Changes in dive profiles as an indicator of feeding success in king and Adélie penguins

Determining when and how deep avian divers feed remains a challenge despite technical advances. Systems that record oesophageal temperature are able to determine rate of prey ingestion with a high level of accuracy but technical problems still remain to be solved. Here we examine the validity of using changes in depth profiles to infer feeding activity in free-ranging penguins, as more accessible proxies of their feeding success. We used oesophageal temperature loggers with fast temperature sensors, deployed in tandem with time-depth recorders, on king and Adelie penguins. In the king penguin, a high correspondence was found between the number of ingestions recorded per dive and the number of wiggles during the bottom and the ascent part of the dives. In the Adelie penguins, which feed on smaller prey, the number of large temperature drops was linearly related to the number of undulations per dive. The analysis of change in depth profiles from high-resolution time-depth recorders can provide key information to enhance the study of feeding rate and foraging success of these predators. Such potential is especially relevant in the context of using Southern marine top predators to study change in availability of marine resources.

[1]  Lloyd S. Davis,et al.  PENGUINS: PARADOXES AND PATTERNS , 1999 .

[2]  C. Bost,et al.  Seasonal changes in the diving parameters of king penguins (Aptenodytespatagonicus) , 2002 .

[3]  Y. Naito,et al.  Penguin–mounted cameras glimpse underwater group behaviour , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Y. Naito,et al.  Validation of oesophagus temperature recording for detection of prey ingestion on captive Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) , 2000 .

[5]  C. Bost,et al.  Feeding of diving predators and diel vertical migration of prey: King penguins¹ diet versus trawl sampling at Kerguelen Islands , 2002 .

[6]  Y. Naito,et al.  Do Adélie penguins modify their foraging behaviour in pursuit of different prey? , 2002 .

[7]  Wilson,et al.  Reliability of stomach temperature changes in determining feeding characteristics of seabirds , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Preliminary investigations of prey pursuit and capture by king penguins at sea , 2000 .

[9]  Y. Naito,et al.  Krill-feeding behaviour in a chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica compared with fish-eating in Magellanic penguins Spheniscus magellanicus: a pilot study , 2004 .

[10]  Sue Jackson,et al.  Patterns of respiration in diving penguins: is the last gasp an inspired tactic? , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  K. Reinhardt,et al.  THE BIRDS OF THE POTTER PENINSULA, KING GEORGE ISLAND, SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS, ANTARCTICA, 1965_1998 , 1998 .

[12]  J. Croxall,et al.  Environmental response of upper trophic-level predators reveals a system change in an Antarctic marine ecosystem , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Y. Cherel,et al.  The diving behaviour of brooding king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) from the Falkland Islands: variation in dive profiles and synchronous underwater swimming provide new insights into their foraging strategies , 2005 .

[14]  G L Kooyman,et al.  Prey ingestion revealed by oesophagus and stomach temperature recordings in cormorants. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  P. Dann,et al.  The penguins : ecology and management , 1995 .

[16]  V. Ridoux,et al.  The diets of five summer breeding seabirds in Adélie Land, Antarctica , 2004, Polar Biology.

[17]  Y. Cherel,et al.  Prey species and nutritive value of food fed during summer to King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonica chicks at Possession Island, Crozet Archipelago , 2008 .

[18]  Y. Handrich,et al.  Hypothermia in foraging king penguins , 1997, Nature.

[19]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Pelagic seabirds and the marine environment: foraging patterns of wandering albatrosses in relation to prey availability and distribution , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Rachel M. Jeffreys,et al.  Deep-Sea Research II , 2008 .

[21]  J. Burger,et al.  Seabirds: Feeding Ecology and Role in Marine Ecosystems , 2009 .

[22]  Yan Ropert-Coudert,et al.  Rush and grab strategies in foraging marine endotherms: the case for haste in penguins , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Yan Ropert-Coudert,et al.  Foraging strategies and prey encounter rate of free-ranging Little Penguins , 2006 .

[24]  Yves Handrich,et al.  Foraging habitat and food intake of satellite-tracked king penguins during the austral summer at Crozet Archipelago , 1997 .

[25]  C. McQuaid,et al.  Land-based predator impact on vertically migrating zooplankton and micronekton advected to a Southern Ocean archipelago , 1992 .

[26]  C. Bost,et al.  Seabirds as bio-indicators of changing marine ecosystems: new perspectives , 1993 .

[27]  Yves Handrich,et al.  Feeding behaviour of free–ranging penguins determined by oesophageal temperature , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Yasuhiko Naito,et al.  Feeding strategies of free-ranging Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae analysed by multiple data recording , 2001, Polar Biology.

[29]  C. Bost,et al.  Feeding Behavior of Free‐Ranging King Penguins (Aptenodytes Patagonicus) , 1994 .

[30]  Y. Ropert‐Coudert,et al.  Lip-reading in remote subjects: an attempt to quantify and separate ingestion, breathing and vocalisation in free-living animals using penguins as a model , 2002 .

[31]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Trends and perspectives in animal‐attached remote sensing , 2005 .