Spatiotemporal singular transformation in dynamical systems with impacts and its use in obtaining generalized solution of painleve problem

This work considers classical problem of motion in systems with dry friction, known as the Painleve problem. This problem takes place in the presence of collisions of a rod with a flat surface, and the use of the classical mechanics method runs into difficulties due to the impulsive nature of the interaction force that does not lend itself to exact calculations. The methodology suggested by the authors in recent years permits approximating a family of solutions corresponding to a large value of the stiffness coefficient of the obstacle.

[1]  J. Moreau,et al.  Unilateral Contact and Dry Friction in Finite Freedom Dynamics , 1988 .

[2]  N. McClamroch,et al.  A singular perturbation approach to modeling and control of manipulators constrained by a stiff environment , 1989, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,.

[3]  Laetitia Paoli,et al.  Mouvement à un nombre fini de degrés de liberté avec contraintes unilatérales: cas avec perte d'énergie , 1993 .

[4]  Yu.I. Neimark,et al.  The Painlevé paradoxes and the dynamics of a brake shoe , 1995 .

[5]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Ultrasonic Processes and Machines: Dynamics, Control and Applications , 1995 .

[6]  B. Brogliato.  Nonsmooth Impact Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control , 1996 .

[7]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  A Critical Study of the Applicability of Rigid-Body Collision Theory , 1996 .

[8]  Kenji Uchino,et al.  Piezoelectric Actuators and Ultrasonic Motors , 1996 .

[9]  S. T. Zavalishchin,et al.  Dynamic Impulse Systems: Theory and Applications , 1997 .

[10]  D. Stewart.  Convergence of a Time‐Stepping Scheme for Rigid‐Body Dynamics and Resolution of Painlevé's Problem , 1998 .

[11]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  An Energy-Based Coefficient of Restitution for Planar Impacts of Slender Bars With Massive External Surfaces , 1998 .

[12]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Control of Dynamic Systems with Unilateral Constraints and Differential Equations with Measures , 1998 .

[13]  B. Brogliato,et al.  New results on Painlevé paradoxes , 1999 .

[14]  Laetitia Paoli,et al.  Penalty Approximation for Non-smooth Constraints in Vibroimpact , 2000 .

[15]  David E. Stewart,et al.  Rigid-Body Dynamics with Friction and Impact , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Panagiotis D. Panagiotopoulos,et al.  Inequality constraints with elastic impacts in deformable bodies. The convex case , 2000 .

[17]  B. Brogliato,et al.  Dissipative Systems Analysis and Control , 2000 .

[18]  Michelle Schatzman.  Penalty method for impact in generalized coordinates , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Mechanical systems with unilateral constraints: controlled singularity approach , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[20]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Dynamical systems with controllable singularities: multi-scale and limit representations and optimal control , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[21]  S. Grigoryan.  The solution to the Painleve paradox for dry friction , 2001 .

[22]  Bernard Brogliato,et al.  Some perspectives on the analysis and control of complementarity systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[23]  J. Bentsman,et al.  Dynamical systems with controlled singularities: physically based representation and control-oriented modeling , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[24]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  The Singularity Opening Approach to Control of Mechanical Systems with Constraints , 2003 .

[25]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Impulsive Control in Continuous and Discrete-Continuous Systems , 2003 .

[26]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Modeling and simulation methodology for impact microactuators , 2004 .

[27]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  MODELING AND CONTROL OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS WITH ACTIVE SINGULARITIES AND SENSING IN A SINGULAR MOTION PHASE , 2005 .

[28]  V. Samsonov.  The dynamics of a brake shoe and “impact generated by friction”† , 2005 .

[29]  Christoph Glocker,et al.  Oblique Frictional Impact of a Bar: Analysis and Comparison of Different Impact Laws , 2005 .

[30]  Michelle Schatzman.  Penalty Approximation of Painlevé Problem , 2006 .

[31]  Laetitia Paoli,et al.  Numerical simulation of the dynamics of an impacting bar , 2007 .

[32]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Dynamical Systems With Active Singularities of Elastic Type: A Modeling and Controller Synthesis Framework , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[33]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Generalized solutions in systems with active unilateral constraints , 2007 .

[34]  C. Chevallereau,et al.  Virtual quadruped: Mechanical design, control, simulation, and experimentation , 2007 .

[35]  N. Wouw,et al.  Stability and Convergence of Mechanical Systems with Unilateral Constraints , 2008 .

[36]  Boris M. Miller,et al.  Dynamical systems with active singularities: Input/state/output modeling and control , 2008, Autom..

[37]  Sudip K. Mazumder,et al.  Optimal control of dynamical systems with active singularities under single- and multi-impact sequences: A ball/racket system example , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.