Optimal Cochlear Implant Insertion Vectors

Hypothesis: An optimal insertion trajectory during cochlear implantation may be determined from the anatomic relationship between the facial nerve and round window. Background: Cochlear implantation functional outcomes improve with insertion of the implant into the scala tympani. This depends on creating a cochleostomy in the proper position and inserting the electrode along a trajectory coaxial with the centerline of the scala tympani. The anatomic landmarks for this insertion trajectory have not been described. Methods: Clinical computed tomography and micro-computed tomographic analysis of 8 cadaveric temporal bones. Results: Appropriate insertion vectors pass inferior or anteroinferior to the round window membrane. In many individuals, the facial nerve interrupts all or most of the insertion vectors coaxial to the centerline of the scala tympani. Conclusion: A cochleostomy placed inferior or anteroinferior to the round window membrane may facilitate atraumatic insertion of a cochlear implant along the centerline of the scala tympani. The lateral and anterior wall of the fallopian canal must be adequately thinned to achieve an optimal insertion trajectory. This is particularly true when inserting through cochleostomies placed away from the round window along the basal turn of the cochlea.

[1]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma , 2006, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  John K Niparko,et al.  Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. , 2005, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  Raleigh F. Johnson,et al.  Virtual Endoscopic Evaluation of Labyrinthine Fistulae Resulting From Cholesteatoma , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[5]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Comparison of Round Window and Cochleostomy Approaches with a Prototype Hearing Preservation Electrode , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[6]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  D. Basta,et al.  Does the surgical approach in cochlear implantation influence the occurrence of postoperative vertigo? , 2008, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[8]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion™ and HiFocus II™ electrodes , 2005, Hearing Research.

[10]  P. Banfai,et al.  Projection of the spiral cochlear canal on the medial wall of the tympanic cavity with regard to the cochlear implant. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[11]  Margaret W. Skinner,et al.  Use of Computed Tomography Scans for Cochlear Implants , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Jörg Schipper,et al.  Evaluation des Insertionstraumas des Nucleus® Contour Advance™-Elektrodenträgers im humanen Felsenbeinmodell , 2004 .

[13]  P J Abbas,et al.  Multivariate Predictors of Audiological Success with Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 1993, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[14]  J. Tomblin,et al.  The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  C. Buchman,et al.  Scala Tympani Cochleostomy I: Results of a Survey , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Cochleostomy site: Implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  C. G. Wright,et al.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion: The Round Window Revisited , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Temporal Bone Results and Hearing Preservation with a New Straight Electrode , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[19]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  T. Kiratzidis.  'Veria operation': cochlear implantation without a mastoidectomy and a posterior tympanotomy. A new surgical technique. , 2000, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[21]  Andreas Radeloff,et al.  Scala Tympani Cochleostomy II: Topography and Histology , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[22]  Thomas Klenzner,et al.  Quality Control After Insertion of the Nucleus Contour and Contour Advance Electrode in Adults , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Haobing Wang,et al.  Anatomy of the Round Window and Hook Region of the Cochlea With Implications for Cochlear Implantation and Other Endocochlear Surgical Procedures , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[24]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour ™ electrodes , 2005, Hearing Research.

[25]  S. Berrettini,et al.  Preservation of residual hearing following cochlear implantation: comparison between three surgical techniques , 2007, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[26]  A Aschendorff,et al.  [Evaluation of the insertion-trauma of the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode-array in a human temporal bone model]. , 2004, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.

[27]  J. Brokx,et al.  Quality-of-Life Benefit from Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[28]  G M Clark,et al.  The biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant. , 1988, The American journal of otology.

[29]  E Lehnhardt,et al.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique]. , 1993, HNO.

[30]  Ann E Geers,et al.  Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  Colleen Psarros,et al.  Speech Recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS Speech Coding Strategies in Newly Implanted Adults , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[32]  William F. House,et al.  Electrode Insertion Trauma in Cochlear Implantation , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[33]  K. Green,et al.  Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults , 2007, Cochlear implants international.

[34]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Preservation of Basal Inner Ear Structures in Cochlear Implantation , 2005, ORL.