Passive tools for enhancing muscle-driven motion and locomotion

SUMMARY Musculo–skeletal systems and body design in general have evolved to move effectively and travel in specific environments. Humans have always aspired to reach higher power movement and to locomote safely and fast, even through unfamiliar media (air, water, snow, ice). For the last few millennia, human ingenuity has led to the invention of a variety of passive tools that help to compensate for the limitations in their body design. This Commentary discusses many of those tools, ranging from halteres used by athletes in ancient Greece, to bows, skis, fins, skates and bicycles, which are characterised by not supplying any additional mechanical energy, thus retaining the use of muscular force alone. The energy cascade from metabolic fuel to final movement is described, with particular emphasis on the steps where some energy saving and/or power enhancement is viable. Swimming is used to illustrate the efficiency breakdown in complex locomotion, and the advantage of using fins. A novel graphical representation of world records in different types of terrestrial and aquatic locomotion is presented, which together with a suggested method for estimating their metabolic cost (energy per unit distance), will illustrate the success of the tools used.

[1]  P Zamparo,et al.  From bipedalism to bicyclism: evolution in energetics and biomechanics of historic bicycles , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  G J Van Ingen Schenau,et al.  A new skate allowing powerful plantar flexions improves performance. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  N. Curtin,et al.  Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. , 1985, Monographs of the Physiological Society.

[4]  P. E. D. Prampero,et al.  Cycling on Earth, in space, on the Moon , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[5]  B. C. Abbott,et al.  The physiological cost of negative work , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  P Zamparo,et al.  How fins affect the economy and efficiency of human swimming. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  A. Hill The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 1938 .

[8]  W. O. Fenn FRICTIONAL AND KINETIC FACTORS IN THE WORK OF SPRINT RUNNING , 1930 .

[9]  P. D. di Prampero,et al.  The Energy Cost of Human Locomotion on Land and in Water* , 1986, International journal of sports medicine.

[10]  F. Saibene,et al.  The optimal locomotion on gradients: walking, running or cycling? , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[11]  T J Roberts,et al.  Muscular Force in Running Turkeys: The Economy of Minimizing Work , 1997, Science.

[12]  T. McMahon,et al.  Fast running tracks. , 1978, Scientific American.

[13]  A. Biewener,et al.  In vivo muscle force-length behavior during steady-speed hopping in tammar wallabies. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Alberto E. Minetti,et al.  Biomechanics: Halteres used in ancient Olympic long jump , 2002, Nature.