Joint species distribution modeling with competition for space

Joint species distribution models (JSDM) are among the most important statistical tools in community ecology. However, existing JSDMs cannot model mutual exclusion between species. We tackle this deficiency in the context of modeling plant percentage cover data, where mutual exclusion arises from limited growing space and competition for light. We propose a hierarchical JSDM where latent Gaussian variable models describe species’ niche preferences and Dirichlet-Multinomial distribution models the observation process and competition between species. We also propose a decision theoretic model comparison and validation approach to assess the goodness of JSDMs in four different types of predictive tasks. We apply our models and methods to a case study on modeling vegetation cover in a boreal peatland. Our results show that ignoring the interspecific interactions and competition reduces models’ predictive performance and leads to biased estimates for total percentage cover. Models’ relative predictive performance also depends on the predictive task highlighting that model comparison and assessment should resemble the true predictive task. Our results also demonstrate that the proposed JSDM can be used to simultaneously infer interspecific correlations in niche preference as well as mutual competition for space and through that provide novel insight into ecological research.

[1]  J. Vanhatalo,et al.  Effects of Ignoring Survey Design Information for Data Reuse. , 2021, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  J. Arbel,et al.  On the Interpretations of Joint Modeling in Community Ecology. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  A. Laine,et al.  Modelling the habitat preference of two key Sphagnum species in a poor fen as controlled by capitulum water content , 2020 .

[4]  W. Link,et al.  A Bayesian Dirichlet process community occupancy model to estimate community structure and species similarity. , 2020, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Nerea Abrego,et al.  Joint Species Distribution Modelling: With Applications in R , 2020 .

[6]  Francis K. C. Hui,et al.  Model-based ordination of pin-point cover data: effect of management on dry heathland , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  D. Gravel,et al.  Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. , 2020, Ecology letters.

[8]  J. Vanhatalo,et al.  Additive Multivariate Gaussian Processes for Joint Species Distribution Modeling with Heterogeneous Data , 2018, Bayesian Analysis.

[9]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Varying Vegetation Composition, Respiration and Photosynthesis Decrease Temporal Variability of the CO2 Sink in a Boreal Bog , 2019, Ecosystems.

[10]  David B. Dunson,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of predictive performance of 33 species distribution models at species and community levels , 2019, Ecological Monographs.

[11]  J. Vanhatalo,et al.  Integrating experimental and distribution data to predict future species patterns , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[12]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Spatial Joint Species Distribution Modeling using Dirichlet Processes , 2017, 1711.05646.

[13]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  A comparison of joint species distribution models for presence–absence data , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[14]  Jarno Vanhatalo,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian model reveals the distributional shifts of Arctic marine mammals , 2018 .

[15]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Peatland vegetation composition and phenology drive the seasonal trajectory of maximum gross primary production , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Joint Species Distribution Modeling: Dimension Reduction Using Dirichlet Processes , 2017 .

[17]  E. Sinclair,et al.  Modeling joint abundance of multiple species using Dirichlet process mixtures , 2017 .

[18]  Jarno Vanhatalo,et al.  Modeling the spatial distribution of larval fish abundance provides essential information for management , 2017 .

[19]  D. Dunson,et al.  Using joint species distribution models for evaluating how species‐to‐species associations depend on the environmental context , 2017 .

[20]  James S. Clark,et al.  Generalized joint attribute modeling for biodiversity analysis: median-zero, multivariate, multifarious data , 2017 .

[21]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Using latent variable models to identify large networks of species‐to‐species associations at different spatial scales , 2016 .

[22]  Francis K. C. Hui,et al.  So Many Variables: Joint Modeling in Community Ecology. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Kai Zhu,et al.  More than the sum of the parts: forest climate response from joint species distribution models. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  Laura J. Pollock,et al.  Understanding co‐occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) , 2014 .

[25]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions , 2013, Ecology letters.

[26]  G. Bhullar,et al.  Methane transport and emissions from soil as affected by water table and vascular plants , 2013, BMC Ecology.

[27]  Francis K C Hui,et al.  To mix or not to mix: comparing the predictive performance of mixture models vs. separate species distribution models. , 2013, Ecology.

[28]  David I. Warton,et al.  Finite Mixture of Regression Modeling for High-Dimensional Count and Biomass Data in Ecology , 2013 .

[29]  K. Gardens The Plant List , 2013 .

[30]  Jarno Vanhatalo,et al.  Bayesian spatial multispecies modelling to assess pelagic fish stocks from acoustic- and trawl-survey data , 2012 .

[31]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  A survey of Bayesian predictive methods for model assessment, selection and comparison , 2012 .

[32]  E. Tuittila,et al.  Environmental control and spatial structures in peatland vegetation , 2011 .

[33]  P. Faubert,et al.  Non-methane biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from boreal peatland microcosms under warming and water table drawdown , 2011 .

[34]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Making more out of sparse data: hierarchical modeling of species communities. , 2011, Ecology.

[35]  A. M. Schmidt,et al.  Modelling Multivariate Counts Varying Continuously in Space , 2011 .

[36]  E. Tuittila,et al.  The role of Sphagnum mosses in the methane cycling of a boreal mire. , 2010, Ecology.

[37]  P. Faubert,et al.  Contribution of vegetation and water table on isoprene emission from boreal peatland microcosms , 2009 .

[38]  Dorota Kurowicka,et al.  Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method , 2009, J. Multivar. Anal..

[39]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[40]  A. Raftery,et al.  Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness , 2007 .

[41]  Christopher J Paciorek,et al.  Spatial modelling using a new class of nonstationary covariance functions , 2006, Environmetrics.

[42]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Explaining Species Distribution Patterns through Hierarchical Modeling , 2006 .

[43]  Michel Denuit,et al.  Constraints on concordance measures in bivariate discrete data , 2005 .

[44]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  Nonstationary multivariate process modeling through spatially varying coregionalization , 2004 .

[45]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[46]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage , 2000 .

[47]  G. Heilig The greenhouse gas methane (CH4): Sources and sinks, the impact of population growth, possible interventions , 1994 .

[48]  E. Gorham Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[49]  K. A. Kennedy,et al.  SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF VISUAL ESTIMATES OF PLANT COVER IN BIOMONITORING , 1987 .