Matrix Methods for Optimal Manifesting of Multinode Space Exploration Systems

This paper presents matrix-based methods to determine optimal cargo manifests for supplying resources in a space exploration system. An exploration system consists of transports (both in-space and on-surface) and resource demands occurring during both transportation between nodes and exploration at nodes. Each transport is defined by origin and destination nodes, departure and arrival times, and a cargo capacity. Matrices represent cargo carried by transports, cargo used to satisfy demands, and cargo transferred to other transports. The resulting matrix formulation is equivalent to a network flow problem representing the transportation of resources through a time-expanded network. The formulation allows for evaluating general exploration system feasibility by determining if a solution exists to a linear program (LP). In addition to modeling the manifesting problem, a few metrics, such as the transport criticality index, are formulated to allow for analysis and comparisons. The proposed matrix manifest modeling methods are demonstrated with a notional lunar exploration exploration system comprised of 32 transports including 8 cargo and 9 crewed landings at a base at the Lunar South Pole and several surface excursions to Malapert Crater and Schrodinger Basin. It is found that carry-along and pre-positioning logistics strategies can yield different manifesting solutions in which transport criticality varies. For the specific scenario considered in this study, it is found that transport criticality is larger for a pre-positioning strategy (mean value of 3.02) as compared to a carry-along case (mean-value of 1.99).

[1]  L G Pugh The logistics of the polar journeys of Scott, Shackleton and Amundsen. , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  H. D. Ratliff,et al.  Note—Some Equivalent Objectives for Dynamic Network Flow Problems , 1982 .

[3]  Moshe Kress Structure, Terminology and Analytic Tools , 2002 .

[4]  R. G. Blackadar Field Methods and Logistics: Arctic Canada , 1961 .

[5]  Afreen Siddiqi,et al.  A Flexible Architecture and Object-oriented Model for Space Logistics Simulation , 2009 .

[6]  Donald L Carr Into the Unknown: The Logistics Preparation of the Lewis and Clark Expedition , 2011 .

[7]  Darwin Klingman,et al.  OR Practice - A Logistics Planning System at W. R. Grace , 1988, Oper. Res..

[8]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Time-expanded decision networks: A framework for designing evolvable complex systems , 2007 .

[9]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows , 2011 .

[10]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Matrix Modeling Methods for Spaceflight Campaign Logistics Analysis , 2009 .

[11]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  Diagnosing infeasibilities in network flow problems , 1998, Math. Program..

[12]  Kriss J. Kennedy,et al.  Constellation Architecture Team-Lunar Scenario 12.0 Habitation Overview , 2010 .

[13]  Patrick A. Troutman,et al.  Surface buildup scenarios and outpost architectures for Lunar Exploration , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[14]  Moshe Kress,et al.  Operational Logistics: The Art and Science of Sustaining Military Operations , 2002 .

[15]  Giulio Zotteri,et al.  Introduction to Distribution Logistics , 2013 .

[16]  Sarah A. Shull Integrated Modeling and Simulation of Lunar Exploration Campaign Logistics , 2007 .

[17]  David P. Morton,et al.  Optimizing Military Airlift , 2002, Oper. Res..