Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: Validation and applications

Abstract Identified modal characteristics are often used as a basis for the calibration and validation of dynamic structural models, for structural control, for structural health monitoring, etc. It is therefore important to know their accuracy. In this article, a method for estimating the (co)variance of modal characteristics that are identified with the stochastic subspace identification method is validated for two civil engineering structures. The first structure is a damaged prestressed concrete bridge for which acceleration and dynamic strain data were measured in 36 different setups. The second structure is a mid-rise building for which acceleration data were measured in 10 different setups. There is a good quantitative agreement between the predicted levels of uncertainty and the observed variability of the eigenfrequencies and damping ratios between the different setups. The method can therefore be used with confidence for quantifying the uncertainty of the identified modal characteristics, also when some or all of them are estimated from a single batch of vibration data. Furthermore, the method is seen to yield valuable insight in the variability of the estimation accuracy from mode to mode and from setup to setup: the more informative a setup is regarding an estimated modal characteristic, the smaller is the estimated variance.

[1]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Box-Jenkins identification revisited - Part III: Multivariable systems , 2007, Autom..

[2]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Fully automated (operational) modal analysis , 2012 .

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[4]  H. Zeiger,et al.  Approximate linear realizations of given dimension via Ho's algorithm , 1974 .

[5]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty calculation in (operational) modal analysis , 2007 .

[6]  E. Jaynes.  Probability theory : the logic of science , 2003 .

[7]  Thomas G. Carne,et al.  The inception of OMA in the development of modal testing technology for wind turbines , 2010 .

[8]  R. Pintelon,et al.  Fast calculation of confidence intervals on parameter estimates of least-squares frequency-domain estimators , 2009 .

[9]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge , 2011 .

[10]  Edwin Thompson Jaynes,et al.  Probability theory , 2003 .

[11]  R. Pintelon.  System identification , 2001 .

[12]  Akira Mita,et al.  Challenges in developing confidence intervals on modal parameters estimated for large civil infrastructure with stochastic subspace identification , 2009 .

[13]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Brief paper: Box-Jenkins identification revisited-Part III , 2007 .

[14]  Patrick Guillaume,et al.  Maximum likelihood identification of modal parameters from operational data , 1999 .

[15]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes , 1991 .

[16]  S. Au.  Fast Bayesian ambient modal identification in the frequency domain, Part I: Posterior most probable value , 2012 .

[17]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Efficient Multi-Order Uncertainty Computation for Stochastic Subspace Identification , 2013 .

[18]  Geert Degrande,et al.  Finite element modelling of a silo based on experimental modal analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Comparing the CCA Subspace Method to Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods in the case of No Exogenous Inputs , 2005 .

[20]  Thomas G. Carne,et al.  The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines , 1993 .

[21]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis , 2006 .

[22]  Richard S. Pappa,et al.  A consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm , 1992 .

[23]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[24]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification , 2014 .

[25]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[26]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[27]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[28]  K. Arun,et al.  Balanced approximation of stochastic systems , 1990 .

[29]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .

[30]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge , 2009 .

[31]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[32]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for modal parameters from stochastic subspace identification on multi-setup measurements ☆ , 2013 .

[33]  P. G. Bakir,et al.  Damage identification on the Tilff bridge by vibration monitoring using optical fiber strain sensors , 2005 .

[34]  Sun-Yuan Kung,et al.  A new identification and model reduction algorithm via singular value decomposition , 1978 .