High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging.

Genome-wide mapping of nucleosomes has revealed a great deal about the relationships between chromatin structure and control of gene expression, and has led to mechanistic hypotheses regarding the rules by which chromatin structure is established. High-throughput sequencing has recently become the technology of choice for chromatin mapping studies, yet analysis of these experiments is still in its infancy. Here, we introduce a pipeline for analyzing deep sequencing maps of chromatin structure and apply it to data from S. cerevisiae. We analyze a digestion series where nucleosomes are isolated from under- and overdigested chromatin. We find that certain classes of nucleosomes are unusually susceptible or resistant to overdigestion, with promoter nucleosomes easily digested and mid-coding region nucleosomes being quite stable. We find evidence for highly sensitive nucleosomes located within "nucleosome-free regions," suggesting that these regions are not always completely naked but instead are likely associated with easily digested nucleosomes. Finally, since RNA polymerase is the dominant energy-consuming machine that operates on the chromatin template, we analyze changes in chromatin structure when RNA polymerase is inactivated via a temperature-sensitive mutation. We find evidence that RNA polymerase plays a role in nucleosome eviction at promoters and is also responsible for retrograde shifts in nucleosomes during transcription. Loss of RNA polymerase results in a relaxation of chromatin structure to more closely match in vitro nucleosome positioning preferences. Together, these results provide analytical tools and experimental guidance for nucleosome mapping experiments, and help disentangle the interlinked processes of transcription and chromatin packaging.

[1]  R A Laskey,et al.  High sequence specificity of micrococcal nuclease. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[3]  Sven Bergmann,et al.  Rewiring of the Yeast Transcriptional Network Through the Evolution of Motif Usage , 2005, Science.

[4]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[5]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.

[7]  W Hörz,et al.  Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[9]  K. Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  V. Iyer,et al.  Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[11]  E. Segal,et al.  Poly(da:dt) Tracts: Major Determinants of Nucleosome Organization This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Protein-nucleic Acid Interactions Edited , 2022 .

[12]  Oliver J. Rando,et al.  Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription , 2007, Nature.

[13]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.

[14]  X. Wang,et al.  Activator Control of Nucleosome Occupancy in Activation and Repression of Transcription , 2008, PLoS biology.

[15]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[16]  K. Seifart,et al.  A nucleosome positioned in the distal promoter region activates transcription of the human U6 gene , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[17]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Evidence for Eviction and Rapid Deposition of Histones upon Transcriptional Elongation by RNA Polymerase II , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[18]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range , 2008, Nature.

[19]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  genome Saccharomyces and its regulators in the A canonical promoter organization of the transcription machinery Material Supplemental , 2009 .

[20]  Steven M. Johnson,et al.  A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. , 2008, Genome research.

[21]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Dynamics of Replication-Independent Histone Turnover in Budding Yeast , 2007, Science.

[22]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. , 2007, Genome research.

[23]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[24]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[25]  Daria A. Gaykalova,et al.  Nucleosomes can form a polar barrier to transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[26]  S. Lomvardas,et al.  Modifying Gene Expression Programs by Altering Core Promoter Chromatin Architecture , 2002, Cell.

[27]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Genome-wide profiling of salt fractions maps physical properties of chromatin. , 2009, Genome research.

[28]  N. Friedman,et al.  Single-Nucleosome Mapping of Histone Modifications in S. cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS biology.

[29]  P. Chambon,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of transcription of nucleosomal complexes. , 1980, European journal of biochemistry.

[30]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[31]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome , 2008, Cell.

[32]  V. Iyer,et al.  Absolute mRNA levels and transcriptional initiation rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast , 1999, Nature.

[34]  Noam Kaplan,et al.  Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[35]  G. Turin,et al.  An introduction to matched filters , 1960, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[36]  Young-Joon Kim,et al.  Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[37]  I. Albert,et al.  Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2007, Nature.

[38]  Hunter B. Fraser,et al.  Ab initio construction of a eukaryotic transcriptome by massively parallel mRNA sequencing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Guo-Cheng Yuan,et al.  Genomic Sequence Is Highly Predictive of Local Nucleosome Depletion , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  L. Stryer,et al.  Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  R. Young,et al.  Eucaryotic RNA polymerase conditional mutant that rapidly ceases mRNA synthesis , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[42]  B. Cairns,et al.  The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. , 2009, Annual review of biochemistry.

[43]  Stephan C. Schuster,et al.  Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome , 2008, Nature.

[44]  Jung Kyoon Choi,et al.  Epigenetic regulation and the variability of gene expression , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[45]  Adil Jamai,et al.  Continuous histone H2B and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast cells outside of replication. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[46]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[47]  E. Geiduschek,et al.  Mechanism of transcription through the nucleosome by eukaryotic RNA polymerase. , 1997, Science.

[48]  Sumio Sugano,et al.  Chromatin-Associated Periodicity in Genetic Variation Downstream of Transcriptional Start Sites , 2009, Science.

[49]  Toshio Tsukiyama,et al.  Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[50]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Dynamic Remodeling of Individual Nucleosomes Across a Eukaryotic Genome in Response to Transcriptional Perturbation , 2007, PLoS biology.

[51]  N. Friedman,et al.  Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi , 2007, Nature.

[52]  Carlos Bustamante,et al.  Nucleosomal Fluctuations Govern the Transcription Dynamics of RNA Polymerase II , 2009, Science.

[53]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[54]  J. Workman,et al.  Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[55]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  Genome-wide distribution of yeast RNA polymerase II and its control by Sen1 helicase. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[56]  J. Lieb,et al.  Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[57]  F. Robert,et al.  Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[58]  H. Martinson,et al.  Nucleosomes will not form on double-stranded RNa or over poly(dA).poly(dT) tracts in recombinant DNA. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[59]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Distinct Modes of Regulation by Chromatin Encoded through Nucleosome Positioning Signals , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[60]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[61]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  A histone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template , 1994, Cell.

[62]  John D. Storey,et al.  Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  H R Drew,et al.  DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[64]  Kairong Cui,et al.  H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark ‘nucleosome-free regions’ of active promoters and other regulatory regions in the human genome , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[65]  I. Albert,et al.  Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[66]  O. Rando,et al.  Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter? , 2010, Developmental biology.