Design of a Novel Low Cost Point of Care Tampon (POCkeT) Colposcope for Use in Resource Limited Settings

Introduction Current guidelines by WHO for cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries involves visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) of the cervix, followed by treatment during the same visit or a subsequent visit with cryotherapy if a suspicious lesion is found. Implementation of these guidelines is hampered by a lack of: trained health workers, reliable technology, and access to screening facilities. A low cost ultra-portable Point of Care Tampon based digital colposcope (POCkeT Colposcope) for use at the community level setting, which has the unique form factor of a tampon, can be inserted into the vagina to capture images of the cervix, which are on par with that of a state of the art colposcope, at a fraction of the cost. A repository of images to be compiled that can be used to empower front line workers to become more effective through virtual dynamic training. By task shifting to the community setting, this technology could potentially provide significantly greater cervical screening access to where the most vulnerable women live. The POCkeT Colposcope’s concentric LED ring provides comparable white and green field illumination at a fraction of the electrical power required in commercial colposcopes. Evaluation with standard optical imaging targets to assess the POCkeT Colposcope against the state of the art digital colposcope and other VIAM technologies. Results Our POCkeT Colposcope has comparable resolving power, color reproduction accuracy, minimal lens distortion, and illumination when compared to commercially available colposcopes. In vitro and pilot in vivo imaging results are promising with our POCkeT Colposcope capturing comparable quality images to commercial systems. Conclusion The POCkeT Colposcope is capable of capturing images suitable for cervical lesion analysis. Our portable low cost system could potentially increase access to cervical cancer screening in limited resource settings through task shifting to community health workers.

[1]  Eran A. Edirisinghe,et al.  A novel colour management system for image signal processors in commercial digital cameras , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[2]  Ahmed Awad E. Ahmed,et al.  A novel multiwavelength fluorescence image-guided surgery imaging system , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[3]  Malin Thorsell,et al.  Evaluation of Stationary Colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede Score Systematic Colposcopic System in VIA Positive Women , 2014, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[4]  Quanzeng Wang,et al.  Towards standardized assessment of endoscope optical performance: geometric distortion , 2013, Other Conferences.

[5]  Daniel Altman,et al.  Agreement of Colposcope and Gynocular in Assessment of Cervical Lesions by Swede Score: A Randomized, Crossover Pilot Trial , 2013, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[6]  B. Varghese,et al.  Advancing cervical cancer prevention in India: implementation science priorities. , 2013, The oncologist.

[7]  A. Palloni,et al.  Older adults under a mixed regime of infectious and chronic diseases. , 2012, Salud publica de Mexico.

[8]  Roy Zhang,et al.  Performance of p16/Ki-67 Immunostaining to Detect Cervical Cancer Precursors in a Colposcopy Referral Population , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  M. Schiffman,et al.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Exploratory Dijkstra forest based automatic vessel segmentation: applications in video indirect ophthalmoscopy (VIO) , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[11]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: Three public policy implications , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[12]  M Arbyn,et al.  Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  H. Cronjé Cervical screening strategies in resourced and resource-constrained countries. , 2011, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[14]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Enhanced video indirect ophthalmoscopy (VIO) via robust mosaicing , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[15]  Othmane El Meslouhi,et al.  Automatic detection and inpainting of specular reflections for colposcopic images , 2011, Central European Journal of Computer Science.

[16]  Abhishek Das,et al.  Elimination of specular reflection and identification of ROI: The first step in automated detection of Cervical Cancer using Digital Colposcopy , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques.

[17]  S. Batra,et al.  Can visual inspection with acetic acid under magnification substitute colposcopy in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in low-resource settings? , 2011, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  B. Strander,et al.  The Swede Score: Evaluation of a Scoring System Designed to Improve the Predictive Value of Colposcopy , 2010, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[19]  D. O'connor A tissue basis for colposcopic findings. , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[20]  Corrine M. Williams,et al.  Sexual violence at first intercourse against women in Moshi, northern Tanzania: Prevalence, risk factors, and consequences , 2008, Population studies.

[21]  Is magnification necessary to confirm visual inspection of cervical abnormalities? A randomized trial in Peru. , 2008, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[22]  Sun Young Park,et al.  Methodology of a real-time quality control for the multispectral digital colposcope (MDC). , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  Jose Jeronimo,et al.  Comparative performance analysis of cervix ROI extraction and specular reflection removal algorithms for uterine cervix image analysis , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  Ulf Gustafsson,et al.  A new image calibration system in digital colposcopy. , 2006, Optics express.

[25]  P. Sodhani,et al.  Test characteristics of various screening modalities for cervical cancer: a feasibility study to develop an alternative strategy for resource‐limited settings , 2006, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[26]  Wenjing Li,et al.  Detection and Characterization of Abnormal Vascular Patterns in Automated Cervical Image Analysis , 2006, ISVC.

[27]  C. Watts,et al.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence , 2006, The Lancet.

[28]  Hayit Greenspan,et al.  Automatic detection of specular reflections in uterine cervix images , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  Norman Koren,et al.  The Imatest program: comparing cameras with different amounts of sharpening , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  Yanxi Liu,et al.  Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications, First International Workshop, CVBIA 2005, Beijing, China, October 21, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, CVBIA.

[31]  Jia Gu,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) for Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A New System Design in Medical Image Processing , 2005, CVBIA.

[32]  C. Skinner,et al.  Pain predicts non-adherence to pap smear screening among middle-aged African American women. , 2005, Preventive medicine.

[33]  Wencheng Wu,et al.  The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations , 2005 .

[34]  M. Hernández-Ávila,et al.  Detección y seguimiento con inspección visual del cérvix para la prevención del cáncer cervicouterino en las zonas rurales de México , 2005 .

[35]  M. Hernández-Ávila,et al.  [Screening and follow-up for cervical cancer prevention in rural Mexico using visual inspection]. , 2005, Salud publica de Mexico.

[36]  J. Sellors,et al.  Illumination, optics, and clinical performance of a hand‐held magnified visual inspection device (AviScope™): a comparison with colposcopy , 2004, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[37]  Marcus H. Henderson,et al.  Portable colposcopy in low‐resource settings , 2004, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[38]  C. Mauck,et al.  A comparison of techniques to assess cervicovaginal irritation and evaluation of the variability between two observers. , 2004, Contraception.

[39]  Eric Lucas,et al.  Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia: Results from an IARC multicentre study in India and Africa , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[40]  Masahiro Yamaguchi,et al.  Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[41]  William R. Caspary Not So Bad After All , 2004 .

[42]  J. Sellors,et al.  Confirmation of cervical neoplasia using a hand‐held, lighted magnification device , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[43]  S. Emans,et al.  Predictors of Papanicolaou Smear Return in a Hospital‐Based Adolescent and Young Adult Clinic , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  M. Winkleby,et al.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening in rural Mexico , 2002, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[45]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Globocan 2000 : cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide , 2001 .

[46]  L. Satyanarayana,et al.  Low-cost technology for screening uterine cervical cancer. , 2000, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[47]  P. Kenemans,et al.  Digital color imaging colposcopy: a matter of choice. , 1998, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[48]  R. Richards-Kortum,et al.  Safety Analysis: Relative Risks of Ultraviolet Exposure from Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Colposcopy Are Comparable* , 1997, Photochemistry and Photobiology.

[49]  K. Malterud,et al.  Not so bad after all..., Women's experiences of pelvic examinations. , 1997, Family practice.

[50]  American society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. , 1997, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[51]  D. Ferris,et al.  Colpophotography systems: a review. , 1991, The Journal of family practice.

[52]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Absorption spectra of human fetal and adult oxyhemoglobin, de-oxyhemoglobin, carboxyhemoglobin, and methemoglobin. , 1991, Clinical chemistry.

[53]  D. Ferris,et al.  Colposcopes: a critical review. , 1991, The Journal of family practice.

[54]  R Reid,et al.  Genital warts and cervical cancer. V. The tissue basis of colposcopic change. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.