Abstract Multi-stage hydraulic fracturing is the key to the success of many shale gas and shale oil reservoirs. The main objective of hydraulic fracturing in shale is to create fracture networks with sufficient fracture conductivity. Due to the variation in shale mineralogical and mechanical properties, fracture conductivity damage mechanisms in shale formations are complex. Standard fracture conductivity measurement procedures developed for fractures with high proppant concentration had to be modified to measure the conductivity in fractures with low proppant concentration. Water-based fracturing fluids can interact with the clay minerals in shale and eventually impact shale fracture conductivity. All these challenges require more experimental studies to improve our understanding of realistic fracture conductivity in shale formations. The aims of this work were to design an experimental framework to measure fracture conductivity created by low concentration proppants and to investigate the mechanisms of conductivity damage by water. We first presented the laboratory procedures and experimental design that can accurately measure fracture conductivity of shale fractures at low concentrations of proppants. Then we measured the undamaged shale fracture conductivity by dry nitrogen. Water with similar flowback water compositions was injected to simulate the damage process followed by secondary gas flow to measure the recovered fracture conductivity after the water damage. This study shows that the developed laboratory procedures can be utilized to reproducibly measure shale fracture conductivity by both gas and liquid. The conductivity measurement of propped fractures by small size proppants at low concentrations requires strict control on gas flow bypassing the fracture both parallel and perpendicular to the fracture length direction. Shale fracture surface softening is identified as the dominant cause for the significant conductivity reduction after water flow.
[1]
Alfred Daniel Hill,et al.
Measurement of realistic fracture conductivity in the Barnett shale
,
2015
.
[2]
Kartic C. Khilar,et al.
WATER SENSITIVITY OF SANDSTONES.
,
1983
.
[3]
M. W. Conway,et al.
Multiphase Non-Darcy Flow in Proppant Packs
,
2009
.
[4]
Mike Mullen,et al.
Surface Area vs Conductivity Type Fracture Treatments in Shale Reservoirs
,
2011
.
[5]
Frank O. Jones,et al.
Influence of Chemical Composition of Water on Clay Blocking of Permeability
,
1964
.
[6]
P. Reilly,et al.
An Examination of Clay Stabilization and Flow Stability in Various North American Gas Shales
,
2011
.
[7]
L. L. Handy,et al.
Release and Deposition of Clays in Sandstones
,
1985
.
[8]
R. E. Collins,et al.
Entrainment and Deposition of Fine Particles in Porous Media
,
1982
.
[9]
M. Prasad,et al.
The Effects of Fracturing Fluids on Shale Rock Mechanical Properties and Proppant Embedment
,
2011
.
[10]
Alfred Daniel Hill,et al.
Laboratory Measurement of Hydraulic Fracture Conductivities in the Barnett Shale
,
2013
.
[11]
Mukul M. Sharma,et al.
PERMEABILITY IMPAIRMENT DUE TO FINES MIGRATION IN SANDSTONES.
,
1986
.
[12]
P. Horner,et al.
Shale Gas Water Treatment Value Chain - A Review of Technologies, including Case Studies
,
2011
.