Gender differences in land-use decisions: shaping multifunctional landscapes?

While decision-making processes of land managers drive land-use change and affect the provision of ecosystems services, there is no concrete understanding of whether gender specificity in decision-making influences the multifunctionality of landscapes. We distinguish eleven elements in a typical management cycle. In reviewing the literature, we found apparent gaps on gendered knowledge, preferences, risk taking and access to innovation in land-use decision making. Male and female responses in the adoption of agroforestry practices and other investment opportunities reflect differing exposure to and perceptions of risk. Innovative approaches such as agent-based models and role-playing games are currently applied to study gendered behavior in land-use decisions. These approaches can assist researchers to explicitly and empirically compare potentially self-reinforcing behaviors or feedback loops with local impacts on ecosystem services.

[1]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[2]  J. Pretty,et al.  Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups , 2005 .

[3]  John Coates,et al.  The Hour Between Dog and Wolf: Risk Taking, Gut Feelings and the Biology of Boom and Bust , 2012 .

[4]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Gender and Sustainable Forest Management in East Africa and Latin America , 2011 .

[5]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and LandCover Change : A Review , 2002 .

[6]  William G. Kennedy,et al.  Modelling Human Behaviour in Agent-Based Models , 2012 .

[7]  Li An,et al.  Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models , 2012 .

[8]  M. Qaim,et al.  Gender, agricultural commercialization, and collective action in Kenya , 2012, Food Security.

[9]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the Investment Game , 2008 .

[10]  J. Lassoie,et al.  Household decision-making in agroforestry parklands of Sudano-Sahelian Mali , 2011, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Information seeking in social context: structural influences and receipt of information benefits , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[12]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Landscape Scenarios and Multifunctionality - Making Land Use Assessment Operational Landscape Scenarios and Multifunctionality: Making Land Use Impact Assessment Operational , 2011 .

[13]  S. Franzel,et al.  Gender and Agroforestry in Africa: Who Benefits? The African Perspective , 2012 .

[14]  Fatma Osman Ibnouf.  The Value of Women's Indigenous Knowledge in Food Processing and Preservation for Achieving Household Food Security in Rural Sudan , 2012 .

[15]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[16]  A. Quisumbing,et al.  A review of empirical evidence on gender differences in nonland agricultural inputs, technology, and services in developing countries , 2014 .

[17]  Catherine Ragasa,et al.  Gender and Institutional Dimensions of Agricultural Technology Adoption: A Review of Literature and Synthesis of 35 Case Studies , 2012 .

[18]  G. Mohren,et al.  Fuelwood demand and supply in Rwanda and the role of agroforestry , 2011, Agroforestry Systems.

[19]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  T. Schelling.  Models of Segregation , 1969 .

[21]  G. Villamor,et al.  Payments for Environmental Services: Evolution Toward Efficient and Fair Incentives for Multifunctional Landscapes , 2012 .

[22]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials , 2006 .

[23]  P. Hedstrom.  Quantitative research, agent-based modelling and theories of the social (with Yvonne Åberg) , 2005 .

[24]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: Are we asking the right questions? , 2004 .

[25]  P. Wilson,et al.  Explaining variation in farm and farm business performance in respect to farmer behavioural segmentation analysis: Implications for land use policies , 2013 .

[26]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Gender: A Key dimension LinKinG AGricuLturAL ProGrAms to imProved nutrition And HeALtH , 2011 .

[27]  Grace B. Villamor,et al.  Human decision making for empirical agent-based models: construction and validation , 2012 .

[28]  H. Haberl,et al.  Challenges for land system science , 2012 .

[29]  Countertopographies of Agriculture Gender, Food Production, and Development in a Globalizing World , 2012 .

[30]  Fatma Osman Ibnouf.  Challenges and possibilities for achieving household food security in the Western Sudan region: the role of female farmers , 2011, Food Security.

[31]  Grace B. Villamor,et al.  Diversity deficits in modelled landscape mosaics , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[32]  S. Kaaria,et al.  Linking Smallholder Farmers to Markets, Gender and Intra-Household Dynamics: Does the Choice of Commodity Matter? , 2011 .

[33]  Nikolaos Georgantzís,et al.  Gender differences in ultimatum games: Despite rather than due to risk attitudes , 2012 .

[34]  C. Colfer,et al.  Women, men and forest research: A review of approaches, resources and methods for addressing gender , 2012 .

[35]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[36]  Gloria J. Leckie.  'They Never Trusted Me to Drive': Farm girls and the gender relations of agricultural information transfer , 1996 .

[37]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Gender and Negotiation in the Small: Are Women (Perceived to Be) More Cooperative than Men? , 2008 .

[38]  A. Booth,et al.  Salience, Risky Choices and Gender , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[39]  Grace B. Villamor,et al.  Human Decision Making In Empirical Agent-Based Models: Pitfalls And Caveats For Land-Use Change Policies , 2012, ECMS.

[40]  G. Villamor,et al.  Gender influences decisions to change land use practices in the tropical forest margins of Jambi, Indonesia , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[41]  B. Koppen,et al.  Gender in Irrigated Farming , 2011 .

[42]  P. Meyfroidt.  Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview , 2013 .

[43]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  The gender implications of large-scale land deals , 2012 .

[44]  A. Booth,et al.  Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour: Does Nurture Matter? , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[45]  Jon Atwell,et al.  Agent-Based Models in Empirical Social Research , 2015, Sociological methods & research.

[46]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[47]  Lukas Menkhoff,et al.  Risk attitude and risk behavior: Comparing Thailand and Vietnam , 2011 .

[48]  Meine van Noordwijk,et al.  Negotiation Support Models for Integrated Natural Resource Management in Tropical Forest Margins , 2002 .