Star-Mesh Quantized Hall Array Resistance Devices

Advances in the development of graphene-based technology have enabled improvements in DC resistance metrology. Devices made from epitaxially grown graphene have replaced the GaAs-based counterparts, leading to an easier and more accessible realization of the ohm. By optimizing the scale of the growth, it has become possible to fabricate quantized Hall array resistance standards (QHARS) with nominal values between 1 k{\Omega} and 1.29 M{\Omega}. One of these QHARS device designs accommodates a value of about 1.01 M{\Omega}, which made it an ideal candidate to pursue a proof-of-concept that graphene-based QHARS devices are suitable for forming wye-delta resistance networks. In this work, the 1.01 M{\Omega} array output nearly 20.6 M{\Omega} due to the wye-delta transformation, which itself is a special case of star-mesh transformations. These mathematical equivalence principles allow one to extend the QHR to the 100 M{\Omega} and 10 G{\Omega} resistance levels with fewer array elements than would be necessary for a single array with many more elements in series. The 1.01 M{\Omega} device shows promise that the wye-delta transformation can shorten the calibration chain, and, more importantly, provide a chain with a more direct line to the quantum SI.

[1]  D. Newell,et al.  Dynamics of transient hole doping in epitaxial graphene , 2022, Physical Review B.

[2]  S. Yawale,et al.  Linear Circuits , 2021, Operational Amplifier.

[3]  J. Schurr,et al.  Graphene Quantum Hall Effect Devices for AC and DC Electrical Metrology , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[4]  D. Newell,et al.  Graphene quantum Hall effect parallel resistance arrays , 2021, Physical review. B.

[5]  Dean G. Jarrett,et al.  Comparison Between NIST Graphene and AIST GaAs Quantized Hall Devices , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[6]  Kwang Min Yu,et al.  Comparison of Multiple Methods for Obtaining P $\Omega$ Resistances With Low Uncertainties , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  D. Newell,et al.  Analytical determination of atypical quantized resistances in graphene p-n junctions. , 2020, Physica. B, Condensed matter.

[8]  Jaesung Park,et al.  Realization of 5 h e 2 with graphene quantum Hall resistance array , 2020, 2003.04467.

[9]  L. Callegaro,et al.  Implementation of a graphene quantum Hall Kelvin bridge-on-a-chip for resistance calibrations , 2020, Metrologia.

[10]  D. Newell,et al.  Next-generation crossover-free quantum Hall arrays with superconducting interconnections , 2019, Metrologia.

[11]  R. Elmquist,et al.  The quantum Hall effect in the era of the new SI , 2019, Semiconductor science and technology.

[12]  D. Newell,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy for rapid optical characterization of graphene , 2018, Communications Physics.

[13]  D. Newell,et al.  Probing the dielectric response of the interfacial buffer layer in epitaxial graphene via optical spectroscopy. , 2017, Physical review. B.

[14]  Taro Itatani,et al.  Development of 1-MΩ quantum Hall array resistance standards , 2016, 2016 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2016).

[15]  S. Novikov,et al.  Mini array of quantum Hall devices based on epitaxial graphene , 2015, 1512.03163.

[16]  R. Yakimova,et al.  A prototype of RK/200 quantum Hall array resistance standard on epitaxial graphene , 2015 .

[17]  B. Jeckelmann,et al.  Accurate high-ohmic resistance measurement techniques up to 1 PΩ , 2014, 29th Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2014).

[18]  R. Elmquist,et al.  Precision high-value resistance scaling with a two-terminal cryogenic current comparator. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[19]  Tian Shen,et al.  Graphene Epitaxial Growth on SiC(0001) for Resistance Standards , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[20]  K. Pierz,et al.  Precision quantization of Hall resistance in transferred graphene , 2012, 1203.1798.

[21]  R. Yakimova,et al.  Precision comparison of the quantum Hall effect in graphene and gallium arsenide , 2012, 1202.2985.

[22]  Klaus Pierz,et al.  Magnetic Field Reversible Serial Quantum Hall Arrays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  R. Yakimova,et al.  Anomalously strong pinning of the filling factor nu=2 in epitaxial graphene , 2010, 1009.3450.

[24]  M. Syväjärvi,et al.  Towards a quantum resistance standard based on epitaxial graphene. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[25]  D. G. Jarrett,et al.  Automated guarded bridge for calibration of multimegohm standard resistors , 1996, Proceedings of 20th Biennial Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements.

[26]  L C A Henderson,et al.  A new technique for the automatic measurement of high value resistors , 1987 .

[27]  V. V. Bapeswara Rao,et al.  Mesh-star transformation , 1974 .

[28]  C. Page Tetrahedral Junction Error Contribution to a Series-Parallel Four-Terminal Resistor , 1974 .

[29]  L. Versfeld,et al.  Remarks on star-mesh transformation of electrical networks , 1970 .

[30]  Harold A. Sauer,et al.  Wye-Delta Transfer Standards for Calibration of Wide Range dc Resistance and dc Conductance Bridges , 1968 .

[31]  D. Newell,et al.  Two-Terminal and Multi-Terminal Designs for Next-Generation Quantized Hall Resistance Standards: Contact Material and Geometry , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[32]  Karl Küpfmüller,et al.  Einführung in die theoretische Elektrotechnik , 1932 .