Patterns of nest placement in a population of Marsh Tits Poecile palustris

AbstractThe factors influencing nest placement by territorial birds are not fully understood, including the roles played by habitat, conspecific attraction and female experience of a previous nesting location. We used 7 years of Marsh Tit (Poecile palustris) nest-site and territory data, and high-resolution vegetation models derived from remote sensing, to investigate spatial patterns of nest placement with regard to previous female experience and age, conspecific attraction, and habitat in a woodland environment. We found no evidence for an effect of conspecific attraction or previous nest location on nest placement within the territory. However, first-year (FY) females placed nests in a random spatial pattern within their territories, and after first-year (AFY) females predominantly placed nests within the central parts of their territories, away from conspecifics. The core area of each breeding territory was centred on a region of comparatively taller overstorey and less understorey than other parts of the territory. Nest-sites were situated in localised areas of a similar structure, although absolute differences between selected and non-selected areas of the territory were not substantial. Both female age groups nested in areas of the territory where the overstorey contained relatively more Common Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and Field Maple (Acer campestre), which may have been related to tree height, but there was no selection for English Oak (Quercus robur). We found no significant habitat differences between the territories of FY and AFY females that explained their differing patterns of nest placement.ZusammenfassungNistplatzwahl in einer Population von SumpfmeisenPoecile palustris Die Faktoren, die die Nistplatzwahl territorialer Vogelarten beeinflussen, sind nicht gänzlich verstanden. Dies beinhaltet die Funktion des Habitats, innerartliche Attraktion, aber auch die Erfahrung der Weibchen mit früheren Neststandorten. Mit Hilfe eines Datensatzes aus sieben Jahren zu Nistplätzen und Revieren von Sumpfmeisen (Poecile palustris) sowie hoch aufgelösten Vegetationsmodellen (aus Fernerkundungsdaten hergeleitet) untersuchten wir räumliche Muster der Nistplatzwahl im Hinblick auf Alter und Erfahrung der Weibchen, innerartliche Attraktion und Habitat in einem Waldgebiet. Wir fanden keine Beweise für einen Effekt der innerartlichen Attraktion oder früherer Neststandorte auf die Nistplatzwahl innerhalb der Reviere. Allerdings legten vorjährige Weibchen, räumlich gesehen, ihre Nester innerhalb ihrer Reviere in einem zufälligen Muster an. Ältere Weibchen legten dagegen ihre Nester überwiegend in den zentralen Bereichen ihrer Reviere an, abseits von Artgenossen. Das Kerngebiet der einzelnen Brutreviere lag in Bereichen mit vergleichsweise höherem Oberholz und weniger Unterholz als in anderen Bereichen der Reviere. Die Neststandorte befanden sich in Bereichen mit ähnlicher Struktur, obwohl grundsätzliche Unterschiede zwischen gewählten und nicht gewählten Bereichen innerhalb der Reviere nicht substantiell waren. Beide Altersgruppen der Weibchen nisteten in Bereichen der Brutreviere, in denen die höherwüchsige Struktur relativ mehr aus Gewöhnlicher Esche (Fraxinus excelsior) und Feldahorn (Acer campestre) bestand, was mit der Baumhöhe zusammenhängen könnte. Allerdings gab es keine Selektion für Stieleichen (Quercus robur). Wir fanden keine signifikanten Habitatunterschiede zwischen den Revieren der beiden Altersgruppen der Weibchen, die die Verteilung der Neststandorte erklären.

[1]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments , 2005 .

[2]  J. Marzluff.  Do pinyon jays alter nest placement based on prior experience? , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  S. M. Ramsay,et al.  Variation in social rank acquisition influences lifetime reproductive success in black-capped chickadees , 2007 .

[4]  K. Koivula,et al.  Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus) , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  S. M. Ramsay,et al.  Patterns of extrapair mating in relation to male dominance status and female nest placement in black-capped chickadees , 2004 .

[6]  S. M. Ramsay,et al.  NEST-SITE SELECTION BY FEMALE BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES: SETTLEMENT BASED ON CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION? , 1999 .

[7]  Peter Rothery,et al.  Habitat selection by Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in the UK , 2007 .

[8]  Richard T. Holmes,et al.  Understanding population change in migratory songbirds: long-term and experimental studies of Neotropical migrants in breeding and wintering areas , 2007 .

[9]  Ben C. Sheldon,et al.  Habitat quality, nestling diet, and provisioning behaviour in great tits Parus major , 2009 .

[10]  S. Goetz,et al.  Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a Neotropical migrant bird. , 2010, Ecology.

[11]  Joanna Burger,et al.  Physical and social determinants of nest-site selection in piping plover in New Jersey , 1987 .

[12]  E. Belda,et al.  Nesting Habitat Requirements and Nestling Diet in the Mediterranean Populations of Crested Tits Lophophanes cristatus , 2009 .

[13]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Effects of dispersal date on winter flock establishment and social dominance in marsh tits Parus palustris , 1988 .

[14]  M. Ehlers,et al.  Review article: Thirty years of analysing and modelling avian habitat relationships using satellite imagery data: a review , 2005 .

[15]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Dispersal, ranging and settling behaviour of Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in a fragmented landscape in lowland England , 2010 .

[16]  A. Hudak,et al.  Mapping snags and understory shrubs for a LiDAR-based assessment of wildlife habitat suitability , 2009 .

[17]  T. E. Martin.  Nest Predation Among Vegetation Layers and Habitat Types: Revising the Dogmas , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Habitat selection by the pale-headed brush-finch (Atlapetes pallidiceps) in southern Ecuador: implications for conservation , 2004 .

[19]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes Aedon) , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Ross A. Hill,et al.  Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LiDAR data , 2005 .

[21]  S. Hinsley,et al.  Ageing and sexing Marsh Tits Poecile palustris using wing length and moult , 2008 .

[22]  S. Nilsson.  The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition , 1984 .

[23]  R. Hill,et al.  Marsh Tit Poecile palustris territories in a British broad-leaved wood , 2006 .

[24]  F. Knopf,et al.  Habitat relationships and nest site characteristics of cavity-nesting birds in cottonwood floodplains. , 1990 .

[25]  SUSAN M. S•TH,et al.  ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES IN BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES , 2003 .

[26]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Bird Census Techniques , 1992 .

[27]  T. Wesol̸owski.  Nest-site re-use: Marsh Tit Poecile palustris decisions in a primeval forest , 2006 .

[28]  Richard K. Broughton,et al.  Mapping the understorey of deciduous woodland from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data: A case study in lowland Britain , 2009 .

[29]  L. Underhill,et al.  Nesting habitat selection by crested tits Parus cristatus in a pine plantation. , 1993 .

[30]  R. Hill,et al.  Nest-sites, breeding failure, and causes of non-breeding in a population of British Marsh Tits Poecile palustris , 2011 .

[31]  Robin Fuller,et al.  Indices of bird-habitat preference from field surveys of birds and remote sensing of land cover: a study of south-eastern England with wider implications for conservation and biodiversity assessment , 2005 .

[32]  K. W. Sockman.  SEASONAL VARIATION IN NEST PLACEMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER , 2000 .

[33]  S. Hinsley,et al.  National‐scale analyses of habitat associations of Marsh Tits Poecile palustris and Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus: two species with opposing population trends in Britain , 2010 .

[34]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[35]  D. Westneat,et al.  Tests of spatial and temporal factors influencing extra‐pair paternity in red‐winged blackbirds , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[36]  R. Hill,et al.  Mapping tree species in temperate deciduous woodland using time‐series multi‐spectral data , 2010 .

[37]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  The cost of extra-pair fertilizations to female red-winged blackbirds , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between organisms and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data , 2005 .

[39]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  TERRITORY AND NEST-SITE SELECTION OF CERULEAN WARBLERS IN EASTERN ONTARIO , 2001 .

[40]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[41]  T. Wesol̸owski.  Time-saving mechanisms in the reproduction of Marsh Tits (Parus palustris) , 2000, Journal für Ornithologie.

[42]  N. Rodenhouse,et al.  Provision of nestboxes raises the breeding density of Great Tits Parus major equally in coniferous and deciduous woodland , 2009 .

[43]  J. Millspaugh,et al.  Multi-scale nest-site selection by black-backed woodpeckers in outbreaks of mountain pine beetles , 2009 .

[44]  Ken W. Smith,et al.  Stand management: a threat or opportunity for birds in British woodland?: Stand management and birds in British woodland , 2007 .

[45]  David A. Elston,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE AMONG A RANGE OF OPTIONS USING LOG RATIO ANALYSIS , 1996 .

[46]  M. J. Stenning.  Hatching Asynchrony and Brood Reduction in Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus May be a Plastic Response to Local Oak Quercus robur Bud Burst and Caterpillar Emergence , 2008 .

[47]  Chris S. Elphick,et al.  Using Spatial Point-Pattern Assessment to Understand the Social and Environmental Mechanisms That Drive Avian Habitat Selection , 2010 .

[48]  S. J. Melles,et al.  Disentangling habitat and social drivers of nesting patterns in songbirds , 2009, Landscape Ecology.