .

[19]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[20]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  Simulation of Broadband Ground Motion Including Nonlinear Soil Effects for a Magnitude 6.5 Earthquake on the Seattle Fault, Seattle, Washington , 2001 .

[21]  P. B. Schnabel.  SHAKE-A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites , 1970 .

[22]  K. Ishihara,et al.  Soil Behaviour In Earthquake Geotechnics , 1996 .

[23]  Toshimi Satoh,et al.  Nonlinear behavior of soil sediments identified by using borehole records observed at the Ashigra Valley, Japan , 1995 .

[24]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[25]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[26]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes , 1975 .

[27]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  Seismic simulation of inelastic soils via frequency-dependent moduli and damping , 2002 .

[28]  R. Pyke,et al.  NONLINEAR SOIL MODELS FOR IRREGULAR CYCLIC LOADINGS , 1979 .

[29]  G. Masing,et al.  Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing , 1926 .

[30]  David Carver,et al.  Nonlinear and Linear Site Response and Basin Effects in Seattle for the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake , 2002 .

[31]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  The Amplitude Dependence of High-Frequency Spectral Decay: Constraint on Soil Non-Linearity , 1996 .

[32]  R. Dobry,et al.  Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response , 1991 .

[33]  Stephen H. Hartzell,et al.  Variability in nonlinear sediment response during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[34]  E. Field,et al.  Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1997, Nature.

[35]  Raj V. Siddharthan,et al.  Expected Signature of Nonlinearity on Regression for Strong Ground-Motion Parameters , 2000 .

[36]  F. E. Richart,et al.  Soil motion computations by characteristics method : 12F, 16R. J. GEOTECH. ENGNG. DIV. V100, N. GT3, MAR. 1974, P247–263 , 1974 .

[37]  F. E. Richart,et al.  Soil Motion Computations by Characteristics Method , 1974 .

[38]  Yuehua Zeng,et al.  Study of weak and strong ground motion including nonlinearity from the Northridge, California, earthquake sequence , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[39]  J. C. Jaeger,et al.  Fundamentals of rock mechanics , 1969 .

[40]  E. Field,et al.  Magnitude of nonlinear sediment response in Los Angeles basin during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[41]  A. Frankel,et al.  Surface Seismic Measurements of Near-Surface P- and S-Wave Seismic Velocities at Earthquake Recording Stations, Seattle, Washington , 1999 .

[42]  Raj V. Siddharthan,et al.  Characteristics of nonlinear response of deep saturated soil deposits , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[43]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Efficient simulation of constant Q using coarse-grained memory variables , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[44]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Nonlinear soil response as a natural passive isolation mechanism—the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake , 1998 .

[45]  Fred H. Kulhawy,et al.  Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design , 1990 .

[46]  I. Towhata,et al.  Modelling soil behavior under principal stress axes rotation , 1985 .

[47]  Susumu Iai,et al.  NONLINEAR SITE RESPONSE AND ITS EVALUATION AND PREDICTION , 1998 .

[48]  V. Drnevich,et al.  SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING IN SOILS: DESIGN EQUATIONS AND CURVES , 1972 .