A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals

[1]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  R. Urquhart,et al.  Are leading medical journals following their own policies on CONSORT reporting? , 2008, Contemporary Clinical Trials.

[3]  Robert L Kane,et al.  Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Claire Snowdon,et al.  Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don't understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons' experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT , 2007, Trials.

[5]  T. Whelan,et al.  The importance of reporting patient recruitment details in phase III trials. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  S. Johnston,et al.  Recruiting Subjects for Acute Stroke Trials: A Meta-Analysis , 2006, Stroke.

[7]  Joel Gagnier,et al.  The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement. , 2005, Contemporary clinical trials.

[8]  A. Oxman,et al.  Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  L. Stewart,et al.  Trends in UK cancer trials: results from the UK Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research National Register of Cancer Trials , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  C. Gross,et al.  Reporting the Recruitment Process in Clinical Trials: Who Are These Patients and How Did They Get There? , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  M Egger,et al.  Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Neil Pendleton,et al.  Interpreting the evidence: choosing between randomised and non›randomised studies , 1999 .

[17]  M. Clarke,et al.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.

[18]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[19]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Fate of Research Studies , 1992, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[20]  J. Cuzick.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  D. Altman.  Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample? , 1980, British medical journal.