Validating Precision Estimates in Horizontal Wind Measurements from a Doppler Lidar

Abstract. Results from a recent field campaign are used to assess the accuracy of wind speed and direction precision estimates produced by a Doppler lidar wind retrieval algorithm. The algorithm, which is based on the traditional velocity-azimuth-display (VAD) technique, estimates the wind speed and direction measurement precision using standard error propagation techniques, assuming the input data (i.e., radial velocities) to be contaminated by random, zero-mean, errors. For this study, the lidar was configured to execute an 8-beam plan-position-indicator (PPI) scan once every 12 min during the 6-week deployment period. Several wind retrieval trials were conducted using different schemes for estimating the precision in the radial velocity measurements. The resulting wind speed and direction precision estimates were compared to differences in wind speed and direction between the VAD algorithm and sonic anemometer measurements taken on a nearby 300 m tower. All trials produced qualitatively similar wind fields with negligible bias but substantially different wind speed and direction precision fields. The most accurate wind speed and direction precisions were obtained when the radial velocity precision was determined by direct calculation of radial velocity standard deviation along each pointing direction and range gate of the PPI scan. By contrast, when the instrumental measurement precision is assumed to be the only contribution to the radial velocity precision, the retrievals resulted in wind speed and direction precisions that were biased far too low and were poor indicators of data quality.

[1]  Jirong Yu,et al.  Side-scan Doppler lidar for offshore wind energy applications , 2012 .

[2]  Ioannis Antoniou,et al.  Lidar profilers in the context of wind energy–a verification procedure for traceable measurements , 2012 .

[3]  Jimmy W. Voyles,et al.  The Arm Climate Research Facility: A Review of Structure and Capabilities , 2013 .

[4]  Robert M. Banta,et al.  Doppler Lidar–Based Wind-Profile Measurement System for Offshore Wind-Energy and Other Marine Boundary Layer Applications , 2012 .

[5]  R. Barthelmie,et al.  Wind Measurements from Arc Scans with Doppler Wind Lidar , 2015 .

[6]  Ruben Delgado,et al.  Assessing state-of-the-art capabilities for probing the atmospheric boundary layer: The XPIA field campaign , 2016 .

[7]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Impact of airborne Doppler wind lidar profiles on numerical simulations of a tropical cyclone , 2010 .

[8]  Larry K. Berg,et al.  Turbine‐scale wind field measurements using dual‐Doppler lidar , 2015 .

[9]  Viktor A. Banakh,et al.  Turbulent Energy Dissipation Rate Measurement Using Doppler Lidar , 1997 .

[10]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data , 2000 .

[11]  Carla Cardinali,et al.  Impact of airborne Doppler lidar observations on ECMWF forecasts , 2006 .

[12]  Ta-Hui Lin,et al.  Validation and measurements of floating LiDAR for nearshore wind resource assessment application , 2014 .

[13]  Assimilating Coherent Doppler Lidar Measurements into a Model of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part II: Sensitivity Analyses , 2004 .

[14]  Janet F. Barlow,et al.  An assessment of a three-beam Doppler lidar wind profiling method for use in urban areas , 2013 .

[15]  Viktor A. Banakh,et al.  Estimation of turbulent energy dissipation rate from Doppler lidar data , 1995 .

[16]  J. Kaimal,et al.  The Boulder Atmospheric Observatory , 1983 .

[17]  Marko Princevac,et al.  Retrieval of Microscale Wind and Temperature Fields from Single- and Dual-Doppler Lidar Data , 2005 .

[18]  S. Schwartz,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: Programmatic Background and Design of the Cloud and Radiation Test Bed , 1994 .

[19]  Ronald Calhoun,et al.  A new formulation for rotor equivalent wind speed for wind resource assessment and wind power forecasting , 2016 .

[20]  Watts,et al.  Impact of airborne Doppler lidar observations on ECMWF forecasts , .

[21]  Julie K. Lundquist,et al.  Quantifying error of lidar and sodar Doppler beam swinging measurements of wind turbine wakes using computational fluid dynamics , 2015 .

[22]  Rod Frehlich,et al.  Estimating Spatial Velocity Statistics with Coherent Doppler Lidar , 2002 .

[23]  Petra M. Klein,et al.  Testing and validation of multi‐lidar scanning strategies for wind energy applications , 2016 .

[24]  R. Newsom,et al.  Assimilating Coherent Doppler Lidar Measurements into a Model of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part I: Algorithm Development and Sensitivity to Measurement Error , 2004 .

[25]  Tianfeng Chai,et al.  Retrieval of Microscale Flow Structures from High-Resolution Doppler Lidar Data Using an Adjoint Model , 2004 .

[26]  F. Davies,et al.  On the accuracy of retrieved wind information from Doppler lidar observations , 2003 .

[27]  Steven Lang,et al.  LIDAR and SODAR Measurements of Wind Speed and Direction in Upland Terrain for Wind Energy Purposes , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[28]  Rod Frehlich,et al.  Velocity Error for Coherent Doppler Lidar with Pulse Accumulation , 2004 .

[29]  Guy N. Pearson,et al.  An Analysis of the Performance of the UFAM Pulsed Doppler Lidar for Observing the Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[30]  Viktor A. Banakh,et al.  Accuracy of estimation of the turbulent energy dissipation rate from wind measurements with a conically scanning pulsed coherent Doppler lidar. Part I. Algorithm of data processing , 2013 .

[31]  J. Wilczak,et al.  Sonic Anemometer Tilt Correction Algorithms , 2001 .

[32]  K. A. Browning,et al.  The Determination of Kinematic Properties of a Wind Field Using Doppler Radar , 1968 .

[33]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Identification of Tower-Wake Distortions Using Sonic Anemometer and Lidar Measurements , 2016 .

[34]  R. Atlas,et al.  Impact of Doppler lidar wind observations on a single-level meteorological analysis , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[35]  S. Gryning,et al.  Offshore wind profiling using light detection and ranging measurements , 2009 .