Information networks among species : adaptations and counter-adaptations in acquiring and hiding information

Social information use is a widespread phenomenon across the animal kingdom and it affects various important aspects of animal behaviour. Animals observe and copy the behaviour of conspecifics and other species on the same trophic level in their own decision-making, e.g., in habitat or mate choice. Copying is adaptive only when it is selective. Thus, it would be important to understand when and which individuals should copy others, and which individuals they choose to copy and what are the consequences of social information use. In this thesis, I experimentally study these questions in wild animals living in natural conditions. By simulating arbitrary preference of great tits (Parus major), I demonstrated that the portrayed fitness does not affect the nest site choices of conspecifics, but the tit pairs with an old male prefer the nest site choices of good and poor conspecifics. Social information use among tits appears to be ageand sex-dependent. Pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), however, selectively copy or reject a novel nest site feature preference (symbol attached to the nest box) of great tits experimentally manipulated to exhibit high or low fitness (clutch size), respectively. By offering pied flycatchers choice in nest boxes with alternative contents, I showed that nest take-overs of flycatchers are not a form of social information use, but seem to result from the reduced building effort required. Furthermore, by conducting a decoy and playback experiment, I showed that great tits covered eggs more efficiently in the presence of pied flycatchers. One function of egg covering behaviour seems to be a counter-adaptation to reduce information parasitism by pied flycatchers. My results demonstrate that the social transmission of behaviours across species can be highly selective in response to observed fitness, plausibly making the phenomenon adaptive. In contrast with the current theory of species coexistence, overlap between realized niches of species could dynamically increase or decrease, depending on the observed success of surrounding individuals. The social information revealed by success and behaviour of animals is a resource that can be used or concealed. It is a new kind of evolutionary and ecological factor which may affect the formation of ecosystems and species coevolution.

[1]  Toni Laaksonen,et al.  Climate change can alter competitive relationships between resident and migratory birds. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  S. Dale,et al.  Disappearance of Female Pied Flycatchers in Relation to Breeding Stage and Experimentally Induced Molt , 1995 .

[3]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  The type and timing of social information alters offspring production , 2008, Biology Letters.

[4]  Matteo Mameli,et al.  Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance , 2004, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[5]  Ulla Kemi Adaptation to growing season length in the perennial Arabidopsis lyrata , 2013 .

[6]  B. Galef Approaches to the study of traditional behaviors of free-living animals , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[7]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Exploring the costs and benefits of social information use: an appraisal of current experimental evidence , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  K. Laland,et al.  Social Learning in Animals: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models , 2005 .

[9]  L. Gustafsson Interspecific Competition Lowers Fitness in Collared Flycatchers Ficedula Albicollis: An Experimental Demonstration , 1987 .

[10]  Florian Matusek Selective privacy protection for video surveillance , 2014 .

[11]  Audrey Hernoux-Villière Catalytic depolymerisation of starch-based industrial waste : use of non-conventional activation methods and novel reaction media , 2013 .

[12]  Olli J. Loukola,et al.  Active hiding of social information from information-parasites , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[13]  Tuomas Lehto The importance of persuasive systems design in enhancing consumers’ perceptions and adoption of health behavior change support systems , 2013 .

[14]  J. Clobert,et al.  The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non‐colonial, hole‐nesting species, the collared flycatcher , 1999 .

[15]  J. Elmberg,et al.  Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment , 1997, Oecologia.

[16]  E. Danchin,et al.  Inclusive heritability: combining genetic and non-genetic information to study animal behavior and culture , 2010 .

[17]  A. Kopatz Genetic structure of the brown bears ( Ursus arctos ) in Northern Europe , 2014 .

[18]  Alejandro Cantarero,et al.  Behavioural responses to ectoparasites in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca: An experimental study , 2013 .

[19]  T. E. Martin Fitness costs of resource overlap among coexisting bird species , 1996, Nature.

[20]  N. Verbeek,et al.  Are avian ectoparasites more numerous in nest boxes with old nest material , 1996 .

[21]  B. Doligez,et al.  Prospecting in the collared flycatcher: gathering public information for future breeding habitat selection? , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  E. Danchin,et al.  The Double Pedigree: A Method for Studying Culturally and Genetically Inherited Behavior in Tandem , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  J. Forsman,et al.  Evidence of information collection from heterospecifics in cavity‐nesting birds , 2007 .

[24]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  L. Chittka,et al.  Social transmission of nectar-robbing behaviour in bumble-bees , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest , 1998, Oecologia.

[27]  M. Isomursu Host–parasite interactions of boreal forest grouse and their intestinal helminth parasites , 2014 .

[28]  E. Danchin Avatars of information: towards an inclusive evolutionary synthesis. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  J. Wattel Handbook of Birds of the world. , 1993 .

[30]  J. Clobert,et al.  Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher , 2004 .

[31]  Olli J. Loukola,et al.  Observed Fitness May Affect Niche Overlap in Competing Species via Selective Social Information Use , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Carl Lawrence Innovating with information technology in a globalized world : being proactive about culture , 2013 .

[33]  S. Merino,et al.  Pied flycatchers prefer to nest in clean nest boxes in an area with detrimental nest ectoparasites , 1995 .

[34]  Pilar Rodríguez,et al.  Combining lean thinking and agile software development : how do software-intensive companies use them in practice? , 2013 .

[35]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[36]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  E. Danchin,et al.  Conspecifics as informers and competitors: an experimental study in foraging bumble-bees , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  K. Laland,et al.  Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy , 1998 .

[39]  Olli J. Loukola,et al.  Intraspecific social information use in the selection of nest site characteristics , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  New behavioural trait adopted or rejected by observing heterospecific tutor fitness , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  L. E. Johannessen,et al.  Vertical and horizontal transmission of nest site preferences in titmice , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  J. Sanz,et al.  Nest ornamentation in blue tits: is feather carrying ability a male status signal? , 2011 .

[44]  O. Vuolteenaho,et al.  Genetic analysis of demography and selection in Lyrate rockcress (Arabidopsis lyrata) populations , 2013 .

[45]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[47]  K. Laland Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[48]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  Janne-Tuomas Seppänen,et al.  Interspecific Social Learning: Novel Preference Can Be Acquired from a Competing Species , 2007, Current Biology.

[50]  J. Nieh,et al.  Olfactory eavesdropping by a competitively foraging stingless bee, Trigona spinipes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  J. Henrich,et al.  The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[52]  L. Chittka,et al.  Mechanisms of social learning across species boundaries , 2013 .

[53]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review , 2002 .

[54]  C. Heyes,et al.  Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .

[55]  Susan K. Perry,et al.  The Biology of Traditions: Models and Evidence , 2008 .

[56]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  Evolution of social learning does not explain the origin of human cumulative culture. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  Seppo Rytkönen,et al.  Do pied flycatchers prefer nest boxes with old nest material , 1993 .

[58]  E. Virtanen,et al.  Effects of haulm killing and gibberellic acid on seed potato ( Solanum tuberosum L. ) and techniques for micro- and minituber production in northern latitudes , 2014 .

[59]  E. Danchin,et al.  The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? , 2005 .

[60]  I. Coolen,et al.  Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .

[61]  M. Lambrechts,et al.  Aromatic herbs in Corsican blue tit nests: The ‘Potpourri’ hypothesis , 2000 .

[62]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  G. Turner The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2001, Heredity.

[64]  E. Vatka Boreal populations facing climatic and habitat changes , 2014 .

[65]  Nordell,et al.  Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .

[66]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.

[67]  J. Blas,et al.  Raptor Nest Decorations Are a Reliable Threat Against Conspecifics , 2011, Science.

[68]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Genetic Variation for Habitat Preference: Evidence and Explanations , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[69]  Suvi Ponnikas Establishing conservation management for avian threatened species , 2014 .

[70]  B. Doligez,et al.  Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[71]  A. Mesoudi Foresight in cultural evolution , 2008 .

[72]  K. E. Bonnie,et al.  Expanding the scope for social information use , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[73]  H. Pöysä Public information and conspecific nest parasitism in goldeneyes: targeting safe nests by parasites , 2006 .

[74]  J. Forsman,et al.  Flycatchers Copy Conspecifics in Nest-Site Selection but Neither Personal Experience nor Frequency of Tutors Have an Effect , 2013, PloS one.

[75]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Rethinking Heredity, Again , 2022 .

[76]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  The use of field–based social information in eusocial foragers: local enhancement among nestmates and heterospecifics in stingless bees , 2003 .

[77]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Brain size, innovative propensity and migratory behaviour in temperate Palaearctic birds , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  A. Møller,et al.  Effects of a Dipteran Ectoparasite on Immune Response and Growth Trade-Offs in Barn Swallow, Hirundo rustica, Nestlings , 1998 .

[79]  S. Merino,et al.  Nest-Dwelling Ectoparasites of Two Sympatric Hole-Nesting Passerines in Relation to Nest Composition: An Experimental Study , 2009 .

[80]  Janne-Tuomas Seppänen,et al.  Observed heterospecific clutch size can affect offspring investment decisions , 2012, Biology Letters.

[81]  T. Mazgajski Effect of Old Nest Material on Nest Site Selection and Breeding Parameters in Secondary Hole Nesters — a Review , 2007 .

[82]  M. Myllykoski Structure and function of the myelin enzyme 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide 3′-phosphodiesterase , 2013 .

[83]  T. Slagsvold Competition between the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in the breeding season. , 1975 .

[84]  T. Day,et al.  The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments , 2011, Evolutionary applications.

[85]  Olli J. Loukola,et al.  Pied flycatchers nest over other nests, but would prefer not to , 2014 .

[86]  Tore Slagsvold,et al.  Social learning in birds and its role in shaping a foraging niche , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[87]  A. Hinks,et al.  Cognitive Ability Influences Reproductive Life History Variation in the Wild , 2012, Current Biology.

[88]  A. Barbosa,et al.  SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS DUE TO SEX, AGE AND MORPHO- LOGY IN GREAT TITS PARUS MAJOR WINTERING IN A MOUNTAINOUS HABITAT OF CENTRAL SPAIN , 2000 .

[89]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.

[90]  Robert J. Fletcher,et al.  Social-Information use in Heterogeneous Landscapes: A Prospectus , 2010 .

[91]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Resource allocation between reproductive phases: the importance of thermal conditions in determining the cost of incubation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[92]  D. Biro,et al.  Experimental identification of social learning in wild animals , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[93]  I. Coolen,et al.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[94]  J. Holm Catalytic pretreatment and hydrolysis of fibre sludge into reducing sugars , 2013 .

[95]  Pavlo Ardanov Priming capacities of endophytic Methylobacterium sp. on potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) , 2013 .

[96]  T. Uller,et al.  The Price equation and extended inheritance , 2010 .

[97]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Extended phenotypes as signals , 2009, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[98]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[99]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[100]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Conspecific and Heterospecific Cues Override Resource Quality to Influence Offspring Production , 2013, PloS one.