An approach to develop chemical intuition for atomistic electron transport calculations using basis set rotations.

Single molecule conductance measurements are often interpreted through computational modeling, but the complexity of these calculations makes it difficult to directly link them to simpler concepts and models. Previous work has attempted to make this connection using maximally localized Wannier functions and symmetry adapted basis sets, but their use can be ambiguous and non-trivial. Starting from a Hamiltonian and overlap matrix written in a hydrogen-like basis set, we demonstrate a simple approach to obtain a new basis set that is chemically more intuitive and allows interpretation in terms of simple concepts and models. By diagonalizing the Hamiltonians corresponding to each atom in the molecule, we obtain a basis set that can be partitioned into pseudo-σ and -π and allows partitioning of the Landuaer-Büttiker transmission as well as create simple Hückel models that reproduce the key features of the full calculation. This method provides a link between complex calculations and simple concepts and models to provide intuition or extract parameters for more complex model systems.

[1]  S. Louie,et al.  Conductance and geometry of pyridine-linked single-molecule junctions. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  S. F. Boys Construction of Some Molecular Orbitals to Be Approximately Invariant for Changes from One Molecule to Another , 1960 .

[3]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  Partly occupied Wannier functions. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Nitzan,et al.  Raman Scattering and Electronic Heating in Molecular Conduction Junctions , 2011 .

[5]  Breakdown of interference rules in azulene, a nonalternant hydrocarbon. , 2014, Nano letters.

[6]  N. A. Romero,et al.  Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[7]  R. Stadler Comment on "Breakdown of Interference Rules in Azulene, a Nonalternant Hydrocarbon". , 2015, Nano letters.

[8]  Meir,et al.  Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[9]  N. Marzari,et al.  Maximally-localized Wannier Functions: Theory and Applications , 2011, 1112.5411.

[10]  K. Thygesen,et al.  The relation between structure and quantum interference in single molecule junctions. , 2010, Nano letters.

[11]  Jean-Luc Brédas,et al.  Single-electron transistor of a single organic molecule with access to several redox states , 2003, Nature.

[12]  Kristian Sommer Thygesen,et al.  Localized atomic basis set in the projector augmented wave method , 2009, 1303.0348.

[13]  S. Louie,et al.  Amine-gold linked single-molecule circuits: experiment and theory. , 2007, Nano letters.

[14]  F. Weinhold,et al.  Natural population analysis , 1985 .

[15]  K. Thygesen,et al.  Graphical prediction of quantum interference-induced transmission nodes in functionalized organic molecules. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[16]  H. Günthard,et al.  The microwave spectrum and dipole moment of azulene , 1965 .

[17]  Magnus Paulsson,et al.  Transmission eigenchannels from nonequilibrium Green's functions , 2007, cond-mat/0702295.

[18]  Electron transport through an interacting region: The case of a nonorthogonal basis set , 2005, cond-mat/0509317.

[19]  M. Sancho,et al.  Highly convergent schemes for the calculation of bulk and surface Green functions , 1985 .

[20]  P. Löwdin On the Non‐Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals , 1950 .

[21]  Karsten W. Jacobsen,et al.  An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code , 2002, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[22]  S. Datta,et al.  CONDUCTANCE SPECTRA OF MOLECULAR WIRES , 1998 .

[23]  M. Ratner,et al.  Electron transport through conjugated molecules: when the pi system only tells part of the story. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[24]  Angel Rubio,et al.  Conserving GW scheme for nonequilibrium quantum transport in molecular contacts , 2007, 0710.0482.

[25]  Frank Weinhold,et al.  Natural hybrid orbitals , 1980 .

[26]  M. Strange,et al.  On the illusory connection between cross-conjugation and quantum interference , 2015, 1510.06015.

[27]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[28]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method , 2004, cond-mat/0411218.

[29]  J. Hummelen,et al.  Electric-Field Control of Interfering Transport Pathways in a Single-Molecule Anthraquinone Transistor. , 2015, Nano letters.

[30]  M. Reuter,et al.  Communication: Finding destructive interference features in molecular transport junctions. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  N. Marzari,et al.  Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands , 2001, cond-mat/0108084.

[32]  S. Louie,et al.  Mechanically controlled binary conductance switching of a single-molecule junction. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[33]  S. Louie,et al.  Renormalization of molecular electronic levels at metal-molecule interfaces. , 2006, Physical Review Letters.

[34]  R. S. Mulliken Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I , 1955 .