Adapting locomotion to different surface compliances: neuromuscular responses and changes in movement dynamics.

Knowledge of how the nervous system deals with surfaces with different physical properties such as compliance that challenge balance during locomotion is of importance as we are constantly faced with these situations every day. The purpose of this study was to examine the control of center of mass (COM) and lower limb dynamics and recovery response modulation of muscle activity during locomotion across an unexpected compliant surface and in particular, scaling behavior across different levels of compliance. Eight young adults walked along a walkway and stepped on an unexpected compliant surface in the middle of the travel path. There were three different levels of surface compliance, and participants experienced either no compliant surface or one of the three compliant surfaces during each trial that were presented in a blocked or random fashion. Whole body kinematics were collected along with surface electromyography (EMG) of selected bilateral lower limb and trunk muscles. The recovery response to the first compliant-surface trial demonstrated muscle onset latencies between 97 and 175 ms, and activity was modulated while on the compliant surface. Vertical COM trajectory was not preserved after contact with the compliant surface: peak vertical COM, while on the compliant surface was lower than when on stable ground. Perturbed-limb knee flexion after toe-off increased with increased surface compliance, which enabled toe clearance with the ground to be similar to control trials. The results suggest that stepping off of a compliant surface is actively modulated by the CNS and is geared toward maintaining dynamic stability.

[1]  D G Watt,et al.  Responses of cats to sudden falls: an otolith-originating reflex assisting landing. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A E Patla,et al.  Phase-dependent compensatory responses to perturbation applied during walking in humans. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Phase-dependent reflex reversal in human leg muscles during walking. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[5]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Corrective responses to loss of ground support during walking. I. Intact cats. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Pearson,et al.  Suppression of the corrective response to loss of ground support by stimulation of extensor group I afferents. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Duysens,et al.  Dynamic Control of Location-Specific Information in Tactile Cutaneous Reflexes from the Foot during Human Walking , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  E. Zehr,et al.  Cutaneous reflexes during human gait: electromyographic and kinematic responses to electrical stimulation. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Interaction of leg stiffness and surfaces stiffness during human hopping. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[10]  A E Patla,et al.  Intralimb dynamics simplify reactive control strategies during locomotion. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Mechanism of leg stiffness adjustment for hopping on surfaces of different stiffnesses. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Control of reactive balance adjustments in perturbed human walking: roles of proximal and distal postural muscle activity , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Phase-dependent modulation of proximal and distal postural responses to slips in young and older adults. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[15]  J. Duysens,et al.  Widespread short-latency stretch reflexes and their modulation during stumbling over obstacles , 1999, Brain Research.

[16]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Duysens,et al.  Muscular responses and movement strategies during stumbling over obstacles. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M J McDonagh,et al.  Stretch reflex distinguished from pre‐programmed muscle activations following landing impacts in man , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. Duysens,et al.  Abeta fibers mediate cutaneous reflexes during human walking. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Mechanisms of failed recovery following postural perturbations on a motorized treadmill mimic those associated with an actual forward trip. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  M. Mcdonagh,et al.  Interaction of pre‐programmed control and natural stretch reflexes in human landing movements , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  A. Patla,et al.  Strategies for dynamic stability during locomotion on a slippery surface: effects of prior experience and knowledge. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  P. H. J. A Nieuwenhuijzen,et al.  Mechanically induced ankle inversion during human walking and jumping , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  Amy E. Kerdok,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  A. Patla,et al.  Role of the unperturbed limb and arms in the reactive recovery response to an unexpected slip during locomotion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Multiple-step strategies to recover from stumbling perturbations. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[27]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associated with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[28]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[29]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Human hopping on damped surfaces: strategies for adjusting leg mechanics , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  C. Detrembleur,et al.  Energy cost, mechanical work, and efficiency of hemiparetic walking. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[31]  J. Duysens,et al.  Phase-dependent reversal of reflexly induced movements during human gait , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Chet T Moritz,et al.  Passive dynamics change leg mechanics for an unexpected surface during human hopping. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[33]  J. Duysens,et al.  Gating and reversal of reflexes in ankle muscles during human walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  D. Winter,et al.  Strategies for recovery from a trip in early and late swing during human walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Neuromuscular changes for hopping on a range of damped surfaces. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[36]  Conrad Wall,et al.  Recovery from perturbations during paced walking. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[37]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  The role of active forces and intersegmental dynamics in the control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Marco Santello,et al.  Review of motor control mechanisms underlying impact absorption from falls. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[39]  M. Bobbert,et al.  How early reactions in the support limb contribute to balance recovery after tripping. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.