The engineering options for mitigating the climate impacts of aviation

Aviation is a growing contributor to climate change, with unique impacts due to the altitude of emissions. If existing traffic growth rates continue, radical engineering solutions will be required to prevent aviation becoming one of the dominant contributors to climate change. This paper reviews the engineering options for mitigating the climate impacts of aviation using aircraft and airspace technologies. These options include not only improvements in fuel efficiency, which would reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, but also measures to reduce non-CO2 impacts including the formation of persistent contrails. Integrated solutions to optimize environmental performance will require changes to airframes, engines, avionics, air traffic control systems and airspace design. While market-based measures, such as offset schemes and emissions trading, receive growing attention, this paper sets out the crucial role of engineering in the challenge to develop a ‘green air traffic system’.

[1]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  It is premature to include non-CO2 effects of aviation in emission trading schemes , 2006 .

[2]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Variability of Contrail Formation Conditions and the Implications for Policies to Reduce the Climate Impacts of Aviation , 2005 .

[3]  Klaus Gierens,et al.  A note on how to avoid contrail cirrus , 2005 .

[4]  J. Middel,et al.  Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft An overview of historical and future trends , 2005 .

[5]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Atmospheric CO 2 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network , 1994 .

[6]  J. E. Green,et al.  Civil aviation and the environment – the next frontier for the aerodynamicist , 2006, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[7]  Alice Bows,et al.  Policy Clash: Can Projected Aviation Growth be Reconciled with the UK Government's 60% Carbon-Reduction Target? , 2007 .

[8]  Klaus Gierens,et al.  Ice supersaturation in the tropopause region over Lindenberg, Germany , 2003 .

[9]  Sally Cairns,et al.  Predict and decide - aviation, climate change and UK policy , 2006 .

[10]  Volker Grewe,et al.  Impact of Aircraft NOx Emissions. Part 2: Effects of Lowering the Flight Altitude , 2002 .

[11]  Peter Brooker,et al.  Civil aircraft design priorities: air quality? climate change? noise? , 2006, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[12]  Urmila M Diwekar Greener by design. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  J Lee The potential offered ny aircraft and engine technologies , 2003 .

[14]  Fredrik Svensson,et al.  Reduced environmental impact by lowered cruise altitude for liquid hydrogen-fuelled aircraft , 2004 .

[15]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  Potential of reducing the environmental impact of aviation by using hydrogen Part I: Background, prospects and challenges , 2006, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[16]  J. Penner,et al.  Aviation and the Global Atmosphere , 1999 .

[17]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Potential of the cryoplane technology to reduce aircraft climate impact: A state-of-the-art assessment , 2006 .

[18]  Woodrow Whitlow,et al.  Propulsion and power for 21st century aviation , 2004 .

[19]  Riti Singh,et al.  Effects of Using Hydrogen on Aero Gas Turbine Pollutant Emissions: Performance and Design , 2004 .

[20]  Ulrich Schumann,et al.  Influence of propulsion efficiency on contrail formation , 2000 .

[21]  Tom Hynes,et al.  Towards a silent aircraft , 2006 .

[22]  Klaus Gierens Are fuel additives a viable contrail mitigation option , 2007 .

[23]  R. Sepanski,et al.  TRENDS '90: A compendium of data on global change , 1991 .

[24]  R. K. Nangia Efficiency parameters for modern commercial aircraft , 2006 .

[25]  David S. Lee,et al.  Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: an update on IPCC (1999) , 2005 .