Predicting off-target effects for end-to-end CRISPR guide design
暂无分享,去创建一个
Michael M. Weinstein | Jennifer Listgarten | Melih Elibol | Luong Hoang | John G. Doench | Nicolo Fusi | J. Listgarten | Luong Hoang | Nicoló Fusi | J. Doench | Michael Weinstein | Melih Elibol
[1] D. Cox,et al. An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .
[2] Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates,et al. Fast and Practical Approximate String Matching , 1992, Inf. Process. Lett..
[3] David H. Wolpert,et al. Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.
[4] Peter Norvig,et al. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .
[5] Yoav Freund,et al. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.
[6] Leonard E. Trigg,et al. Naive Bayes for regression , 1998 .
[7] Leonard E. Trigg,et al. Technical Note: Naive Bayes for Regression , 2000, Machine Learning.
[8] Radford M. Neal. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.
[9] Eli J. Fine,et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.
[10] E. Lander,et al. Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.
[11] M. Boutros,et al. E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification , 2014, Nature Methods.
[12] Meagan E. Sullender,et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.
[13] Jin-Soo Kim,et al. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases , 2014, Bioinform..
[14] Mazhar Adli,et al. Cas9-chromatin binding information enables more accurate CRISPR off-target prediction , 2015, Nucleic acids research.
[15] G. Church,et al. Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach , 2015, Nature Methods.
[16] Xiaoling Wang,et al. Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.
[17] Clifford A. Meyer,et al. Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design , 2015, Genome research.
[18] Martin J. Aryee,et al. GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.
[19] Charles E. Vejnar,et al. CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR/Cas9 targeting in vivo , 2015, Nature Methods.
[20] J. L. Mateo,et al. CCTop: An Intuitive, Flexible and Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Target Prediction Tool , 2015, PloS one.
[21] Jong-il Kim,et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells , 2015, Nature Methods.
[22] N. Perrimon,et al. Identification of potential drug targets for tuberous sclerosis complex by synthetic screens combining CRISPR-based knockouts with RNAi , 2015, Science Signaling.
[23] Kornel Labun,et al. CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..
[24] Jin-Soo Kim,et al. Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq , 2016, Genome research.
[25] Jin-Soo Kim,et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.
[26] Meagan E. Sullender,et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.
[27] T. Golub,et al. Genomic Copy Number Dictates a Gene-Independent Cell Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting. , 2016, Cancer discovery.
[28] J. Kent,et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR , 2016, Genome Biology.
[29] Wei Li,et al. CRISPR-DO for genome-wide CRISPR design and optimization , 2016, Bioinform..
[30] Correction: CCTop: An Intuitive, Flexible and Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Target Prediction Tool , 2017, PloS one.