Standard Diffusion in Growing Networks: Modeling Interaction Patterns

Size matters for standardization efforts: Newly introduced, more efficient standards are often disadvantaged because they have smaller networks. Networks for commercial and technical collaboration – for instance in passenger transportation – however, suggest that network size is not all that matters. Network effect models should also account for specific interaction patterns and growth processes. Emerging islands of shared technologies may then be explained by close-knit, non-proportional interactions among members of alliances and the like. To test the effects of proportionality, degree of interaction, and preferentiality, we model standard diffusion in a growing network of organizations linked through different patterns of interaction. Extreme case analysis and agent-based simulation show that proportional and non-proportional interactions have different, non-monotonic effects on standardization outcomes. Proportional interactions – formed as a function of a growing network size – result in a path-dependent trajectory where an increasing number of links promote one standard’s dominance. Non-proportional interactions, in contrast, limit network effects: Multi-standard persistence becomes more likely as new agents are less dependent on the total number of adopters in the network. We illustrate theoretical implications and planned next steps for assessing diffusion scenarios of a new standard in airline IT and distribution.

[1]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[2]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[3]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[4]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[5]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[6]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[7]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[8]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[9]  Xing Hu,et al.  Revenue Sharing in Airline Alliances , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  Reconsidering Network Effect Theory , 2000, ECIS.

[11]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  A Unified Economic Model of Standard Diffusion: The Impact of Standardization Cost, Network Effects, and Network Topology , 2006, MIS Q..

[12]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[13]  Allan Afuah Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct , 2013 .

[14]  Jean-Philippe Vergne,et al.  The Missing Link between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications , 2010 .

[15]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Lock-Ins in Network Effect Markets -- Results of a Simulation Study , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Roman Beck,et al.  Network effects as drivers of individual technology adoption: Analyzing adoption and diffusion of mobile communication services , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[17]  T. Valente Network Interventions , 2012, Science.

[18]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[19]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[20]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  The Standardization Problem: An Economic Analysis of Standards in Information Systems , 1999 .

[21]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box , 2009 .

[22]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[23]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Hidden Geometry of Complex, Network-Driven Contagion Phenomena , 2013, Science.

[24]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence , 2015 .

[25]  H. White,et al.  A Model of Robust Positions in Social Networks , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.