SSVEP-based BCI for a DMD Patient – A Case Study

The present paper presents the adaptation made to yield a working 5-class steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) based brain-computer interface (BCI) system for a Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patient. The patient was unable to use the "standard" BCI system which made use of a liquid crystal display (LCD) of a laptop screen as the visual stimulator. A detailed assessment of the patient’s electroencephalography (EEG) spectrogram suggested that he had an inherently active alpha rhythm that manifested itself regularly even when he was focusing on other stimulation frequencies. Besides, he also exhibited an extraordinarily noisy EEG spectrum which was probably caused by his uncontrollable jerking movements. To improve his BCI performance, we substituted the LCD stimulator with LEDs programmed to flicker at different frequencies and mounted on the two sides of the laptop using a custom aluminium frame. We also conducted another pre-test to identify five stimulation frequencies that the patient could use to evoke useful SSVEP responses. While there is still room for improvement, such adaptations had rendered him an acceptable level of BCI control with >60% classification accuracy. The present study can serve as a reference for researchers or clinicians that encounter similar problem especially in a clinical setting where patients showed undesirable performance dynamics.

[1]  Usman Rashid,et al.  An EEG Experimental Study Evaluating the Performance of Texas Instruments ADS1299 , 2018, Sensors.

[2]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[3]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  R. Ortner,et al.  Accuracy of a P300 Speller for People with Motor Impairments: A Comparison , 2011 .

[5]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Pablo F. Diez,et al.  Asynchronous BCI control using high-frequency SSVEP , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  John Williamson,et al.  User-centered design in brain-computer interfaces - A case study , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[8]  Robert L. Mercer,et al.  Class-Based n-gram Models of Natural Language , 1992, CL.

[9]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  F. Piccione,et al.  P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Poor performance in SSVEP BCIs: Are worse subjects just slower? , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Could Anyone Use a BCI? , 2010, Brain-Computer Interfaces.

[13]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Li Zhang,et al.  A method for recognizing high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential based on empirical modal decomposition and canonical correlation analysis , 2019, 2019 IEEE 3rd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC).