How to Support Athlete Autonomy in University Sports: Coaches’ Experience of the reROOT Program

The purpose of this study was to evaluate coaches’ experience of the reROOT program, a program aiming to increase coaches’ autonomy-supportive skills, structure, and involvement. We delivered the program to 32 university sports coaches, and of these coaches, 13 participated in three semistructured focus groups 2 weeks postprogram and discussed their experience of the program. Guiding questions aimed at assessing participants’ responsiveness to the program and its perceived usefulness. Classical content analyses were performed and organized based on the guiding questions when applicable. Results suggest that coaches appreciated the program, believed that they could implement its skills in their day-to-day coaching, and observed positive impacts on themselves and their athletes despite the COVID-19 pandemic. It thus appears that coaches are responsive to the reROOT program and that it could be a useful part of their training.

[1]  W. Grolnick,et al.  Parental consideration of children's experiences: A critical review of parenting constructs , 2022, Journal of Family Theory & Review.

[2]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  How-to parenting program: A randomized controlled trial evaluating its impact on parenting , 2022, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.

[3]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  Autonomy support in sport contexts: The role of parents and coaches in the promotion of athlete well-being and performance. , 2022, Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology.

[4]  Michael Jones,et al.  Motivating workers: how leaders apply self-determination theory in organizations , 2020, Organization Management Journal.

[5]  Jody L. Langdon,et al.  Examination of Novice Coaches’ Previous Experience as Athletes: Examples of Autonomy Support and Controlling Behaviors as Influences on Future Coaching Practice , 2020 .

[6]  G. Kerr,et al.  Investigating the Barriers and Facilitators to Achieving Coaching Certification , 2020 .

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health , 2020, Health psychology review.

[8]  M. Vansteenkiste,et al.  Coaching the coach: Intervention effects on need-supportive coaching behavior and athlete motivation and engagement , 2019, Psychology of Sport and Exercise.

[9]  J. Fontaine,et al.  Adopting a helicopter‐perspective towards motivating and demotivating coaching: A circumplex approach , 2019, Psychology of Sport and Exercise.

[10]  E. Kristiansen,et al.  Guidelines for Need-Supportive Coach Development: The Motivation Activation Program in Sports (MAPS) , 2019, International Sport Coaching Journal.

[11]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Process Evaluation for Stressor Reduction Interventions in Sport , 2018, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology.

[12]  L. Pelletier,et al.  The Antecedents of Coaches' Interpersonal Behaviors: The Role of the Coaching Context, Coaches' Psychological Needs, and Coaches' Motivation. , 2017, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[13]  T. García-Calvo,et al.  Effects of an Interpersonal Style Intervention for Coaches on Young Soccer Players’ Motivational Processes , 2017, Journal of human kinetics.

[14]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Motivational processes in the coach‐athlete relationship: A multi‐cultural self‐determination approach , 2017 .

[15]  H. Gainforth,et al.  Describing and classifying coach development programmes: A synthesis of empirical research and applied practice , 2016 .

[16]  Bárbara Lorence,et al.  “Family Education and Support” program for families at psychosocial risk: The role of implementation process , 2016 .

[17]  Clifford J. Mallett,et al.  Implementing an Autonomy-Supportive Intervention to Develop Mental Toughness in Adolescent Rowers , 2016 .

[18]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  Predicting Sport Experience During Training: The Role of Change-Oriented Feedback in Athletes' Motivation, Self-Confidence and Needs Satisfaction Fluctuations. , 2016, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[19]  C. Lonsdale,et al.  Testing the Effects of a Self-Determination Theory-Based Intervention with Youth Gaelic Football Coaches on Athlete Motivation and Burnout , 2015 .

[20]  J. P. Pope,et al.  Testing a sequence of relationships from interpersonal coaching styles to rugby performance, guided by the coach–athlete motivation model , 2015 .

[21]  M. Kompier,et al.  Autonomy support and motivational responses across training and competition in individual and team sports , 2015 .

[22]  Youngsun Lee,et al.  Giving and receiving autonomy support in a high-stakes sport context: A field-based experiment during the 2012 London Paralympic Games☆ , 2015 .

[23]  J. Reeve,et al.  An Intervention-Based Program of Research on Teachers’ Motivating Styles , 2014 .

[24]  Joëlle Carpentier,et al.  When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport , 2013 .

[25]  J. Sproule,et al.  Coaches perceptions of their coach education experience , 2012 .

[26]  Nikos Ntoumanis,et al.  A review of controlling motivational strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: implications for sports coaches , 2009 .

[27]  J. Reeve,et al.  Training Corporate Managers to Adopt a More Autonomy-Supportive Motivating Style Toward Employees: An Intervention Study , 2009 .

[28]  Wade D. Gilbert,et al.  An Integrative Definition of Coaching Effectiveness and Expertise , 2009 .

[29]  J. Reeve.  Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive , 2009 .

[30]  Andrea J. Becker,et al.  It's Not What They Do, It's How They Do It: Athlete Experiences of Great Coaching , 2009 .

[31]  J. Durlak,et al.  Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[32]  Prudence Plummer-D'Amato,et al.  Focus group methodology Part 2: Considerations for analysis , 2008 .

[33]  D. Anderson-Butcher,et al.  Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory , 2007 .

[34]  R. Breen,et al.  A Practical Guide to Focus-Group Research , 2006 .

[35]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[36]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Autonomy Support and Need Satisfaction in the Motivation and Well-Being of Gymnasts , 2003 .

[37]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[38]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity , 1984 .

[39]  Geneviève A. Mageau,et al.  Effectiveness and acceptability beliefs regarding logical consequences and mild punishments , 2018 .

[40]  L. Pelletier,et al.  Pressure From Above and Pressure From Below as Determinants of Teachers ’ Motivation and Teaching Behaviors , 2002 .

[41]  R. Prinz,et al.  Promoting intervention fidelity. Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.