16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis of a Large Collection of Environmental and Clinical Unidentifiable Bacterial Isolates

ABSTRACT Some bacteria are difficult to identify with phenotypic identification schemes commonly used outside reference laboratories. 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA)-based identification of bacteria potentially offers a useful alternative when phenotypic characterization methods fail. However, as yet, the usefulness of 16S rDNA sequence analysis in the identification of conventionally unidentifiable isolates has not been evaluated with a large collection of isolates. In this study, we evaluated the utility of 16S rDNA sequencing as a means to identify a collection of 177 such isolates obtained from environmental, veterinary, and clinical sources. For 159 isolates (89.8%) there was at least one sequence in GenBank that yielded a similarity score of ≥97%, and for 139 isolates (78.5%) there was at least one sequence in GenBank that yielded a similarity score of ≥99%. These similarity score values were used to defined identification at the genus and species levels, respectively. For isolates identified to the species level, conventional identification failed to produce accurate results because of inappropriate biochemical profile determination in 76 isolates (58.7%), Gram staining in 16 isolates (11.6%), oxidase and catalase activity determination in 5 isolates (3.6%) and growth requirement determination in 2 isolates (1.5%). Eighteen isolates (10.2%) remained unidentifiable by 16S rDNA sequence analysis but were probably prototype isolates of new species. These isolates originated mainly from environmental sources (P = 0.07). The 16S rDNA approach failed to identify Enterobacter andPantoea isolates to the species level (P = 0.04; odds ratio = 0.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 1.14]). Elsewhere, the usefulness of 16S rDNA sequencing was compromised by the presence of 16S rDNA sequences with >1% undetermined positions in the databases. Unlike phenotypic identification, which can be modified by the variability of expression of characters, 16S rDNA sequencing provides unambiguous data even for rare isolates, which are reproducible in and between laboratories. The increase in accurate new 16S rDNA sequences and the development of alternative genes for molecular identification of certain taxa should further improve the usefulness of molecular identification of bacteria.

[1]  S. Goodison,et al.  16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  S. Morré,et al.  Pooling of Urine Specimens for Detection of Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis Infections by PCR in a Low-Prevalence Population: Cost-Saving Strategy for Epidemiological Studies and Screening Programs , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  Nicole M. Ellis,et al.  Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Techniques for Identification of Unusual Aerobic Pathogenic Gram-Negative Bacilli , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  D. Relman,et al.  Identification of the uncultured bacillus of Whipple's disease. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. Persing,et al.  Identification of Coryneform Bacterial Isolates by Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  Erko Stackebrandt,et al.  Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology , 1994 .

[8]  W. A. Clark,et al.  Identification of unusual pathogenic gram-negative aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria , 1985 .

[9]  J R Davis,et al.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms , 1992, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[10]  Philippe Dessen,et al.  BISANCE: a French service for access to biomolecular sequence databases , 1990, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[11]  D. Raoult,et al.  A simple method for amplification of DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  M. Collins,et al.  Comparative analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and related species on the basis of reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. , 1991, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[13]  G. Muyzer,et al.  Molecular identification of bacteria from a coculture by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S ribosomal DNA fragments as a tool for isolation in pure cultures , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  E. Baron,et al.  Identification of Unusual Pathogenic Gram-Negative Aerobic and Facultatively Anaerobic Bacteria , 1997 .

[15]  S. Jeffery.  Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1979 .

[16]  D. Raoult,et al.  Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana endocarditis in three homeless men. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  O. Kandler,et al.  Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  F. Cohan,et al.  Discovery and classification of ecological diversity in the bacterial world: the role of DNA sequence data. , 1997, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[20]  G. Wang,et al.  The frequency of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR co-amplification of 16S rRNA genes from different bacterial species. , 1996, Microbiology.

[21]  R. Christen,et al.  Sequence heterogeneities among 16S ribosomal RNA sequences, and their effect on phylogenetic analyses at the species level. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  J. G. Kuenen,et al.  Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete , 1999, Nature.

[23]  Ross A. Overbeek,et al.  The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  G. Muyzer,et al.  Identification of bacteria in a biodegraded wall painting by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[25]  R A Clayton,et al.  Intraspecific variation in small-subunit rRNA sequences in GenBank: why single sequences may not adequately represent prokaryotic taxa. , 1995, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[26]  G. Fox,et al.  How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. , 1992, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[27]  D. Raoult,et al.  Stenotrophomonas africana sp. nov., an opportunistic human pathogen in Africa. , 1997, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[28]  Didier Raoult,et al.  rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification , 1997, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  G. Wang,et al.  Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[30]  T. Jukes.  CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[31]  Henry D. Isenberg,et al.  Manual of Clinical Microbiology , 1991 .