Effects of Sulfate Reduction on Trichloroethene Dechlorination by Dehalococcoides-Containing Microbial Communities

ABSTRACT In order to elucidate interactions between sulfate reduction and dechlorination, we systematically evaluated the effects of different concentrations of sulfate and sulfide on reductive dechlorination by isolates, constructed consortia, and enrichments containing Dehalococcoides sp. Sulfate (up to 5 mM) did not inhibit the growth or metabolism of pure cultures of the dechlorinator Dehalococcoides mccartyi 195, the sulfate reducer Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough, or the syntroph Syntrophomonas wolfei. In contrast, sulfide at 5 mM exhibited inhibitory effects on growth of the sulfate reducer and the syntroph, as well as on both dechlorination and growth rates of D. mccartyi. Transcriptomic analysis of D. mccartyi 195 revealed that genes encoding ATP synthase, biosynthesis, and Hym hydrogenase were downregulated during sulfide inhibition, whereas genes encoding metal-containing enzymes involved in energy metabolism were upregulated even though the activity of those enzymes (hydrogenases) was inhibited. When the electron acceptor (trichloroethene) was limiting and an electron donor (lactate) was provided in excess to cocultures and enrichments, high sulfate concentrations (5 mM) inhibited reductive dechlorination due to the toxicity of generated sulfide. The initial cell ratio of sulfate reducers to D. mccartyi (1:3, 1:1, or 3:1) did not affect the dechlorination performance in the presence of sulfate (2 and 5 mM). In contrast, under electron donor limitation, dechlorination was not affected by sulfate amendments due to low sulfide production, demonstrating that D. mccartyi can function effectively in anaerobic microbial communities containing moderate sulfate concentrations (5 mM), likely due to its ability to outcompete other hydrogen-consuming bacteria and archaea. IMPORTANCE Sulfate is common in subsurface environments and has been reported as a cocontaminant with chlorinated solvents at various concentrations. Inconsistent results for the effects of sulfate inhibition on the performance of dechlorination enrichment cultures have been reported in the literature. These inconsistent findings make it difficult to understand potential mechanisms of sulfate inhibition and complicate the interpretation of bioremediation field data. In order to elucidate interactions between sulfate reduction and reductive dechlorination, this study systematically evaluated the effects of different concentrations of sulfate and sulfide on reductive dechlorination by isolates, constructed consortia, and enrichments containing Dehalococcoides sp. This study provides a more fundamental understanding of the competition mechanisms between reductive dechlorination by Dehalococcoides mccartyi and sulfate reduction during the bioremediation process. It also provides insights on the significance of sulfate concentrations on reductive dechlorination under electron donor/acceptor-limiting conditions during in situ bioremediation applications. For example, at a trichloroethene-contaminated site with a high sulfate concentration, proper slow-releasing electron donors can be selected to generate an electron donor-limiting environment that favors reductive dechlorination and minimizes the sulfide inhibition effect.

[1]  J. Gossett,et al.  Reductive Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethene to Ethene by a Two-Component Enzyme Pathway , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  D. A. Barry,et al.  Biological reduction of chlorinated solvents: Batch-scale geochemical modeling , 2010 .

[3]  P. Bradley,et al.  Biodegradation of Chlorinated Ethenes , 2010 .

[4]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  An Internal Reference Technique for Accurately Quantifying Specific mRNAs by Real-Time PCR with Application to the tceA Reductive Dehalogenase Gene , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  Lisa Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Bioleaching of rare earth elements from monazite sand , 2016, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Jeff J. Morse,et al.  A Treatability Test for Evaluating the Potential Applicability of the Reductive Anaerobic Biological In Situ Treatment Technology (RABITT) to Remediate Chloroethenes , 1998 .

[7]  S. Joye,et al.  Influence of Sulfide Inhibition of Nitrification on Nitrogen Regeneration in Sediments , 1995, Science.

[8]  Rakesh Govind,et al.  Inhibition of sulfate‐reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage , 2002, Environmental toxicology.

[9]  M. Brusseau,et al.  Sulfate reduction in groundwater: characterization and applications for remediation , 2012, Environmental Geochemistry and Health.

[10]  P. Gerin,et al.  Influence of electron donors and acceptors on the bioremediation of soil contaminated with trichloroethene and nickel: laboratory- and pilot-scale study. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Sustainable syntrophic growth of Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 with Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough and Methanobacterium congolense: global transcriptomic and proteomic analyses , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[12]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Reductive Dehalogenase Gene Expression as a Biomarker for Physiological Activity of Dehalococcoides spp , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Zhen Zhou,et al.  Inhibitory effects of sulfide on nitrifying biomass in the anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic wastewater treatment process , 2014 .

[14]  D. Lovley,et al.  Hydrogen concentrations as an indicator of the predominant terminal electron-accepting reactions in aquatic sediments , 1988 .

[15]  C. H. Ward,et al.  In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes , 2010 .

[16]  J. Pandey,et al.  Integrative approaches for assessing the ecological sustainability of in situ bioremediation. , 2009, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[17]  R. J. Buchanan,et al.  New perspectives on microbial dehalogenation of chlorinated solvents: insights from the field. , 1998, Annual review of microbiology.

[18]  K. M. Ritalahti,et al.  Isolation and characterization of Dehalococcoides sp. strain FL2, a trichloroethene (TCE)- and 1,2-dichloroethene-respiring anaerobe. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[19]  B. Ahring,et al.  Kinetics of Sulfate and Hydrogen Uptake by the Thermophilic Sulfate-Reducing BacteriaThermodesulfobacterium sp. Strain JSP andThermodesulfovibrio sp. Strain R1Ha3 , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  Alison M. Cupples,et al.  Growth of a Dehalococcoides-Like Microorganism on Vinyl Chloride and cis-Dichloroethene as Electron Acceptors as Determined by Competitive PCR , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  Joel D. Cline,et al.  SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN NATURAL WATERS1 , 1969 .

[22]  J. Audic,et al.  Sulfide and sulfate inhibition of methanogenesis , 1987 .

[23]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Predominance of Dehalococcoides in the presence of different sulfate concentrations , 2013, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[24]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Versatility in Corrinoid Salvaging and Remodeling Pathways Supports Corrinoid-Dependent Metabolism in Dehalococcoides mccartyi , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Comparative genomics of two newly isolated Dehalococcoides strains and an enrichment using a genus microarray , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[26]  J. Gossett,et al.  Tetrachloroethene transformation to trichloroethene and cis-1,2-dichloroethene by sulfate-reducing enrichment cultures , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[27]  M. Reinhard,et al.  Complete Biological Dehalogenation of Chlorinated Ethylenes in Sulfate Containing Groundwater , 2004, Biodegradation.

[28]  M. McInerney,et al.  Growth of Syntrophomonas wolfei in pure culture on crotonate , 1987, Archives of Microbiology.

[29]  Peter Bayer,et al.  Removal of Volatile Organic Compounds in Vertical Flow Filters: Predictions from Reactive Transport Modeling , 2012 .

[30]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Metagenomic analysis of a stable trichloroethene-degrading microbial community , 2012, The ISME Journal.

[31]  M. Pantazidou,et al.  Chloroethene Biotransformation in the Presence of Different Sulfate Concentrations , 2012 .

[32]  J. Almeida,et al.  Effect of hydrogen sulfide on growth of sulfate reducing bacteria , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[33]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Influence of Vitamin B12 and Cocultures on the Growth of Dehalococcoides Isolates in Defined Medium , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  K. Hayes,et al.  Abiotic reductive dechlorination of cis-DCE by ferrous monosulfide mackinawite , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[35]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Relevance of side reactions in anaerobic reductive dechlorination microcosms amended with different electron donors. , 2007, Water research.

[36]  R. Hozalski,et al.  Evaluation of polyethylene hollow-fiber membranes for hydrogen delivery to support reductive dechlorination in a soil column. , 2003, Water research.

[37]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Enhanced anaerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents: environmental factors influencing microbial activity and their relevance under field conditions , 2006 .

[38]  Yanru Yang,et al.  Simulated and experimental evaluation of factors affecting the rate and extent of reductive dehalogenation of chloroethenes with glucose. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[39]  W. G. Characklis,et al.  Sulfide product inhibition of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans in batch and continuous cultures , 1995 .

[40]  S. Zinder,et al.  Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Ethenes and 1,2-Dichloroethane by “Dehalococcoides ethenogenes” 195 , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[41]  L. Rohlin,et al.  The genome of Syntrophomonas wolfei: new insights into syntrophic metabolism and biohydrogen production. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[42]  T. Chakrabarti,et al.  Biodegradation of Chlorinated Compounds—A Review , 2007 .

[43]  S. Roth,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Hydrogen Sulfide Toxicity , 2006, Drug metabolism reviews.

[44]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of TCE-dechlorinating consortia enriched on a variety of electron donors. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  John T. Wilson,et al.  Review of Abiotic Degradation of Chlorinated Solvents by Reactive Iron Minerals in Aquifers , 2015 .

[46]  O. Drzyzga,et al.  Coexistence of a sulphate-reducing Desulfovibrio species and the dehalorespiring Desulfitobacterium frappieri TCE1 in defined chemostat cultures grown with various combinations of sulfate and tetrachloroethene. , 2001, Environmental microbiology.

[47]  F. Fava,et al.  Microbial dehalogenation of organohalides in marine and estuarine environments. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[48]  Seungho Yu,et al.  Comparison of trichloroethylene reductive dehalogenation by microbial communities stimulated on silicon-based organic compounds as slow-release anaerobic substrates. , 2002, Water research.

[49]  A. Samhan-Arias,et al.  Hydrogen sulfide is a reversible inhibitor of the NADH oxidase activity of synaptic plasma membranes. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[50]  R. Jakobsen,et al.  Effects of sulfate on anaerobic chloroethene degradation by an enriched culture under transient and steady-state hydrogen supply. , 2005, Water research.

[51]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[52]  N. A. F R E E B O R N,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of TCE-Dechlorinating Consortia Enriched on a Variety of Electron Donors , 2022 .

[53]  A. Spormann,et al.  Effects of sulfate reduction on the bacterial community and kinetic parameters of a dechlorinating culture under chemostat growth conditions. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[54]  E. A. Greene,et al.  Gene expression analysis of the mechanism of inhibition of Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough by nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[55]  M. Rivett,et al.  Heterogeneous hyporheic zone dechlorination of a TCE groundwater plume discharging to an urban river reach. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[56]  A. Pérez-de-Mora,et al.  Bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes in fractured bedrock and associated changes in dechlorinating and nondechlorinating microbial populations. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[57]  S. Atashgahi,et al.  Geochemical and microbial community determinants of reductive dechlorination at a site biostimulated with glycerol , 2017, Environmental microbiology.

[58]  F. Aulenta,et al.  Competition for H2 between sulfate reduction and dechlorination in butyrate-fed anaerobic cultures , 2008 .

[59]  W. J. Jones,et al.  Hydrogen concentrations in sulfate-reducing estuarine sediments during PCE dehalogenation. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[60]  Guang-feng Yang,et al.  The effect of sulfide inhibition on the ANAMMOX process. , 2012, Water research.

[61]  K. A. West,et al.  Global Gene Expression of Dehalococcoides within a Robust Dynamic Tce-dechlorinating Community under Conditions of Periodic Substrate Supply , 2022 .

[62]  L. Alvarez-Cohen,et al.  Efficient Metabolic Exchange and Electron Transfer within a Syntrophic Trichloroethene-Degrading Coculture of Dehalococcoides mccartyi 195 and Syntrophomonas wolfei , 2015, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[63]  D. Fennell,et al.  Microcosms for Site-Specific Evaluation of Enhanced Biological Reductive Dehalogenation , 2004 .

[64]  P. Squillace,et al.  Chlorinated solvents in groundwater of the United States. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Competition for Hydrogen within a Chlorinated Solvent Dehalogenating Anaerobic Mixed Culture , 1998 .