Dynamic Effects in Hopkinson Bar Four-Point Bend Fracture

Hopkinson bar techniques have played an important role in the study of high-rate deformation and fracture behavior of materials. In the current work, a split Hopkinson pressure bar was developed for dynamic four-point bend fracture testing, referred to as a “two-bar (incident and transmitted bars)/four-point” (2-bar/4-pt) bend test. To further understand some fundamental issues regarding stress wave propagation in this 2-bar/4-pt bend testing system, dynamic fracture tests were performed in pulse-shaped and unshaped pulse testing conditions. The effect of the pulse shaper on the incident pulse characteristics (rise time and duration), specimen’s dynamic response (load and loading point displacement), crack initiation time and stress-state equilibrium were investigated experimentally in the current work. The present results show that stress state equilibrium can be achieved prior to fracture initiation in notched and precracked specimens. In the pulse-shaped bending test, the specimen is more likely to attain stress-state equilibrium than in an unshaped incident pulse test. The crack initiation time was extended and the time required for attaining stress equilibrium was reduced by pulse shaping due to the tailored incident pulse having a longer rise time, which ensures that stress equilibrium is achieved prior to crack initiation.

[1]  D. Hui,et al.  Dynamic mode II delamination fracture of unidirectional graphite/epoxy composites , 2003 .

[2]  Per-Arne Lindqvist,et al.  Effects of loading rate on rock fracture , 1999 .

[3]  Takashi Yokoyama,et al.  Determination of Dynamic Fracture-Initiation Toughness Using a Novel Impact Bend Test Procedure , 1993 .

[4]  V. Prakash,et al.  Dynamic deformation and fracture behavior of novel damage tolerant discontinuously reinforced aluminum composites , 2000 .

[5]  V. Parameswaran,et al.  An experimental investigation of dynamic crack propagation in a brittle material reinforced with a ductile layer , 2003 .

[6]  V. Dayal,et al.  Interlaminar shear strength measurement of ceramic composites by asymmetric four point bend shear test , 2003 .

[7]  Daniel Casem,et al.  A Four-Point Bend Technique to Determine Dynamic Fracture Toughness of Ceramics , 2006 .

[8]  Min Zhou,et al.  Separation of elastic waves in split Hopkinson bars using one-point strain measurements , 1999 .

[9]  J. Klepaczko Discussion of a New Experimental Method in Measuring Fracture Toughness Initiation at High Loading Rates by Stress Waves , 1982 .

[10]  J. Molinari,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical simulations of dynamic fracture in silicon carbide reinforced aluminum , 2004 .

[11]  C. Sun,et al.  A method for testing interlaminar dynamic fracture toughness of polymeric composites , 2004 .

[12]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Mode II fracture toughness evaluation using four point bend, end notched flexure test , 1999 .

[13]  Y. Dzenis,et al.  Determination of dynamic delamination toughness of a graphite‐fiber/epoxy composite using Hopkinson pressure bar , 2005 .

[14]  Sia Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  Aashish Rohatgi,et al.  Analysis of modified split Hopkinson pressure bar dynamic fracture test using an inertia model , 2004 .

[16]  B. Crossland,et al.  Mechanical Properties at High Rates of Strain , 1976 .

[17]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Initiation and arrest of an interfacial crack in a four-point bend test , 2005 .

[18]  F. Benitez,et al.  Towards the Development of a Dynamic Fracture Initiation Test , 1984 .

[19]  J. Färm,et al.  Dynamic fracture toughness determined from load-point displacement , 1994 .

[20]  H. Lee,et al.  Effect of microstructure on the cleavage fracture strength of low carbon Mn–Ni–Mo bainitic steels , 2004 .

[21]  Ares J. Rosakis,et al.  Experimental Determination of Dynamic Crack Initiation and Propagation Fracture Toughness in Thin Aluminum Sheets , 1998 .

[22]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone , 2003, Nature materials.

[23]  T. Kurokawa,et al.  Evaluation of Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Composite Laminates under Impact Loading , 1997 .

[24]  Jia-Lin Tsai,et al.  Use of split Hopkinson pressure bar for testing off-axis composites , 2001 .

[25]  Bayoumi,et al.  Investigation of Dynamic JId for Alloy Steel Weldments Using the Split Hopkinson Bar , 1986 .

[26]  U. S. Lindholm Book reviewMechanical properties at high rates of strain 1979: Institute of Physics Conference Series 47; published by the Institute of Physics, London, 1979; 412 pp.; price, £36.00 , 1981 .

[27]  Noel P. O’Dowd,et al.  Mixed-mode fracture toughness of ceramic materials , 1990 .

[28]  R. Clos,et al.  Determination of the dynamic fracture toughness using a new stress pulse loading method , 1992 .

[29]  Daniel Rittel,et al.  A method for dynamic fracture toughness determination using short beams , 2000 .

[30]  Waleed Mekky,et al.  The fracture toughness of Ni/Al2O3 laminates by digital image correlation I: Experimental crack opening displacement and R-curves , 2006 .

[31]  V. Srivastava,et al.  Measurement of critical stress intensity factor in C/C–SiC composites under dynamic and static loading conditions , 2004 .

[32]  S. Rizal,et al.  Dimple fracture under short pulse loading , 2000 .

[33]  Kichinosuke Tanaka,et al.  Impact Bending Test on Steel at Low Temperatures Using a Split Hopkinson Bar , 1980 .

[34]  J. Fernández-Sáez,et al.  Determination of dynamic fracture-initiation toughness using three-point bending tests in a modified Hopkinson pressure bar , 2003 .

[35]  John J. Lewandowski,et al.  Delamination study using four-point bending of bilayers , 1997 .

[36]  Per-Arne Lindqvist,et al.  Effects of high temperatures on dynamic rock fracture , 2001 .

[37]  D. Rittel,et al.  Dynamic fracture detection using the force-displacement reciprocity: application to the compact compression specimen , 1995 .