Modeling and simulation supporting the application of fuel cell & hydrogen technologies

Abstract This work aims to demonstrate the importance and usefulness of multiscale computational approaches and tools, as well as of reliable input data and verification procedures for fuel cells & hydrogen (FCH) technology applications. For that purpose, three typical case studies on the use of simulation models/tools at various scales for specific applications are examined. More specifically, these cases concern:  (i) the optimization of materials design for Fuel Cells via a novel process-based methodology; particularly the stochastic reconstruction and accurate characterization of carbon fiber-based matrices, which are commonly used as Gas Diffusion Layers (GDL) in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. The computational approach employs a rigorous model simulating the spatial distribution of the graphitized resin that is typically used to enhance the structural properties and thermal/electrical conductivities of the composite GDL materials;  (ii) the investigation of hydrogen safety related issues and scenarios, where characteristic examples of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) studies and associated benchmarking activities in particular applications are presented;  (iii) the optimization of hybrid Renewable Energy (RE) – hydrogen systems at real scale in remote/isolated communities like off-grid islands where cost effectiveness with regard to the produced energy is a critical factor. Besides the scientific and technical aspects, we would like through these examples to stress how complementarities and synergies between numerical and experimental research can greatly assist in closing knowledge gaps & developing innovative designs, and may contribute toward defragmentation of relevant efforts, more effective collaboration between researchers and provision of validated simulation tools.

[1]  Sadashige Horiguchi,et al.  Experimental study on the hazards of high-pressure hydrogen jet diffusion flames , 2009 .

[2]  A G Venetsanos,et al.  Source, dispersion and combustion modelling of an accidental release of hydrogen in an urban environment. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  Arthouros Zervos,et al.  Integration of wind and hydrogen technologies in the power system of Corvo island, Azores: A cost-be , 2011 .

[4]  Vladimir Molkov,et al.  CFD benchmark on hydrogen release and dispersion in a ventilated enclosure: Passive ventilation and the role of an external wind , 2015 .

[5]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[6]  Prankul Middha,et al.  CFD computations of liquid hydrogen releases , 2012 .

[7]  D. Makarov,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of premixed flame propagation with distorted tulip shape in a closed duct , 2012 .

[8]  Schwartz,et al.  Transport properties of disordered continuum systems. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[9]  A. Weber,et al.  Effective-Diffusivity Measurement of Partially-Saturated Fuel-Cell Gas-Diffusion Layers , 2012 .

[10]  C. Kiranoudis,et al.  CFD modeling of hydrogen deflagration in a tunnel , 2014 .

[11]  J. G. Bartzis,et al.  CFD modeling of large-scale LH2 spills in open environment , 2007 .

[12]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations in a tunnel , 2009 .

[13]  Elena Vyazmina,et al.  Validation and recommendations for FLACS CFD and engineering approaches to model hydrogen vented explosions: Effects of concentration, obstruction vent area and ignition position , 2016 .

[14]  Ozan Erdinc,et al.  Optimum design of hybrid renewable energy systems: Overview of different approaches , 2012 .

[15]  Vinod M. Janardhanan,et al.  Modeling Elementary Heterogeneous Chemistry and Electrochemistry in Solid-Oxide Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[16]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations with press , 2010 .

[17]  T. Jordan,et al.  Detonation wave propagation in semi-confined layers of hydrogen–air and hydrogen–oxygen mixtures , 2017 .

[18]  M. F. Ivanov,et al.  Mechanisms of high-pressure hydrogen gas self-ignition in tubes , 2008 .

[19]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  A Comparative Study of Turbulent Premixed Flames Propagating Past Repeated Obstacles , 2012 .

[20]  Matthew N. Swain,et al.  Experimental verification of a hydrogen risk assessment method , 1999 .

[21]  William G. Houf,et al.  Simulation of small-scale releases from liquid hydrogen storage systems , 2011 .

[22]  William G. Houf,et al.  Characterization of high-pressure, underexpanded hydrogen-jet flames , 2007 .

[23]  S. Dorofeev,et al.  Vented explosion overpressures from combustion of hydrogen and hydrocarbon mixtures , 2011 .

[24]  A. Friedrich,et al.  Medium-scale experiments on vented hydrogen deflagration , 2015 .

[25]  M. Heitsch,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to predict a hydrogen explosion in a simulated vehicle refuelling environment , 2009 .

[26]  A. G. Venetsanos,et al.  Study of key parameters in modeling liquid hydrogen release and dispersion in open environment , 2018 .

[27]  K. Bray,et al.  Studies of the turbulent burning velocity , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  A. Venetsanos,et al.  CFD benchmark on hydrogen release and dispersion in confined, naturally ventilated space with one vent , 2015 .

[29]  Vinod M. Janardhanan,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[30]  Prankul Middha,et al.  Using computational fluid dynamics as a tool for hydrogen safety studies , 2009 .

[31]  M. G. Dodson,et al.  The Structure and Concentration Decay of High Pressure Jets of Natural Gas , 1984 .

[32]  A. G. Venetsanos,et al.  Release and dispersion modeling of cryogenic under-expanded hydrogen jets , 2017 .

[33]  Ethan S. Hecht,et al.  HyRAM: A methodology and toolkit for quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen systems , 2017 .

[34]  M. Heitsch,et al.  HySafe standard benchmark Problem SBEP-V11: Predictions of hydrogen release and dispersion from a CGH2 bus in an underpass , 2010 .

[35]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  An intercomparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict distribution and mixing of H2 in a closed vessel , 2007 .

[36]  Thierry Poinsot,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Vented Deflagration , 2013 .

[37]  J. Hall,et al.  Hydrogen jet fires in a passively ventilated enclosure , 2017 .

[38]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Handbook of fuel cells : fundamentals technology and applications , 2003 .

[39]  Murat Gökçek,et al.  Optimal design of a Hydrogen Refuelling Station (HRFS) powered by Hybrid Power System , 2018 .

[40]  B. Cariteau,et al.  Experimental study of the effects of vent geometry on the dispersion of a buoyant gas in a small enclosure , 2013 .

[41]  Shilei Shen,et al.  Influence of built-in obstacles on unconfined vapor cloud explosion , 2016 .

[42]  E. Studer,et al.  Hydrogen related risks within a private garage: Concentration measurements in a realistic full scale experimental facility , 2009 .

[43]  B. Hjertager,et al.  On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion , 1977 .

[44]  G. Charalambopoulou,et al.  Microscale characterisation of stochastically reconstructed carbon fiber-based Gas Diffusion Layers; effects of anisotropy and resin content , 2016 .

[45]  M. Heitsch,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage , 2009 .

[46]  J. E. Chirivella,et al.  Experimental and analytical analyses of the mechanisms governing the dispersion of flammable clouds formed by liquid hydrogen spills , 1984 .

[47]  A. Kotchourko,et al.  Hydrogen deflagration simulations under typical containment conditions for nuclear safety , 2012 .

[48]  G. Charalambopoulou,et al.  Thermal coupling potential of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells with metal hydride tanks: Thermodynamic and design considerations towards integrated systems , 2014 .

[49]  Yuanliang Liu,et al.  CFD modeling and analysis of the influence factors of liquid hydrogen spills in open environment , 2017 .

[50]  M. Mench,et al.  Direct measurement of through-plane thermal conductivity and contact resistance in fuel cell materials , 2006 .

[51]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  CFD evaluation against a large scale unconfined hydrogen deflagration , 2017 .

[52]  V. Molkov,et al.  Hydrogen–air deflagrations: Vent sizing correlation for low-strength equipment and buildings , 2015 .

[53]  E. Ivers-Tiffée,et al.  Materials and concepts for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) in stationary and mobile applications , 2004 .

[54]  M. Heitsch,et al.  An intercomparison of CFD models to predict lean and non-uniform hydrogen mixture explosions , 2010 .

[55]  A. Beccantini,et al.  An intercomparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to reproduce a large-scale hydrogen deflagration in open atmosphere , 2010 .

[56]  B. Shi,et al.  Discrete lattice effects on the forcing term in the lattice Boltzmann method. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[57]  G. Charalambopoulou,et al.  A generic physical model for a thermally integrated high-temperature PEM fuel cell and sodium alanate tank system , 2015 .

[58]  J. R. Travis,et al.  Hydrogen release from a high pressure gaseous hydrogen reservoir in case of a small leak , 2011 .

[59]  A G Venetsanos,et al.  Analysis of data from spilling experiments performed with liquid hydrogen. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[60]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Comparison of the explosion characteristics of hydrogen, propane, and methane clouds at the stoichiometric concentrations , 2017 .

[61]  D. Schmidt,et al.  Numerical simulation of hydrogen gas releases between buildings , 1999 .

[62]  A. D. Birch,et al.  Velocity Decay of High Pressure Jets , 1987 .

[63]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  Numerical simulations of vented hydrogen deflagrations in a medium-scale enclosure , 2017 .

[64]  M. Heitsch,et al.  HySafe SBEP-V20: Numerical studies of release experiments inside a naturally ventilated residential garage , 2010 .

[65]  A. G. Venetsanos,et al.  Evaluation of notional nozzle approaches for CFD simulations of free-shear under-expanded hydrogen jets , 2012 .

[66]  James D. Colton,et al.  Large-scale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations , 2007 .

[67]  S. Gubba Development of a dynamic LES model for premixed turbulent flames , 2009 .

[68]  A. Venetsanos,et al.  Hydrogen permeation from CGH2 vehicles in garages: CFD dispersion calculations and experimental validation , 2010 .

[69]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  Development of a model evaluation protocol for CFD analysis of hydrogen safety issues the SUSANA project , 2017 .

[70]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems , 2010 .

[71]  J. G. Bartzis,et al.  The ADREA-HF CFD code for consequence assessment of hydrogen applications , 2010 .

[72]  Mathieu Ichard,et al.  Validation of CFD modelling of LH2 spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments , 2011 .

[73]  William G. Houf,et al.  Analytical and experimental investigation of small-scale unintended releases of hydrogen , 2008 .

[74]  M. Fowler,et al.  In-plane and through-plane gas permeability of carbon fiber electrode backing layers , 2006 .

[75]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  Rayleigh-Taylor instability: Modelling and effect on coherent deflagrations , 2014 .

[76]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  Large eddy simulation of hydrogen–air premixed flames in a small scale combustion chamber , 2015 .

[77]  B. Cariteau,et al.  Experimental study of the concentration build-up regimes in an enclosure without ventilation , 2012 .

[78]  柯道友 COMPARISON OF TWO-LAYER MODEL FOR HIGH PRESSURE HYDROGEN JETS WITH NOTIONAL NOZZLE MODEL PREDICTIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 2015 .

[79]  A. Venetsanos,et al.  Mitigation of buoyant gas releases in single-vented enclosure exposed to wind: Removing the disrupting wind effect , 2016 .

[80]  S. Dorofeev,et al.  An analysis of peak overpressures in vented gaseous explosions , 2011 .

[81]  Evripidis Lois,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of RES & hydrogen technologies integration in remote island power system , 2013 .

[82]  Andreas Wiegmann,et al.  Design of acoustic trim based on geometric modeling and flow simulation for non-woven , 2006 .

[83]  C. D. Barley,et al.  Buoyancy-driven ventilation of hydrogen from buildings: Laboratory test and model validation☆ , 2009 .

[84]  Bjørn H. Hjertager Simulation of gas explosions , 1989 .