Contingency in everyday surgical work

This paper concerns a qualitative study exploring the nature of surgical work with a group of 34 surgeons involved in treating urinary incontinence. Sources of surgical variation are identified from surgeons' own accounts of their work as well as observation of the selection of patients and operative procedures, and the operative process itself. A typology of contingency, consisting of three categories of contingency (case, surgeon and external), was found in this area of everyday surgical work. In developing this typology, theoretical and philosophical ideas about habitus and disposition, and practical and technical knowledge, are considered and extended to help to understand the nature of surgical practice. These ideas may also be useful in explaining some of the apparent tensions between evidence-based surgery and everyday surgical work.

[1]  M. Michell,et al.  Variation in management of small invasive breast cancers detected on screening in the former South East Thames region: observational study , 1997, BMJ.

[2]  M. Bloor.  Bishop Berkeley and the Adenotonsillectomy Enigma: An Exploration of Variation in the Social Construction of Medical Disposals , 1976 .

[3]  P. McCulloch,et al.  Surgical practice is evidence based , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  Catherine Johnson Pettinari,et al.  Task, Talk and Text in the Operating Room: A Study in Medical Discourse , 1988 .

[5]  R. Jeffery,et al.  Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments. , 1979, Sociology of health & illness.

[6]  E Ferlie,et al.  Achieving clinical behaviour change: a case of becoming indeterminate. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Joan Cassell,et al.  Expected Miracles: Surgeons at Work , 1991 .

[8]  David Silverman,et al.  The child as a social object: Down's Syndrome children in a paediatric cardiology clinic , 1981 .

[9]  R. Cookson.  Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of Labour full guidance published by the RCOG. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, London , 2001 .

[10]  G. Bowker,et al.  The multiple bodies of the medical record : Toward a sociology of an artifact , 1996 .

[11]  B. Barnes,et al.  Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[12]  D. Armstrong.  Clinical sense and clinical science. , 1977, Social science & medicine.

[13]  N. Black,et al.  Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study , 1997, BMJ.

[14]  G. Teasdale.  Learning from Bristol: report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995 , 2002, British journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  John Scott,et al.  Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? , 1996 .

[16]  David Silverman,et al.  Communication and Medical Practice: Social Relations in the Clinic , 1988 .

[17]  M. Enkin,et al.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  T. Parsons.  The Social System , 1953 .

[19]  K Knafl,et al.  Professional socialization in a surgical specialty: Acquiring medical judgment. , 1975, Social science & medicine.

[20]  M. Millman,et al.  The Unkindest Cut: Life in the Backrooms of Medicine , 1978 .

[21]  "When you wake up it'll all be over": Communication in the anaesthetic room , 1999 .

[22]  Barry Smith,et al.  Practical Knowledge: Outlines of a Theory of Traditions and Skills , 1988 .

[23]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  The clinical experience: The construction and reconstruction of medical reality , 1997 .

[24]  W. Hardin,et al.  Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery. , 1999, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[25]  Pearl Katz,et al.  Ritual in the Operating Room , 1981 .

[26]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Power, Rule and Domination : A Critical and Empirical Understanding of Power in Sociological Theory and Organizational Life , 1975 .

[27]  K. McPherson,et al.  Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America. , 1981, Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology.

[28]  Stefan Hirschauer,et al.  The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery , 1991 .

[29]  N. Black,et al.  What Determines the Choice of Procedure in Stress Incontinence Surgery?: The Use of Multilevel Modeling , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[30]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[31]  P. Bourdieu.  The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[32]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[33]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  A. Bisset,et al.  Grommets, tonsillectomies, and deprivation in Scotland , 1994, BMJ.

[36]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Knowing and being : essays , 1969 .

[37]  K. Flegel,et al.  The ceremonial order of the clinic: by P.M. Strong. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1979. 267 pp. $25.00 , 1982 .

[38]  A. Dundes,et al.  The Gomer: A Figure of American Hospital Folk Speech , 1978 .

[39]  P. Clifford,et al.  Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  K. Cox,et al.  The social meaning of surgery , 1993 .