The Impact of Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Collaborative Learning Groups in Multicultural Classes on the Achievement and Attitudes of Nine Graders towards Learning Science.

The current study aims at investigating the impact of homogeneous versus heterogeneous collaborative learning grouping in multicultural classes on the students’ achievements and attitudes towards learning science. In the present study, heterogeneity was unpacked through two dimensions: the cultural background, represented by the different nationalities present in the class and the students’ different abilities. The interaction between these two factors and their combined effect on the achievement and attitudes were also investigated. The study also considered an approach to provide quality teaching for a diverse group of students by neutralizing the heterogeneity factor or reducing its negative effect. For this purpose, 100 nine graders from more than 10 countries in an independent preparatory school in Doha / Qatar were divided into four classes and distributed over the following learning “STAD” groups: aHeterogeneous by ability but homogeneous by nationality. bHeterogeneous by nationality but homogeneous by ability. cEntirely heterogeneous (i.e. by both the ability and the nationality). dEntirely homogeneous (i.e. by both the ability and the nationality). A diagnostic placement test, standardized pretest and posttest in addition to the regular school tests were used to measure the achievement of the students. A Questionnaire was developed to measure the attitudes of the students towards learning science as well as towards group working. The study concluded that the main effects of group structure on the students’ attitudes towards learning science were demonstrated by the heterogeneous group. It affected all the attitude components except the “working with students from different cultural backgrounds” dimension, where nearly all group types had the same effect. However, this positive attitude was enhanced when the effect of mixed ability classes was combined with the effect of multiculturalism. Having foreign students or students from different cultures in a mixed ability class, yielded the best desired results. Therefore, the researcher highly recommends maximizing the heterogeneity in a class in all possible ways. The implemented collaborative learning strategy made learning more fun and beneficial for the students, enhanced their self confidence, academic awareness, and consequently their overall attitude towards science.

[1]  Shlomo Sharan,et al.  Group Investigation Expands Cooperative Learning , 1990 .

[2]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement , 1996 .

[3]  James Cooper,et al.  Cooperative Learning and College Instruction: Effective Use of Student Learning Teams. , 1990 .

[4]  J. Banks,et al.  Multicultural Education, Transformative Knowledge and Action: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Multicultural Education Series. , 1997 .

[5]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[6]  R. Slavin,et al.  Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT): Review of Ten Classroom Experiments. , 1978 .

[7]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention , 1992, Proceedings. Twenty-Second Annual conference Frontiers in Education.

[8]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[9]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[10]  A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms , 1995 .

[11]  A. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[12]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[13]  J. Coleman,et al.  Equality And Achievement In Education , 1993 .

[14]  S. Beebe,et al.  Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices , 1982 .

[15]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning and the Cooperative School. , 1987 .

[16]  Assessing Our Commitment to Multiculturalism: Student Perspectives , 2007 .

[17]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1986 .

[18]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Re-engineering female friendly science , 1997 .

[19]  J. Mullan,et al.  Strategies to Improve Student Reaction to Group Work , 2007, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[20]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[21]  J. J. Irvine,et al.  Diversity within Unity: Essential Principles for Teaching and Learning in a Multicultural Society , 2001 .

[22]  Wilma Lund,et al.  National Council for the Social Studies , 1922 .

[23]  A. Gamoran,et al.  The Effects of Stratification in Secondary Schools: Synthesis of Survey and Ethnographic Research , 1987 .

[24]  J. Banks.  Multiethnic education: Theory and practice , 1981 .

[25]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Controlling for Individual Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Models, with Applications to Student Achievement , 2007, 0706.1401.

[26]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes , 1995 .

[27]  Spyros Konstantopoulos,et al.  Trends of School Effects on Student Achievement: Evidence from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92 , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Vincent Dupriez,et al.  How Do School Systems Manage Pupils’ Heterogeneity? , 2008, Comparative Education Review.

[29]  James E. Rosenbaum.  Social implications of educational grouping , 1980 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Effects of Group Composition on Gifted and Non-Gifted Elementary Students in Cooperative Learning Groups. , 1995 .

[31]  C. Shields.  To Group or Not to Group Academically Talented or Gifted Students? , 1996 .

[32]  Liora Linchevski,et al.  Tell me with whom you're learning, and I'll tell you how much you've learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics , 1998 .

[33]  How Strongly Are Attitude and Achievement Related , 1982 .

[34]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance , 1989 .

[35]  Richard M. Felder.  Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes. A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. Report No. NCSU-94A. , 1994 .

[36]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[37]  Bernice R. Sandler,et al.  The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide to Improve the Education of Women. , 1996 .