Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty.

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced as a tool to increase the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with conventional instrumentation (CLI). However, previous studies have shown inconsistent results. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the performance of PSI to CLI in TKA. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible trials published between 2000 and March 2014. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality according to the Cochrane Handbook. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the different study designs (randomized, controlled trial [RCT] vs non-randomized, controlled trial [non-RCT]), preoperative magnetic resonance imaging vs computed tomography, and systems of PSI to explore the source of heterogeneity. Fourteen studies (7 RCTs and 7 non-RCTs) involving 1906 patients were included. There were no statistical differences with respect to the outliers of mechanical axis, coronal femoral component, sagittal femoral component, femoral component rotation, operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay between PSI and CLI groups. The number of outliers in coronal tibial components (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 4.35; P=.01) and sagittal tibial components (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 2.42; P<.01) was significantly lower in the CLI group than in the PSI group. Based on the numbers available, the use of PSI compared with CLI was not likely to improve the accuracy of component alignment and treatment effects of TKA. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm the authors' results.

[1]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[2]  R. Barrack,et al.  Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  H. Chong,et al.  Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[4]  P. Massin,et al.  Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Carsten O Tibesku,et al.  Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. , 2014, The Knee.

[6]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  K. Takaoka,et al.  TKA Sagittal Alignment with Navigation Systems and Conventional Techniques Vary Only a Few Degrees , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  J. Mason,et al.  In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Patient-specific Guides Do Not Improve Accuracy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  E. Thienpont,et al.  The difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing alignment in patient-specific instrumentation planning , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[11]  P. Meere,et al.  Computer-Assisted Surgery Patterns of Ligamentous Deformity of the Knee: A Clinical and Cadaveric Study , 2013, The journal of knee surgery.

[12]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  I. Harris,et al.  A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  Tao Cheng,et al.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  P. Fennema,et al.  Can technology improve alignment during knee arthroplasty. , 2013, The Knee.

[16]  Henry T. Stelfox,et al.  Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Markus Tingart,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a review of literature , 2012, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[18]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  B. Seedhom,et al.  Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[20]  C. Pornrattanamaneewong,et al.  A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[21]  S. Haas,et al.  Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a review. , 2012, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[22]  P. Nicolai,et al.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  M. Ritter,et al.  Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[25]  K. Daniilidis,et al.  A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[26]  T. Chotanaphuti,et al.  The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial. , 2014, The Knee.

[27]  Andy Khye Soon Yew,et al.  The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[28]  P. Boisrenoult,et al.  Pin track induced fractures around computer-assisted TKA. , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[29]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  S. Lee,et al.  Is TKA Using Patient-specific Instruments Comparable to Conventional TKA? A Randomized Controlled Study of One System , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  M. Ritter,et al.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  P. Lotke,et al.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  M A Freeman,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  J. Argenson,et al.  Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[37]  W. Jeong,et al.  Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[38]  R. Hsu,et al.  Effect of preoperative deformity on postoperative leg axis in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[39]  Emmanuel Thienpont,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments improves function and restores limb alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity. , 2013, The Knee.

[40]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[41]  B. Boonen,et al.  Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[42]  T. Fehring.  Rotational Malalignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[43]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Alignment With Patient-specific Positioning Guides Compared With Manual Instrumentation in TKA , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[44]  C. Engh,et al.  Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[45]  Peter F. M. Choong,et al.  Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[46]  Karen Sloan,et al.  Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.